• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

多支冠状动脉疾病合并非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者的长期预后

Long-term outcomes of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease presenting non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

作者信息

Desperak Piotr, Hawranek Michał, Gąsior Paweł, Desperak Aneta, Lekston Andrzej, Gąsior Mariusz

机构信息

3rd Chair and Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, School of Medicine with the Division of Dentistry in Zabrze, Silesian Centre for Heart Diseases, Zabrze, Poland.

Division of Cardiology and Structural Heart Diseases, Medical University of Silesia in Katowice, Katowice, Poland.

出版信息

Cardiol J. 2019;26(2):157-168. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2017.0110. Epub 2017 Oct 5.

DOI:10.5603/CJ.a2017.0110
PMID:28980282
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8086658/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is paucity of data concerning the optimal revascularization in patients with mul- tivessel coronary artery disease (CAD) presenting non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). The aim was to evaluate long-term outcomes of patients with multivessel CAD presenting NSTE-ACS depending on the management after coronary angiography.

METHODS

3,166 patients with NSTE-ACS hospitalized between 2006 and 2014 were screened. After ex- clusions, 1,342 patients were enrolled with multivessel CAD and were divided depending on their man- agement after coronary angiography; the medical-only therapy group (n = 91), the percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) group (n = 1,122), the coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) group (n = 129). Propensity scores matching was used to adjust for differences in patient baseline characteristics.

RESULTS

After propensity score analysis, 273 well-matched patients were chosen. Both before and after matching, patients treated with a medical-only therapy were burdened with the highest percentage of 24-month all-cause death and non-fatal MI in comparison to PCI and CABG groups, respectively. In the CABG group, ACS-driven revascularization rate was lowest. In the overall population, PCI (HR 0.33; 95% CI 0.20-0.53; p < 0.0001) and CABG (HR 0.54; 95% CI 0.31-0.93; p = 0.028) were independent factors associated with favorable 24-month prognosis. However, in a matched population only PCI was an independent predictor of long-term prognosis with a 63% decrease of 24-month mortal- ity (HR 0.37; 95% CI 0.19-0.69; p = 0.0020).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with multivessel CAD presenting with NSTE-ACS, medical-only man- agement is related with adverse long-term prognosis in contrast to revascularization, which reduces 24-month mortality, especially among patients undergoing percutaneous intervention. Performance of PCI is an independent factor for improving long-term prognosis.

摘要

背景

关于多支冠状动脉疾病(CAD)合并非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征(NSTE-ACS)患者的最佳血运重建治疗,相关数据较少。本研究旨在根据冠状动脉造影后的治疗方式,评估多支CAD合并NSTE-ACS患者的长期预后。

方法

对2006年至2014年期间住院的3166例NSTE-ACS患者进行筛查。排除后,1342例多支CAD患者入组,并根据冠状动脉造影后的治疗方式分为单纯药物治疗组(n = 91)、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)组(n = 1122)、冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)组(n = 129)。采用倾向评分匹配法调整患者基线特征的差异。

结果

经过倾向评分分析,选择了273例匹配良好的患者。在匹配前后,与PCI组和CABG组相比,单纯药物治疗的患者24个月全因死亡和非致死性心肌梗死的发生率最高。在CABG组中,ACS驱动的血运重建率最低。在总体人群中,PCI(HR 0.33;95%CI 0.20 - 0.53;p < 0.0001)和CABG(HR 0.54;95%CI 0.31 - 0.93;p = 0.028)是与24个月良好预后相关的独立因素。然而,在匹配人群中,只有PCI是长期预后的独立预测因素,24个月死亡率降低63%(HR 0.37;95%CI 0.19 - 0.69;p = 0.0020)。

