Dickson Bradley M
Center for Epigenetics, Van Andel Research Institute , Grand Rapids, Michigan 49503, United States.
J Chem Theory Comput. 2017 Dec 12;13(12):5925-5932. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00821. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
Two problems associated with adaptively biased simulations are considered: overfilling and time scale estimation. First, a simple and computationally efficient procedure for limiting the bias fill-depth of any adaptive biasing potential is introduced. The resulting bias potential floods only up to a specified level and avoids bias accumulation in higher regions of free energy. Second, hyperdynamics can be invoked in combination with this depth-limited bias potential to estimate time scales. We argue that allowing the bias to equilibrate to a set depth is one crux in efficient hyperdynamics application. In both simple (alanine dipeptide) and complex (ligand residence) test cases, the useable boost factors are 6-8 times larger when the bias fill depth is directly controlled, as opposed to controlling the update frequency. Update frequency has emerged as a proxy for controlling the fill height of adaptive biases, with infrequent metadynamics being an example. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test is shown to be insufficient for determining the trustworthiness of a hyperdynamics simulation, and a more robust strategy is described. Overfill limiting and hyperdynamics have been added to the fABMACS project.
过度填充和时间尺度估计。首先,引入了一种简单且计算效率高的程序,用于限制任何自适应偏置势的偏置填充深度。由此产生的偏置势仅填充到指定水平,避免了自由能较高区域中的偏置积累。其次,可以将超动力学与这种深度受限的偏置势结合使用来估计时间尺度。我们认为,允许偏置平衡到设定深度是高效应用超动力学的一个关键。在简单(丙氨酸二肽)和复杂(配体驻留)测试案例中,与控制更新频率相比,当直接控制偏置填充深度时,可用的加速因子要大6 - 8倍。更新频率已成为控制自适应偏置填充高度的替代方法,例如不频繁的元动力学。结果表明,柯尔莫哥洛夫 - 斯米尔诺夫检验不足以确定超动力学模拟的可信度,并描述了一种更稳健的策略。过度填充限制和超动力学已被添加到fABMACS项目中。