• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

数字PCR检测晚期肺腺癌患者低水平表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的评估:一项跨平台比较研究

Evaluation of digital PCR for detecting low-level EGFR mutations in advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients: a cross-platform comparison study.

作者信息

Gu Jincui, Zang Wanchun, Liu Bing, Li Lei, Huang Lixia, Li Shaoli, Rao Guanhua, Yu Yang, Zhou Yanbin

机构信息

Department of Respiratory Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.

Novogene Bioinformatics Institute, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Oncotarget. 2017 Jun 29;8(40):67810-67820. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18866. eCollection 2017 Sep 15.

DOI:10.18632/oncotarget.18866
PMID:28978074
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5620214/
Abstract

Emerging evidence has indicated that circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from plasma could be used to analyze EGFR mutation status for NSCLC patients; however, due to the low level of ctDNA in plasma, highly sensitive approaches are required to detect low frequency mutations. In addition, the cutoff for the mutation abundance that can be detected in tumor tissue but cannot be detected in matched ctDNA is still unknown. To assess a highly sensitive method, we evaluated the use of digital PCR in the detection of EGFR mutations in tumor tissue from 47 advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients through comparison with NGS and ARMS. We determined the degree of concordance between tumor tissue DNA and paired ctDNA and analyzed the mutation abundance relationship between them. Digital PCR and Proton had a high sensitivity (96.00% vs. 100%) compared with that of ARMS in the detection of mutations in tumor tissue. Digital PCR outperformed Proton in identifying more low abundance mutations. The ctDNA detection rate of digital PCR was 87.50% in paired tumor tissue with a mutation abundance above 5% and 7.59% in paired tumor tissue with a mutation abundance below 5%. When the DNA mutation abundance of tumor tissue was above 3.81%, it could identify mutations in paired ctDNA with a high sensitivity. Digital PCR will help identify alternative methods for detecting low abundance mutations in tumor tissue DNA and plasma ctDNA.

摘要

新出现的证据表明,血浆中的循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)可用于分析非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变状态;然而,由于血浆中ctDNA水平较低,需要高灵敏度的方法来检测低频突变。此外,肿瘤组织中可检测到但匹配的ctDNA中无法检测到的突变丰度阈值仍然未知。为了评估一种高灵敏度方法,我们通过与二代测序(NGS)和扩增阻滞突变系统(ARMS)比较,评估了数字PCR在检测47例晚期肺腺癌患者肿瘤组织中EGFR突变的应用。我们确定了肿瘤组织DNA与配对ctDNA之间的一致性程度,并分析了它们之间的突变丰度关系。在检测肿瘤组织中的突变时,与ARMS相比,数字PCR和Proton具有较高的灵敏度(分别为96.00%和100%)。在识别更多低丰度突变方面,数字PCR优于Proton。在配对的肿瘤组织中,当突变丰度高于5%时,数字PCR的ctDNA检测率为87.50%;当突变丰度低于5%时,检测率为7.59%。当肿瘤组织的DNA突变丰度高于3.81%时,它可以高灵敏度地识别配对ctDNA中的突变。数字PCR将有助于确定检测肿瘤组织DNA和血浆ctDNA中低丰度突变的替代方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8e5/5620214/0abcf353dae0/oncotarget-08-67810-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8e5/5620214/258757a8a247/oncotarget-08-67810-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8e5/5620214/f518e45942c5/oncotarget-08-67810-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8e5/5620214/bce09aa4fa24/oncotarget-08-67810-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8e5/5620214/0abcf353dae0/oncotarget-08-67810-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8e5/5620214/258757a8a247/oncotarget-08-67810-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8e5/5620214/f518e45942c5/oncotarget-08-67810-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8e5/5620214/bce09aa4fa24/oncotarget-08-67810-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c8e5/5620214/0abcf353dae0/oncotarget-08-67810-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of digital PCR for detecting low-level EGFR mutations in advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients: a cross-platform comparison study.数字PCR检测晚期肺腺癌患者低水平表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变的评估:一项跨平台比较研究
