Department of Gastroenterology, Fukushima Medical University, School of Medicine, Fukushima 960-1247, Japan.
Department of Endoscopy, Fukushima Medical University Hospital, Fukushima 960-1247, Japan.
World J Gastroenterol. 2017 Sep 14;23(34):6273-6280. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v23.i34.6273.
To investigate the factors predictive of failure when placing a second biliary self-expandable metallic stents (SEMSs).
This study evaluated 65 patients with an unresectable malignant hilar biliary obstruction who were examined in our hospital. Sixty-two of these patients were recruited to the study and divided into two groups: the success group, which consisted of patients in whom a stent-in-stent SEMS had been placed successfully, and the failure group, which consisted of patients in whom the stent-in-stent SEMS had not been placed successfully. We compared the characteristics of the patients, the stricture state of their biliary ducts, and the implemented endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) procedures between the two groups.
The angle between the target biliary duct stricture and the first implanted SEMS was significantly larger in the failure group than in the success group. There were significantly fewer wire or dilation devices (ERCP catheter, dilator, or balloon catheter) passing the first SEMS cell in the failure group than in the success group. The cut-off value of the angle predicting stent-in-stent SEMS placement failure was 49.7 degrees according to the ROC curve (sensitivity 91.7%, specificity 61.2%). Furthermore, the angle was significantly smaller in patients with wire or dilation devices passing the first SEMS cell than in patients without wire or dilation devices passing the first SEMS cell.
A large angle was identified as a predictive factor for failure of stent-in-stent SEMS placement.
探讨放置第二枚胆道自膨式金属支架(SEMS)失败的预测因素。
本研究评估了 65 例无法切除的恶性肝门部胆管梗阻患者,其中 62 例患者被纳入研究并分为两组:成功组,支架内支架 SEMS 放置成功;失败组,支架内支架 SEMS 放置不成功。我们比较了两组患者的特征、胆管狭窄状态和实施的内镜逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)程序。
目标胆管狭窄与第一枚植入 SEMS 之间的夹角在失败组明显大于成功组。在失败组中,通过第一枚 SEMS 细胞的导丝或扩张器械(ERCP 导管、扩张器或球囊导管)明显少于成功组。根据 ROC 曲线,预测支架内支架 SEMS 放置失败的角度截断值为 49.7 度(灵敏度 91.7%,特异性 61.2%)。此外,在通过第一枚 SEMS 细胞的导丝或扩张器械的患者中,角度明显小于没有通过第一枚 SEMS 细胞的导丝或扩张器械的患者。
大角度被确定为支架内支架 SEMS 放置失败的预测因素。