Mumbardó-Adam Cristina, Guàrdia-Olmos Joan, Adam-Alcocer Ana L, Carbó-Carreté Maria, Balcells-Balcells Anna, Giné Climent, Shogren Karrie A
Cristina Mumbardó-Adam, Facultat de Psicologia, Ciències de l'Educació i de l'Esport, Universitat Ramon Llull.
Joan Guàrdia-Olmos, Facultat de Psicologia, Institut de Neurociències, Universitat de Barcelona.
Intellect Dev Disabil. 2017 Oct;55(5):303-314. doi: 10.1352/1934-9556-55.5.303.
The relation between self-determination and intellectual functioning is complex, as other contextual factors may also play significant roles in explaining variability in self-determination. This study used meta-analytic techniques to assess how self-determination measures vary between people with disabilities classified as having intellectual disability (ID) or not, and contextual variables that moderate this relation. The literature search yielded 16 eligible studies, whose variables of interest were coded and analyzed. The results showed that when comparing self-determination measures among disability classification groups, gender, disability label and race/ethnicity were associated with the effect size estimation. These findings empirically support the relevance of personal variables when understanding self-determination levels and their impact in the operational classification of ID.
自我决定与智力功能之间的关系很复杂，因为其他背景因素在解释自我决定的变异性方面也可能发挥重要作用。本研究使用元分析技术来评估被归类为有或没有智力残疾（ID）的残疾人之间自我决定测量的差异，以及调节这种关系的背景变量。文献检索产生了16项符合条件的研究，对其感兴趣的变量进行了编码和分析。结果表明，在比较残疾分类组之间的自我决定测量时，性别、残疾标签和种族/民族与效应量估计相关。这些发现从实证上支持了在理解自我决定水平及其在ID的操作分类中的影响时个人变量的相关性。
