Suppr超能文献

农药残留分析能力验证中参与者结果的赋值、测试样品加标浓度与同位素稀释质谱结果的比较。

Comparison of Assigned Values from Participants' Results, Spiked Concentrations of Test Samples, and Isotope Dilution Mass Spectrometric Results in Proficiency Testing for Pesticide Residue Analysis.

作者信息

Yarita Takashi, Otake Takamitsu, Aoyagi Yoshie, Takasaka Noriko, Suzuki Tatsuya, Watanabe Takaho

机构信息

National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ), AIST Tsukuba Central 3, 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8563, Japan.

Food and Drug Safety Center (FDSC), Hatano Research Institute (HRI), 729-5 Ochiai, Hadano, Kanagawa 257-8523, Japan.

出版信息

J AOAC Int. 2018 Jul 1;101(4):1199-1204. doi: 10.5740/jaoacint.17-0218. Epub 2017 Oct 4.

Abstract

The Hatano Research Institute (HRI) at the Food and Drug Safety Center has recently organized a series of proficiency-testing (PT) programs called the "External Quality Control for Food Hygiene" in order to evaluate the analytical capability of testing laboratories that inspect food samples in accordance with the Food Sanitation Act. In one of these programs, Pesticide I, consensus values calculated from the participants' analytical results were used as assigned values, and the spiked concentrations of the prepared test samples were used for evaluating variation among individual participants. In the present study, the values obtained in the 2013-2015 rounds have been assessed by comparing the analytical results of the target pesticides obtained by using two different isotope-dilution MS (IDMS) methods. These two IDMS methods are based on a combination of different pretreatment protocols and different GC separation columns. The weighted means of the observed analytical results were higher than the corresponding assigned values, but showed good agreement with the spiked concentrations. These results indicate that the spiking concentrations of the test sample from HRI are reliable, and therefore, these values can be used to evaluate the trueness of the participants' analytical method.

摘要

食品药品安全中心的波多野研究所(HRI)最近组织了一系列名为“食品卫生外部质量控制”的能力验证(PT)项目,以评估依据《食品卫生法》对食品样本进行检测的实验室的分析能力。在其中一个项目“农药I”中,根据参与者的分析结果计算得出的共识值被用作指定值,制备的测试样本的加标浓度用于评估各个参与者之间的差异。在本研究中,通过比较使用两种不同的同位素稀释质谱(IDMS)方法获得的目标农药的分析结果,对2013 - 2015轮获得的值进行了评估。这两种IDMS方法基于不同的预处理方案和不同的气相色谱分离柱的组合。观察到的分析结果的加权平均值高于相应的指定值,但与加标浓度显示出良好的一致性。这些结果表明,来自HRI的测试样本的加标浓度是可靠的,因此,这些值可用于评估参与者分析方法的准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验