Oncotarget. 2017 Jun 29;8(40):67810-67820. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18866. eCollection 2017 Sep 15.
2
[Clinical value of droplet digital polymerase chain reaction method in detecting plasma circulating tumor deoxyribonucleic acid epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in advanced pulmonary adenocarcinoma patients].[液滴数字聚合酶链反应法检测晚期肺腺癌患者血浆循环肿瘤脱氧核糖核酸表皮生长因子受体突变的临床价值]
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2018 Aug 7;98(29):2336-2340. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2018.29.012.
3
Comparison of mutations detected by LNA-ARMS PCR in plasma ctDNA samples and matched tissue sample in non-small cell lung cancer patients.非小细胞肺癌患者血浆循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)样本与匹配组织样本中通过锁核酸-扩增阻滞突变系统(LNA-ARMS)聚合酶链反应(PCR)检测到的突变比较
Am J Transl Res. 2022 Aug 15;14(8):5605-5613. eCollection 2022.
4
Comparison of the SuperARMS and Droplet Digital PCR for Detecting EGFR Mutation in ctDNA From NSCLC Patients.用于检测非小细胞肺癌患者循环肿瘤DNA中表皮生长因子受体突变的超级扩增阻滞突变系统与液滴数字PCR的比较
Transl Oncol. 2018 Apr;11(2):542-545. doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2018.02.007. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
5
Validation of a highly sensitive Sanger sequencing in detecting EGFR mutations from circulating tumor DNA in patients with lung cancers.利用高灵敏度 Sanger 测序技术从肺癌患者循环肿瘤 DNA 中检测 EGFR 突变的验证。
Clin Chim Acta. 2022 Nov 1;536:98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2022.08.030. Epub 2022 Sep 23.
6
A large-scale, multicentered trial evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of digital PCR versus ARMS-PCR for detecting ctDNA-based p.T790M in non-small-cell lung cancer patients.一项评估数字PCR与ARMS-PCR检测非小细胞肺癌患者基于循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)的p.T790M的敏感性和特异性的大规模多中心试验。
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2021 Oct;10(10):3888-3901. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-21-564.
7
Detection of EGFR Mutations in Plasma cfDNA and Paired CTCs of NSCLC Patients before and after Osimertinib Therapy Using Crystal Digital PCR.使用晶体数字PCR检测奥希替尼治疗前后非小细胞肺癌患者血浆循环游离DNA和配对循环肿瘤细胞中的表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变
Cancers (Basel). 2021 May 31;13(11):2736. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112736.
8
A comparison of QuantStudio™ 3D Digital PCR and ARMS-PCR for measuring plasma EGFR T790M mutations of NSCLC patients.用于检测非小细胞肺癌患者血浆中表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)T790M突变的QuantStudio™ 3D数字PCR与扩增阻滞突变系统PCR(ARMS-PCR)的比较
Cancer Manag Res. 2018 Jan 18;10:115-121. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S148134. eCollection 2018.
9
Effect of icotinib on advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with sensitive mutation detected in ctDNA by ddPCR.埃克替尼对通过数字滴度PCR在循环肿瘤DNA中检测到敏感突变的晚期肺腺癌患者的疗效。
Transl Cancer Res. 2019 Dec;8(8):2858-2863. doi: 10.21037/tcr.2019.10.48.
10
Comparative Analysis of Two Methods for the Detection of Mutations in Plasma Circulating Tumor DNA from Lung Adenocarcinoma Patients.两种检测肺腺癌患者血浆循环肿瘤DNA中突变方法的比较分析
Cancers (Basel). 2019 Jun 10;11(6):803. doi: 10.3390/cancers11060803.