结论

对于多支CAD合并NSTE-ACS的患者,与血运重建治疗相比,单纯药物治疗与不良的长期预后相关,血运重建治疗可降低24个月死亡率,尤其是在接受经皮介入治疗的患者中。PCI治疗是改善长期预后的独立因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cbe/8086658/988222f4fb42/cardj-26-2-157f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cbe/8086658/d46b9d77fae1/cardj-26-2-157f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cbe/8086658/6f0a5854af44/cardj-26-2-157f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cbe/8086658/988222f4fb42/cardj-26-2-157f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cbe/8086658/d46b9d77fae1/cardj-26-2-157f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cbe/8086658/6f0a5854af44/cardj-26-2-157f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cbe/8086658/988222f4fb42/cardj-26-2-157f3.jpg

相似文献

1
Long-term outcomes of patients with multivessel coronary artery disease presenting non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.多支冠状动脉疾病合并非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者的长期预后
Cardiol J. 2019;26(2):157-168. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2017.0110. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
2
Comparison of multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting in patients with severe coronary artery disease presenting with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.比较多支血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术在伴有非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征的严重冠状动脉疾病患者中的应用。
Kardiol Pol. 2018;76(10):1474-1481. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2018.0151. Epub 2018 Sep 25.
3
Comparison of stenting and surgical revascularization strategy in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes and complex coronary artery disease (from the Milestone Registry).非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征和复杂冠状动脉疾病中支架置入与血管重建策略的比较(来自里程碑注册研究)。
Am J Cardiol. 2014 Oct 1;114(7):979-87. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2014.07.008. Epub 2014 Jul 16.
4
Long-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention relative to bypass surgery in diabetic patients with multivessel coronary artery disease according to clinical presentation.根据临床表现,糖尿病多支血管病变患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与旁路手术治疗的长期预后比较。
Coron Artery Dis. 2020 Mar;31(2):174-183. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0000000000000767.
5
Multivessel vs. culprit-only revascularization in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes and multivessel coronary disease.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征合并多支冠状动脉疾病患者的多支血管与仅罪犯血管血运重建
Rev Port Cardiol (Engl Ed). 2018 Feb;37(2):143-154. doi: 10.1016/j.repc.2017.05.010. Epub 2018 Feb 25.
6
Early and long-term outcomes of complete revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease presenting with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.多支冠状动脉疾病合并非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗实现完全血运重建的早期和长期结果
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2018;14(1):32-41. doi: 10.5114/aic.2018.74353. Epub 2018 Mar 22.
7
Meta-analysis Comparing Multivessel Versus Culprit Coronary Arterial Revascularization for Patients With Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes.多血管与罪犯血管血运重建治疗非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者的荟萃分析
Am J Cardiol. 2019 Nov 15;124(10):1501-1511. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.07.071. Epub 2019 Aug 29.
8
Long-Term Outcomes of Single-Vessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention on Culprit Vessel vs. Multivessel Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients With Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease.多支血管病变非 ST 段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗罪犯血管与多支血管病变的长期预后比较。
Circ J. 2021 Jan 25;85(2):185-193. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0369. Epub 2021 Jan 9.
9
Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Complete Revascularization Improves the Prognosis in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Severe Nonculprit Disease: A DANAMI 3-PRIMULTI Substudy (Primary PCI in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: Treatment of Culprit Lesion Only or Complete Revascularization).血流储备分数指导下的完全血运重建改善 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并严重非罪犯病变患者的预后:DANAMI 3-PRIMULTI 子研究(ST 段抬高型心肌梗死合并多支血管病变患者的直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:仅治疗罪犯病变还是完全血运重建)
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Apr;10(4). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.116.004460.
10
Comparison of Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征冠状动脉旁路移植术与药物洗脱支架植入术的疗效比较
