Soleimani Aria, Heidari Neda, Habibi Mohammad Reza, Kiabi Farshad Hasanzadeh, Khademloo Mohammad, Emami Zeydi Amir, Sohrabi Fatemeh Bozorg
Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Student Research Committee, Faculty of Para-medicine, Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences, Sari, Iran.
Med Arch. 2017 Jun;71(3):198-203. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2017.71.198-203.
Anesthesia induction is often accompanied by a period of hemodynamic instability, which could be deleterious in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and left ventricular dysfunction undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the hemodynamic responses to propofol, etomidate, and diazepam following anesthesia induction, laryngoscopy and intubation in CABG surgery patients with low ejection fraction (EF).
A double-blind randomized, clinical study was performed on 150 patients with CAD and left ventricular dysfunction (EF≤35%) scheduled for elective CABG surgery with Cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). Patients were randomly allocated to three groups A, B, and C. These patients received propofol, etomidate or diazepam at induction of anesthesia, respectively. Hemodynamic variables (systolic and diastolic blood pressure [SBP, DBP], mean arterial pressure [MAP] and heart rate [HR]) were measured and recorded at baseline, immediately before laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation and one and three minutes after intubation.
One minute after induction and before laryngoscopy, there was a statistically significant decrease from the baseline in SBP, DBP and MAP in all three groups, but these variables in each hemodynamic parameters in diazepam group were less than other two groups (p<0.001). Moreover, the mean HR decreased in patients receiving propofol and etomidate one minute after induction and before laryngoscopy, but did not decreased in the diazepam group (p=0.005).
The present study showed that in patients undergoing CABG surgery with low EF, diazepam is more favorable in terms of hemodynamic stability compared to propofol and etomidate and this drug can be used safely for induction of anesthesia in patients with impaired ventricular function.
麻醉诱导常伴有一段时间的血流动力学不稳定,这对于接受冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)的冠心病(CAD)和左心室功能不全患者可能是有害的。本研究的目的是比较低射血分数(EF)的CABG手术患者在麻醉诱导、喉镜检查和插管后对丙泊酚、依托咪酯和地西泮的血流动力学反应。
对150例计划行择期CABG手术并使用体外循环(CPB)的CAD和左心室功能不全(EF≤35%)患者进行了一项双盲随机临床研究。患者被随机分为A、B、C三组。这些患者在麻醉诱导时分别接受丙泊酚、依托咪酯或地西泮。在基线、喉镜检查和气管插管前即刻以及插管后1分钟和3分钟测量并记录血流动力学变量(收缩压和舒张压[SBP、DBP]、平均动脉压[MAP]和心率[HR])。
诱导后1分钟且在喉镜检查前,三组患者的SBP、DBP和MAP均较基线有统计学意义的下降,但地西泮组各血流动力学参数的这些变量均低于其他两组(p<0.001)。此外,接受丙泊酚和依托咪酯的患者在诱导后1分钟且在喉镜检查前平均HR下降,但地西泮组未下降(p=0.005)。
本研究表明,在EF较低的CABG手术患者中,与丙泊酚和依托咪酯相比,地西泮在血流动力学稳定性方面更具优势,该药物可安全用于心室功能受损患者的麻醉诱导。