Palaeoscience Research Centre, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2018 May;93(2):754-784. doi: 10.1111/brv.12365. Epub 2017 Oct 2.
The Cambrian Explosion is arguably the most extreme example of a biological radiation preserved in the fossil record, and studies of Cambrian Lagerstätten have facilitated the exploration of many facets of this key evolutionary event. As predation was a major ecological driver behind the Explosion - particularly the radiation of biomineralising metazoans - the evidence for shell crushing (durophagy), drilling and puncturing predation in the Cambrian (and possibly the Ediacaran) is considered. Examples of durophagous predation on biomineralised taxa other than trilobites are apparently rare, reflecting predator preference, taphonomic and sampling biases, or simply lack of documentation. The oldest known example of durophagy is shell damage on the problematic taxon Mobergella holsti from the early Cambrian (possibly Terreneuvian) of Sweden. Using functional morphology to identify (or perhaps misidentify) durophagous predators is discussed, with emphasis on the toolkit used by Cambrian arthropods, specifically the radiodontan oral cone and the frontal and gnathobasic appendages of various taxa. Records of drill holes and possible puncture holes in Cambrian shells are mostly on brachiopods, but the lack of prey diversity may represent either a true biological signal or a result of various biases. The oldest drilled Cambrian shells occur in a variety of Terreneuvian-aged taxa, but specimens of the ubiquitous Ediacaran shelly fossil Cloudina also show putative drilling traces. Knowledge on Cambrian shell drillers is sorely lacking and there is little evidence or consensus concerning the taxonomic groups that made the holes, which often leads to the suggestion of an unknown 'soft bodied driller'. Useful methodologies for deciphering the identities and capabilities of shell drillers are outlined. Evidence for puncture holes in Cambrian shelly taxa is rare. Such holes are more jagged than drill holes and possibly made by a Cambrian 'puncher'. The Cambrian arthropod Yohoia may have used its frontal appendages in a jack-knifing manner, similar to Recent stomatopod crustaceans, to strike and puncture shells rapidly. Finally, Cambrian durophagous and shell-drilling predation is considered in the context of escalation - an evolutionary process that, amongst other scenarios, involves predators (and other 'enemies') as the predominant agents of natural selection. The rapid increase in diversity and abundance of biomineralised shells during the early Cambrian is often attributed to escalation: enemies placed selective pressure on prey, forcing phenotypic responses in prey and, by extension, in predator groups over time. Unfortunately, few case studies illustrate long-term patterns in shelly fossil morphologies that may reflect the influence of predation throughout the Cambrian. More studies on phenotypic change in hard-shelled lineages are needed to convincingly illustrate escalation and the responses of prey during the Cambrian.
寒武纪大爆发可以说是化石记录中生物辐射最为极端的例子,对寒武纪生物特异埋藏化石的研究促进了对这一关键进化事件的多方面探索。由于捕食是大爆发的主要生态驱动因素,特别是生物矿化后生动物的辐射,因此研究了寒武纪(可能还有埃迪卡拉纪)的壳破碎(硬壳捕食)、钻孔和刺穿捕食的证据。除三叶虫外,对生物矿化分类群进行硬壳捕食的例子显然很少,这反映了捕食者的偏好、化石化和采样偏差,或者只是缺乏记录。已知最早的硬壳捕食者的例子是来自瑞典早寒武纪(可能是特伦嫩阶)的有问题的分类群 Mobergella holsti 的壳损伤。本文讨论了使用功能形态学来识别(或可能错误识别)硬壳捕食者的问题,重点是寒武纪节肢动物使用的工具包,特别是放射虫类的口腔圆锥体以及各种分类群的额和颌基附肢。寒武纪壳钻孔和可能的穿孔记录主要在腕足动物上,但猎物多样性的缺乏可能代表真正的生物学信号,也可能是各种偏差的结果。最古老的有钻孔的寒武纪壳出现在各种特伦嫩阶年龄的分类群中,但无处不在的埃迪卡拉纪有壳化石 Cloudina 的标本也显示出有钻孔痕迹。关于寒武纪壳钻孔器的知识非常匮乏,关于制造这些孔的分类群几乎没有证据或共识,这往往导致人们猜测有一种未知的“软躯体钻孔器”。概述了用于破译壳钻孔器身份和能力的有用方法。寒武纪有壳生物中很少有穿刺孔的证据。这些孔比钻孔更锯齿状,可能是由寒武纪“穿孔器”造成的。寒武纪节肢动物 Yohoia 可能以前额附肢呈“折刀式”方式使用,类似于现代虾蛄甲壳类动物,以快速撞击和刺穿贝壳。最后,在进化的背景下考虑了寒武纪的硬壳捕食和壳钻孔捕食,这是一个进化过程,在其他情况下,捕食者(和其他“敌人”)是自然选择的主要因素。早寒武纪生物矿化壳多样性和丰度的快速增加通常归因于进化:敌人对猎物施加了选择性压力,迫使猎物产生表型反应,并且随着时间的推移,也迫使捕食者群体产生表型反应。不幸的是,很少有案例研究说明了有壳化石形态在整个寒武纪可能反映捕食影响的长期模式。需要更多关于硬壳谱系表型变化的研究来令人信服地说明在寒武纪期间的进化和猎物的反应。