Shibuya Yoichiro, Matsumoto Go, Sasaki Masahiro, Sasaki Kaoru, Adachi Koji, Sekido Mitsuru
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Amakubo, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Hitachiomiya Saiseikai Hospital, Tagonaicho, Hitachiomiya, Ibarai, Japan.
Rural Remote Health. 2017 Oct-Dec;17(4):4159. doi: 10.22605/RRH4159. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
In rural areas with few doctors, Penrose drains in minor surgeries for soft tissue trauma or small subcutaneous tumors are sometimes avoided, even though the drain would prevent hematoma, because of the limited availability of professional postsurgical care. The authors developed a simple fixation method for Penrose drains that can be used even in remote areas where a doctor is not present to remove the drain. A retrospective study was conducted to compare this new method of fixing Penrose drains with instances in which the Penrose drain was fixed to skin by conventional suturing.
The medical records of patients who underwent minor surgeries using Penrose drains were reviewed. The surgeries were performed from April 2012 to March 2015 in remote outpatient clinics in Ibaraki Prefecture, Japan. The cases were divided into two groups: those using the new method, in which the Penrose drains were sewn onto the wound dressings and could be automatically removed while changing the dressing, and those in which the Penrose drains were conventionally fixed to the skin and removed one or several days after surgery by another doctor at the outpatient clinic. The rates of drain-related complications and of automatic drain removal (ie removal without a doctor's assistance) between the two groups were compared.
A total of 54 Penrose drains used for 48 lesions in 44 patients (25 men, 19 women) in the new-method group, and 36 Penrose drains for 25 lesions in 21 patients (12 men, 9 women) in the conventional-method (control) group were analyzed. All 54 Penrose drains in the new-method group were removed automatically, while none of the 36 drains in the control group were removed automatically. There were no drain-related complications, such as massive hematoma, retrograde infection, seroma, or drain breakage or straying, in any of the new-method or control cases.
This new Penrose-drain fixation method is safe and is particularly suitable for minor surgeries in rural areas where there are no resident doctors. The wide use of this method for appropriate minor surgeries in doctorless rural areas has the potential to reduce surgical complications and the time burden for both patients and surgeons.
在医生数量稀少的农村地区,即便彭罗斯引流管可预防血肿,但由于术后专业护理资源有限,软组织创伤或小皮下肿瘤的小手术有时会避免使用彭罗斯引流管。作者开发了一种简单的彭罗斯引流管固定方法,即使在没有医生在场拆除引流管的偏远地区也可使用。进行了一项回顾性研究,以比较这种固定彭罗斯引流管的新方法与通过传统缝合将彭罗斯引流管固定于皮肤的情况。
回顾了使用彭罗斯引流管进行小手术的患者的病历。这些手术于2012年4月至2015年3月在日本茨城县的偏远门诊进行。病例分为两组:一组使用新方法,即将彭罗斯引流管缝在伤口敷料上,换药时可自动拆除;另一组采用传统方法将彭罗斯引流管固定于皮肤,术后由门诊的另一位医生在术后一天或数天拆除。比较两组之间与引流管相关的并发症发生率和引流管自动拆除率(即无需医生协助拆除)。
新方法组中,44例患者(25名男性,19名女性)的48个病灶使用了54根彭罗斯引流管,传统方法(对照组)组中,21例患者(12名男性,9名女性)的25个病灶使用了36根彭罗斯引流管。新方法组的所有54根彭罗斯引流管均自动拆除,而对照组的36根引流管均未自动拆除。新方法组和对照组的任何病例中均未出现与引流管相关的并发症,如大量血肿、逆行感染、血清肿或引流管断裂或移位。
这种新的彭罗斯引流管固定方法是安全的,特别适用于没有常驻医生的农村地区的小手术。在没有医生的农村地区,将这种方法广泛应用于合适的小手术有可能减少手术并发症以及患者和外科医生的时间负担。