免疫组织化学法在确定乳腺癌内在生物学亚型中粗针活检与手术标本的比较
Comparison of Core Needle Biopsy and Surgical Specimens in Determining Intrinsic Biological Subtypes of Breast Cancer with Immunohistochemistry.
作者信息
You Kiho, Park Sungmin, Ryu Jai Min, Kim Isaac, Lee Se Kyung, Yu Jonghan, Kim Seok Won, Nam Seok Jin, Lee Jeong Eon
机构信息
Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Surgery, Chungbuk National University Hospital, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheongju, Korea.
出版信息
J Breast Cancer. 2017 Sep;20(3):297-303. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2017.20.3.297. Epub 2017 Sep 22.
PURPOSE
We evaluated the concordance between core needle biopsy (CNB) and surgical specimens on examining intrinsic biological subtypes and receptor status, and determined the accuracy of CNB as a basic diagnostic method.
METHODS
We analyzed breast cancer patients with paired CNB and surgical specimen samples during 2014. We used monoclonal antibodies for nuclear staining, and estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status evaluation. A positive test was defined as staining greater than or equal to 1% of tumor cells. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) was graded by immunohistochemistry and scored as 0 to 3+ according to the recommendations of the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists. Ki-67 immunostaining was performed using the monoclonal antibody Ki-67, and the results were divided at 10% intervals. The cutoff value for high Ki-67 was defined as 20%. Concordance analysis of ER, PR, HER2, Ki-67, and five intrinsic biological subtypes was performed on CNB and surgical specimens. Statistical analysis for concordance was calculated using κ-tests.
RESULTS
We found very good agreement for ER and PR with a concordance of 96.7% for ER (κ=0.903), and 94.3% for PR (κ=0.870). HER2 and Ki-67 showed concordance rates of 84.8% (κ=0.684) and 83.5% (κ=0.647), respectively, which were interpreted as good agreement. Five subgroups analysis showed 85.8% agreement and κ-value of 0.786, also indicating good agreement.
CONCLUSION
CNB showed high diagnostic accuracy compared with surgical specimens, and good agreement for ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67. Our findings reaffirmed the recommendation of CNB as an initial procedure for breast cancer diagnosis, and the assessment of receptor status and intrinsic biological subtypes to determine further treatment plans.
目的
我们评估了在检测内在生物学亚型和受体状态方面,粗针活检(CNB)与手术标本之间的一致性,并确定了CNB作为一种基本诊断方法的准确性。
方法
我们分析了2014年期间患有配对CNB和手术标本样本的乳腺癌患者。我们使用单克隆抗体进行核染色以及雌激素受体(ER)和孕激素受体(PR)状态评估。阳性检测定义为肿瘤细胞染色大于或等于1%。人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)通过免疫组织化学分级,并根据美国临床肿瘤学会/美国病理学家学会的建议评分为0至3+。使用单克隆抗体Ki-67进行Ki-67免疫染色,结果按10%的间隔划分。高Ki-67的临界值定义为20%。对CNB和手术标本进行了ER、PR、HER2、Ki-67以及五种内在生物学亚型的一致性分析。使用κ检验计算一致性的统计分析。
结果
我们发现ER和PR的一致性非常好,ER的一致性为96.7%(κ=0.903),PR的一致性为94.3%(κ=0.870)。HER2和Ki-67的一致性率分别为84.8%(κ=0.684)和83.5%(κ=0.647),被解释为一致性良好。五个亚组分析显示一致性为85.8%,κ值为0.786,也表明一致性良好。
结论
与手术标本相比,CNB显示出较高的诊断准确性,并且在ER、PR、HER2和Ki-67方面具有良好的一致性。我们的研究结果再次肯定了将CNB作为乳腺癌诊断的初始程序以及评估受体状态和内在生物学亚型以确定进一步治疗方案的建议。