Department of Ecology, Environment & Evolution, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, 3086, Australia.
Department of Biological Sciences, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70803, USA.
Ecology. 2018 Jan;99(1):36-46. doi: 10.1002/ecy.2039. Epub 2017 Nov 17.
The emergent properties of the collection of species in a natural community, such as diversity and the distribution of relative abundances, are influenced by both niche-based and neutral (stochastic) processes. This pluralistic view of the natural world reconciles theory with empirical observations better than does either a strictly niche- or neutrality-based perspective. Even so, rules (or rules of thumb) that govern the relative contributions that niche-based and stochastic processes make as communities assemble remain only vaguely formulated and incompletely tested. For example, the translation of non-random (non-neutral) ecological processes, which differentially sort among species within a community, into species-compositional patterns may occur more influentially within some demographic subsets of organisms than within others. In other words, the relative contributions of niche vs. neutral processes may vary among age-, size-, or stage-classes. For example, non-random patterns of mortality that occur among seedlings in a rain forest, or among newly settled juveniles in communities of sessile marine communities, could be more influential than non-random mortality during later stages in determining overall community diversity. We propose two alternative, mutually compatible, hypotheses to account for different levels of influence from mortality among life-cycle stages toward producing non-random patterns in organismal communities. The Turnover Model simply posits that those demographic classes characterized by faster rates of turnover contribute greater influence in the short-term as sufficient mortality gives rise to non-random changes to the community, as well as over the longer-term as multiple individuals of a given fast-turnover demographic class transition into later classes compared to each individual that ratchets from a slow-turnover starting class into a later class. The Turnover Model should apply to most communities of organisms. The Niche Model, which posits that niche-based processes are more influential in some demographic classes relative to others, may alternatively or additionally apply to communities. We also propose several alternative mechanisms, especially relevant to forest trees, that could cause dynamics consistent with the Niche Model. These mechanisms depend on differences among demographic classes in the extent of demographic variation that individual organisms experience through their trait values or neighborhood conditions.
自然群落中物种集合的涌现特性,如多样性和相对丰度的分布,受到基于生态位和中性(随机)过程的影响。这种对自然世界的多元化观点比严格基于生态位或中性的观点更好地调和了理论与经验观察。即便如此,支配基于生态位和随机过程的相对贡献的规则(或经验法则),在群落组装时仍然只是模糊制定的,而且尚未经过充分检验。例如,在物种组成模式中,对物种进行差异排序的非随机(非中性)生态过程的转化,可能在某些生物种群的某些生命阶段比其他阶段更具影响力。换句话说,生态位与中性过程的相对贡献可能因年龄、大小或阶段类别而异。例如,在热带雨林中的幼苗或固着海洋生物群落中新定居的幼体中发生的非随机死亡率模式,可能比在生命后期阶段发生的非随机死亡率对确定整体群落多样性更具影响力。我们提出了两种替代的、相互兼容的假设,以解释生命周期各阶段的死亡率对产生生物体群落中非随机模式的不同层次的影响。周转率模型简单地假定,那些具有较快周转率的种群特征在短期内具有更大的影响力,因为足够的死亡率会导致群落发生非随机变化,而且在较长时间内,由于给定的快速周转率种群类别的多个个体过渡到后期类群,而不是每个从缓慢周转率起始类群过渡到后期类群的个体,都会对群落产生更大的影响。周转率模型应该适用于大多数生物体群落。生态位模型则假定,在某些种群类别中,基于生态位的过程比其他过程更具影响力,或者可以替代或补充群落。我们还提出了几种替代机制,特别是对森林树木来说,这些机制可能导致与生态位模型一致的动态。这些机制取决于个体生物通过其特征值或邻域条件经历的种群变化程度在不同种群类别之间的差异。