Virginia Institute of Psychiatric and Behavioral Genetics,Virginia Commonwealth University,Richmond,VA,USA.
Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences,UCLA;David Geffen School of Medicine,Center for Neurobehavioral Genetics,UCLA;and Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior at UCLA;Los Angeles,CA,USA.
Psychol Med. 2018 Apr;48(5):777-789. doi: 10.1017/S0033291717002148. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
Previous studies have demonstrated that several major psychiatric disorders are influenced by shared genetic factors. This shared liability may influence clinical features of a given disorder (e.g. severity, age at onset). However, findings have largely been limited to European samples; little is known about the consistency of shared genetic liability across ethnicities.
The relationship between polygenic risk for several major psychiatric diagnoses and major depressive disorder (MDD) was examined in a sample of unrelated Han Chinese women. Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) were generated using European discovery samples and tested in the China, Oxford, and VCU Experimental Research on Genetic Epidemiology [CONVERGE (maximum N = 10 502)], a sample ascertained for recurrent MDD. Genetic correlations between discovery phenotypes and MDD were also assessed. In addition, within-case characteristics were examined.
European-based polygenic risk for several major psychiatric disorder phenotypes was significantly associated with the MDD case status in CONVERGE. Risk for clinically significant indicators (neuroticism and subjective well-being) was also associated with case-control status. The variance accounted for by PRS for both psychopathology and for well-being was similar to estimates reported for within-ethnicity comparisons in European samples. However, European-based PRS were largely unassociated with CONVERGE family history, clinical characteristics, or comorbidity.
The shared genetic liability across severe forms of psychopathology is largely consistent across European and Han Chinese ethnicities, with little attenuation of genetic signal relative to within-ethnicity analyses. The overall absence of associations between PRS for other disorders and within-MDD variation suggests that clinical characteristics of MDD may arise due to contributions from ethnicity-specific factors and/or pathoplasticity.
先前的研究表明,几种主要的精神疾病受到共同遗传因素的影响。这种共同的易感性可能会影响特定疾病的临床特征(例如,严重程度、发病年龄)。然而,这些发现主要局限于欧洲样本;对于不同种族之间共同遗传易感性的一致性知之甚少。
在一组无关的汉族女性中,研究了几种主要精神疾病诊断和重度抑郁症(MDD)的多基因风险之间的关系。使用欧洲发现样本生成多基因风险评分(PRS),并在中国、牛津和弗吉尼亚州立大学遗传流行病学实验研究[CONVERGE(最大 N=10502)]中进行测试,该样本是为复发性 MDD 确定的。还评估了发现表型与 MDD 之间的遗传相关性。此外,还检查了病例内的特征。
基于欧洲的几种主要精神疾病表型的多基因风险与 CONVERGE 中的 MDD 病例状态显著相关。具有临床意义的指标(神经质和主观幸福感)的风险也与病例对照状态相关。PRS 对精神病理学和幸福感的解释方差与欧洲样本中报告的同种族内比较估计值相似。然而,基于欧洲的 PRS 与 CONVERGE 家族史、临床特征或共病性大多没有关联。
严重精神病理形式的共同遗传易感性在欧洲和汉族之间基本一致,与同种族内分析相比,遗传信号的衰减很小。PRS 与其他疾病之间缺乏关联,以及 MDD 内变异之间缺乏关联,这表明 MDD 的临床特征可能是由于特定种族因素和/或易感性的贡献而产生的。