Department of Allergology and Immunology, Clinical Research Unit, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre-Bénite, France.
Department of Dermatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris VII Denis Diderot University, Paris, France.
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Mar-Apr;6(2):562-569.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.07.007. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
Methotrexate is currently used to treat atopic dermatitis but has never been assessed versus cyclosporine in adults.
This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of methotrexate versus cyclosporine in patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis.
Patients were randomized to receive either oral methotrexate (15 mg/wk) or cyclosporine (2.5 mg/kg/d) for 8 weeks. The primary end point was a patient achieving 50% improvement in the SCORing Atopic Dermatitis index (SCORAD 50) at week 8. When the primary end point was not achieved, methotrexate was increased to 25 mg and cyclosporine to 5 mg during the next 16 weeks. The secondary end points were a patient achieving a 50% reduction in the Eczema Area Severity Intensity index (EASI 50) and SCORAD 50 at each visit (ClinicalTrials.gov no. NCT00809172).
A total of 97 patients received methotrexate 15 mg (n = 50) or cyclosporine 2.5 mg (n = 47). Regarding the primary end point at week 8, methotrexate was inferior to cyclosporine because the proportion of patients with SCORAD 50 was 8% (4 of 50) in the methotrexate arm versus 42% (18 of 43) in the cyclosporine arm. The difference in percentages for the 2 treatment groups (2-sided 90% CI) was -34% (-48% to -20%). At week 8, methotrexate and cyclosporine dosages were increased in 56% and 49% of the patients, respectively. Regarding EASI 50, the noninferiority end point was reached at week 20 in 92% (22 of 24) of patients in the methotrexate arm and 87% (26 of 30) of patients in the cyclosporine arm. The treatment-related adverse events were more frequent with cyclosporine (P < .0001).
Methotrexate 15 mg/wk was inferior to cyclosporine 2.5 mg/kg/d at week 8. Increasing the doses of methotrexate to 25 mg/wk induced a significant improvement versus cyclosporine at week 20.
甲氨蝶呤目前被用于治疗特应性皮炎,但从未在成人中与环孢素进行过比较。
本研究评估了甲氨蝶呤与环孢素在中重度特应性皮炎患者中的疗效和安全性。
患者被随机分配接受每周 15 毫克甲氨蝶呤或 2.5 毫克/公斤/天的环孢素治疗 8 周。主要终点是在第 8 周时 SCORing 特应性皮炎指数(SCORAD 50)达到 50%改善的患者。当主要终点未达到时,在接下来的 16 周内,甲氨蝶呤增加至 25 毫克,环孢素增加至 5 毫克。次要终点是在每次就诊时达到湿疹面积严重程度指数(EASI 50)和 SCORAD 50 降低 50%的患者。(ClinicalTrials.gov 编号:NCT00809172)。
共有 97 名患者接受了甲氨蝶呤 15 毫克(n=50)或环孢素 2.5 毫克(n=47)。关于第 8 周的主要终点,甲氨蝶呤不如环孢素,因为在甲氨蝶呤组中 SCORAD 50 的患者比例为 8%(50 例中的 4 例),而在环孢素组中为 42%(43 例中的 18 例)。两组治疗的百分比差异(双侧 90%CI)为-34%(-48%至-20%)。在第 8 周时,56%的患者增加了甲氨蝶呤的剂量,49%的患者增加了环孢素的剂量。关于 EASI 50,在第 20 周时,甲氨蝶呤组中有 92%(24 例中的 22 例)的患者达到非劣效终点,环孢素组中有 87%(30 例中的 26 例)的患者达到非劣效终点。环孢素的治疗相关不良事件更为频繁(P<.0001)。
在第 8 周时,每周 15 毫克的甲氨蝶呤不如每天 2.5 毫克/公斤的环孢素。将甲氨蝶呤的剂量增加到每周 25 毫克,在第 20 周时与环孢素相比显著改善。