Xiao Hai-Fan, Zhang Bai-Hua, Liao Xian-Zhen, Yan Shi-Peng, Zhu Song-Lin, Zhou Feng, Zhou Yi-Kai
State Key Laboratory of Environment Health (Incubation), Key Laboratory of Environment and Health, Ministry of Education, Key Laboratory of Environment and Health (Wuhan), Ministry of Environmental Protection, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430030, China.
The Department of Cancer Prevention, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Changsha 410006, China.
Oncotarget. 2017 Aug 2;8(38):64303-64316. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19791. eCollection 2017 Sep 8.
This study aimed to construct two prognostic nomograms to predict survival in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) using a novel set of clinical parameters.
Two nomograms were developed, using a retrospective analysis of 5384 NSCLC and 647 SCLC patients seen during a 10-year period at Xiang Ya Affiliated Cancer Hospital (Changsha, China). The patients were randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify the prognostic factors needed to establish nomograms for the training cohort. The model was internally validated via bootstrap resampling and externally certified using the validation cohort. Predictive accuracy and discriminatory capability were estimated using concordance index (C-index), calibration curves, and risk group stratification.
The largest contributor to overall survival (OS) prognosis in the NSCLC nomogram was the therapeutic regimen and diagnostic method parameters, and in the SCLC nomogram was the therapeutic regimen and health insurance plan parameters. Calibration curves for the nomogram prediction and the actual observation were in optimal agreement for the 3-year OS and acceptable agreement for the 5-year OS in both training datasets. The C-index was higher for the NSCLC cohort nomogram than for the TNM staging system (0.67 vs. 0.64, P = 0.01) and higher for the SCLC nomogram than for the clinical staging system (limited vs. extensive) (0.60 vs. 0.53, = 0.12).
Treatment regimen parameter made the largest contribution to OS prognosis in both nomograms, and these nomograms might provide clinicians and patients a simple tool that improves their ability to accurately estimate survival based on individual patient parameters rather than using an averaged predefined treatment regimen.
本研究旨在构建两个预后列线图,使用一组新的临床参数预测非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)和小细胞肺癌(SCLC)患者的生存率。
通过对在10年期间于湘雅附属肿瘤医院(中国长沙)就诊的5384例NSCLC患者和647例SCLC患者进行回顾性分析,开发了两个列线图。患者被随机分为训练队列和验证队列。采用单因素和多因素分析来确定为训练队列建立列线图所需的预后因素。该模型通过自举重采样进行内部验证,并使用验证队列进行外部验证。使用一致性指数(C指数)、校准曲线和风险组分层来估计预测准确性和鉴别能力。
NSCLC列线图中对总生存期(OS)预后贡献最大的是治疗方案和诊断方法参数,而SCLC列线图中是治疗方案和医疗保险计划参数。在两个训练数据集中,列线图预测与实际观察的校准曲线在3年OS时具有最佳一致性,在5年OS时具有可接受的一致性。NSCLC队列列线图的C指数高于TNM分期系统(0.67对0.64,P = 0.01),SCLC列线图的C指数高于临床分期系统(局限期对广泛期)(0.60对0.53,P = 0.12)。
治疗方案参数在两个列线图中对OS预后的贡献最大,这些列线图可能为临床医生和患者提供一个简单的工具,提高他们基于个体患者参数而不是使用平均预定义治疗方案准确估计生存期的能力。