引用本文的文献

1
Profiling Cell-Free DNA from Malignant Pleural Effusion for Oncogenic Driver Mutations in Patients with Treatment-Naive Stage IV Adenocarcinoma: A Multicenter Prospective Study.对未经治疗的 IV 期腺癌患者的恶性胸腔积液中的游离 DNA 进行致癌驱动基因突变分析:一项多中心前瞻性研究。
Mol Diagn Ther. 2024 Nov;28(6):803-810. doi: 10.1007/s40291-024-00736-8. Epub 2024 Aug 15.
2
Overview on Therapeutic Options in Uncommon EGFR Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): New Lights for an Unmet Medical Need.罕见 EGFR 突变非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)治疗选择概述:未满足的医疗需求的新曙光。
Int J Mol Sci. 2023 May 17;24(10):8878. doi: 10.3390/ijms24108878.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Total DNA input is a crucial determinant of the sensitivity of plasma cell-free DNA EGFR mutation detection using droplet digital PCR.总DNA输入量是使用液滴数字PCR检测浆细胞游离DNA表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)突变敏感性的关键决定因素。
Oncotarget. 2017 Jan 24;8(4):5861-5873. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14390.
2
Osimertinib for pretreated EGFR Thr790Met-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (AURA2): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 study.奥希替尼治疗预处理 EGFR Thr790Met 阳性的晚期非小细胞肺癌(AURA2):一项多中心、开放标签、单臂、2 期研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Dec;17(12):1643-1652. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30508-3. Epub 2016 Oct 14.
3
Chip-based digital Polymerase Chain Reaction as quantitative technique for the detection of mutations in breast cancer patients.
基于芯片的数字聚合酶链反应作为检测乳腺癌患者基因突变的定量技术。
Heliyon. 2022 Nov 3;8(11):e11396. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11396. eCollection 2022 Nov.
4
The diagnostic accuracy of digital PCR, ARMS and NGS for detecting KRAS mutation in cell-free DNA of patients with colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.数字 PCR、ARMS 和 NGS 检测结直肠癌患者循环游离 DNA 中 KRAS 突变的诊断准确性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 26;16(3):e0248775. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248775. eCollection 2021.
5
Assessment of gene mutations in circulating free DNA in monitoring of response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.评估循环游离DNA中的基因突变在监测肺腺癌患者对表皮生长因子受体酪氨酸激酶抑制剂反应中的作用
Arch Med Sci. 2019 Nov 3;16(6):1496-1500. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2019.89217. eCollection 2020.
6
Case Report: A Chronological Combination Treatment of Icotinib, Osimertinib, and Crizotinib on Lung Adenocarcinoma Guided by Serial Genetic Tests of Circulating Tumor DNA and Sediment Cell Genomic DNA From Pleural Effusion.病例报告:基于循环肿瘤DNA及胸腔积液沉淀细胞基因组DNA的系列基因检测指导下,对肺腺癌序贯联合应用埃克替尼、奥希替尼和克唑替尼的治疗
Front Oncol. 2020 Oct 23;10:561341. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2020.561341. eCollection 2020.
7
CRISPR-Cas deployment in non-small cell lung cancer for target screening, validations, and discoveries.CRISPR-Cas 在非小细胞肺癌中的应用,用于靶标筛选、验证和发现。
Cancer Gene Ther. 2021 Jun;28(6):566-580. doi: 10.1038/s41417-020-00256-7. Epub 2020 Nov 15.
8
A multicenter real-world study of tumor-derived DNA from pleural effusion supernatant in genomic profiling of advanced lung cancer.一项关于晚期肺癌基因组分析中胸腔积液上清液肿瘤源性DNA的多中心真实世界研究。
Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2020 Aug;9(4):1507-1515. doi: 10.21037/tlcr-20-882.
9
Ultra-deep massively parallel sequencing with unique molecular identifier tagging achieves comparable performance to droplet digital PCR for detection and quantification of circulating tumor DNA from lung cancer patients.采用独特分子标识符标记的超深度大规模平行测序与数字液滴 PCR 检测和定量肺癌患者循环肿瘤 DNA 的性能相当。
PLoS One. 2019 Dec 16;14(12):e0226193. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0226193. eCollection 2019.
10
Tumor-derived DNA from pleural effusion supernatant as a promising alternative to tumor tissue in genomic profiling of advanced lung cancer.胸腔积液上清液中的肿瘤衍生 DNA 作为晚期肺癌基因组分析中肿瘤组织的有前途的替代物。
Theranostics. 2019 Jul 28;9(19):5532-5541. doi: 10.7150/thno.34070. eCollection 2019.
Rebiopsy for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer after epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor failure.
表皮生长因子受体-酪氨酸激酶抑制剂治疗失败后非小细胞肺癌患者的再次活检
Cancer Sci. 2016 Jul;107(7):1001-5. doi: 10.1111/cas.12963. Epub 2016 Jun 21.
4
Tumor cells can follow distinct evolutionary paths to become resistant to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibition.肿瘤细胞可以沿着不同的进化路径对表皮生长因子受体抑制产生抗性。
Nat Med. 2016 Mar;22(3):262-9. doi: 10.1038/nm.4040. Epub 2016 Feb 1.
5
EGFR mutation detection in ctDNA from NSCLC patient plasma: A cross-platform comparison of leading technologies to support the clinical development of AZD9291.非小细胞肺癌患者血浆中循环肿瘤DNA的表皮生长因子受体突变检测:支持AZD9291临床开发的领先技术的跨平台比较
Lung Cancer. 2015 Dec;90(3):509-15. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2015.10.004. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
6
A 2015 update on predictive molecular pathology and its role in targeted cancer therapy: a review focussing on clinical relevance.2015年预测性分子病理学及其在靶向癌症治疗中的作用更新:聚焦临床相关性的综述
Cancer Gene Ther. 2015 Sep;22(9):417-30. doi: 10.1038/cgt.2015.39. Epub 2015 Sep 11.
7
AZD9291 in EGFR inhibitor-resistant non-small-cell lung cancer.阿法替尼治疗表皮生长因子受体抑制剂耐药的非小细胞肺癌
N Engl J Med. 2015 Apr 30;372(18):1689-99. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1411817.
8
Ultra-Sensitive Detection of the Pretreatment EGFR T790M Mutation in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with an EGFR-Activating Mutation Using Droplet Digital PCR.采用液滴数字 PCR 技术对有 EGFR 激活突变的非小细胞肺癌患者进行预处理 EGFR T790M 突变的超灵敏检测。
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Aug 1;21(15):3552-60. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-2151. Epub 2015 Apr 16.
9
Characterizing the patterns of clonal selection in circulating tumor DNA from patients with colorectal cancer refractory to anti-EGFR treatment.对难治性抗表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)治疗的结直肠癌患者循环肿瘤DNA中的克隆选择模式进行表征。
Ann Oncol. 2015 Apr;26(4):731-736. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdv005. Epub 2015 Jan 26.
10
Circulating tumor DNA is effective for the detection of EGFR mutation in non-small cell lung cancer: a meta-analysis.循环肿瘤DNA在非小细胞肺癌表皮生长因子受体突变检测中具有有效性:一项荟萃分析。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2015 Jan;24(1):206-12. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-14-0895. Epub 2014 Oct 22.