Department of Pediatrics, Riley Hospital for Children at Indiana University Health, Indianapolis, IN.
Department of Pediatrics, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
Acad Emerg Med. 2018 Feb;25(2):177-185. doi: 10.1111/acem.13329. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
More than 30 million children are cared for across 5,000 U.S. emergency departments (EDs) each year. Most of these EDs are not facilities designed and operated solely for children. A Web-based survey provided a national and state-by-state assessment of pediatric readiness and noted a national average score was 69 on a 100-point scale. This survey noted wide variations in ED readiness with scores ranging from 61 in low-pediatric-volume EDs to 90 in the high-pediatric-volume EDs. Additionally, the mean score at the state level ranged from 57 (Wyoming) to 83 (Florida) and for individual EDs ranged from 22 to 100. The majority of prior efforts made to improve pediatric readiness have involved providing Web-based resources and online toolkits. This article reports on the first year of a program that aimed to improve pediatric readiness across community hospitals in our state through in situ simulation-based assessment facilitated by our academic medical center. The primary aim was to improve the pediatric readiness scores in the 10 participating hospitals. The secondary aim was to explore the correlation of simulation-based performance of hospital teams with pediatric readiness scores.
This interventional study measured the Pediatric Readiness Survey (PRS) prior to and after implementation of an improvement program. This program consisted of three components: 1) in situ simulations, 2) report-outs, and 3) access to online pediatric readiness resources and content experts. The simulations were conducted in situ (in the ED resuscitation bay) by multiprofessional teams of doctors, nurses, respiratory therapists, and technicians. Simulations and debriefings were facilitated by an expert team from a pediatric academic medical center. Three scenarios were conducted for all teams and include: a 6-month-old with respiratory failure, an 8-year-old with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA), and a 6-month-old with supraventricular tachycardia (SVT). A performance score was calculated for each scenario. The improvement of PRS was compared before and after the simulation program. The correlation of the simulation performance of each hospital and the PRS was calculated.
Forty-one multiprofessional teams from 10 EDs in Indiana participated in the study, five were of medium pediatric volume and five were medium- to high-volume EDs. The PRS significantly improved from the first to the second on-site verification assessment (58.4 ± 4.8 to 74.7 ± 2.9, p = 0.009). Total adherence scores to scenario guidelines were 54.7, 56.4, and 62.4% in the respiratory failure, DKA, and SVT scenarios, respectively. We found no correlation between simulation performance and PRS scores. Medium ED pediatric volume significantly predicted higher PRS scores compared to medium-high pediatric ED volume (β = 8.7; confidence interval = 0.72-16.8, p = 0.034).
Our collaborative improvement program that involved simulation was associated with improvement in pediatric readiness scores in 10 EDs participating statewide. Future work will focus on further expanding of the network and establishing a national model for pediatric readiness improvement.
每年有超过 3000 万儿童在美国的 5000 家急诊部(ED)接受护理。这些 ED 大多不是专为儿童设计和运营的设施。一项基于网络的调查对儿科准备情况进行了全国和按州评估,并指出 100 分制的平均得分为 69 分。该调查指出 ED 准备情况存在广泛差异,得分从低儿科量 ED 的 61 分到高儿科量 ED 的 90 分不等。此外,州一级的平均得分范围从 57(怀俄明州)到 83(佛罗里达州),个别 ED 的得分范围从 22 到 100。此前为提高儿科准备情况而做出的大多数努力都涉及提供基于网络的资源和在线工具包。本文报告了一项计划的第一年情况,该计划旨在通过我们的学术医疗中心进行的现场模拟评估来提高我们州社区医院的儿科准备情况。主要目标是提高 10 家参与医院的儿科准备情况得分。次要目标是探讨医院团队的模拟表现与儿科准备情况得分之间的相关性。
这项干预性研究在实施改进计划之前和之后测量了儿科准备情况调查(PRS)。该计划由三个部分组成:1)现场模拟,2)报告,3)访问在线儿科准备资源和内容专家。模拟由来自儿科学术医疗中心的多专业医生、护士、呼吸治疗师和技术人员团队在现场(ED 复苏室)进行。模拟和汇报由儿科学术医疗中心的专家团队协助进行。所有团队都进行了三个场景,包括:一个 6 个月大的呼吸衰竭婴儿、一个 8 岁的糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)患儿和一个 6 个月大的室上性心动过速(SVT)患儿。为每个场景计算了绩效得分。比较了模拟计划前后 PRS 的改善情况。计算了每个医院的模拟表现与 PRS 的相关性。
印第安纳州 10 个 ED 的 41 个多专业团队参加了这项研究,其中 5 个是中等儿科量 ED,5 个是中等到高儿科量 ED。PR 从第一次现场验证评估的 58.4±4.8 到第二次的 74.7±2.9 显著提高(p=0.009)。在呼吸衰竭、DKA 和 SVT 场景中,对方案指南的总依从性评分分别为 54.7、56.4 和 62.4%。我们没有发现模拟表现与 PRS 得分之间的相关性。与中高儿科 ED 量相比,中等 ED 儿科量显著预测 PRS 得分更高(β=8.7;置信区间=0.72-16.8,p=0.034)。
我们参与的涉及模拟的协作改进计划与全州参与的 10 个 ED 的儿科准备情况得分提高有关。未来的工作将重点进一步扩大网络并建立儿科准备情况改进的全国模式。