Am J Cardiol. 2017 Aug 1;120(3):380-386. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.04.038. Epub 2017 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Revascularization strategies in Non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction: the clash continues.非ST段抬高型心肌梗死的血运重建策略:争论仍在继续。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Aug 20;12:1614843. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1614843. eCollection 2025.
2
Complete Revascularization in NSTE-ACS and Multivessel Disease: Clinical Outcomes and Prognostic Implications.非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征合并多支血管病变的完全血运重建:临床结局及预后意义
Life (Basel). 2025 Aug 15;15(8):1299. doi: 10.3390/life15081299.
3
A riddle of culprit only vs multivessel or immediate vs staged revascularization in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome: A meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.依维莫司洗脱支架或旁路移植术治疗左主干冠状动脉疾病。
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 8;375(23):2223-2235. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1610227. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
2
Single-Staged Compared With Multi-Staged PCI in Multivessel NSTEMI Patients: The SMILE Trial.单阶段与多阶段 PCI 在多支血管非 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的比较:SMILE 试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016 Jan 26;67(3):264-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.10.082.
3
Risk stratification of patients undergoing medical therapy after coronary angiography.
非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者中仅罪犯血管与多支血管病变或即刻与分期血运重建之谜:一项荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2025 Mar 18;20(3):e0310695. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0310695. eCollection 2025.
4
Percutaneous coronary intervention coronary artery bypass in treatment of non-ST-segment elevation acute syndromes: a systematic review and meta-analysis study.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术治疗非ST段抬高急性综合征的系统评价和荟萃分析研究
Eur J Transl Myol. 2025 Mar 31;35(1). doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2024.12930. Epub 2024 Nov 28.
5
Updated Strategies in Non-Culprit Stenosis Management of Multivessel Coronary Disease-A Contemporary Review.多支血管病变非罪犯狭窄管理的更新策略:当代综述。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Feb 2;60(2):263. doi: 10.3390/medicina60020263.
6
Revascularization with Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Non-ST-elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: A Snapshot of Randomized Trials and Registries.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征冠状动脉旁路移植术血运重建:随机试验与注册研究概述
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2023 Jan 9;120(1):e20220248. doi: 10.36660/abc.20220248. eCollection 2023.
7
Systemic Vulnerability, as Expressed by I-CAM and MMP-9 at Presentation, Predicts One Year Outcomes in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction-Insights from the VIP Clinical Study.I-CAM和MMP-9在发病时所表达的全身易损性可预测急性心肌梗死患者的一年预后——来自VIP临床研究的见解
J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 31;10(15):3435. doi: 10.3390/jcm10153435.
8
Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) identifies functional relevance of non-culprit lesions in coronary angiographies of patients with acute myocardial infarction.定量血流分数比值(QFR)可识别急性心肌梗死患者冠状动脉造影中罪犯病变以外的功能性相关性。
Clin Res Cardiol. 2021 Oct;110(10):1659-1667. doi: 10.1007/s00392-021-01897-w. Epub 2021 Jul 12.
9
Management of multivessel coronary artery disease in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a complex path to precision medicine.非ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者多支冠状动脉疾病的管理:通往精准医学的复杂路径。
Ther Adv Chronic Dis. 2020 Jul 1;11:2040622320938527. doi: 10.1177/2040622320938527. eCollection 2020.
10
Safety and Efficacy of Embolic Protection Devices in Saphenous Vein Graft Interventions: A Propensity Score Analysis-Multicenter SVG PCI PROTECTA Study.隐静脉搭桥介入治疗中栓子保护装置的安全性和有效性:一项倾向评分分析 - 多中心SVG PCI PROTECTA研究
J Clin Med. 2020 Apr 22;9(4):1198. doi: 10.3390/jcm9041198.
冠状动脉造影术后接受药物治疗患者的风险分层。
Eur Heart J. 2016 Oct 21;37(40):3103-3110. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv674. Epub 2015 Dec 18.
4
Frequency, clinical and angiographic characteristics, and outcomes of high-risk non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes patients with left circumflex culprit lesions.左回旋支罪犯病变的高危非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者的发生率、临床及血管造影特征和预后
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Jan 15;203:708-13. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.11.036. Epub 2015 Nov 10.
5
A comparison of multivessel and culprit vessel percutaneous coronary intervention in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome patients with multivessel disease: a meta-analysis.多支血管病变非 ST 段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者行多支血管与罪犯血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较:一项荟萃分析。
EuroIntervention. 2015 Sep;11(5):525-32. doi: 10.4244/EIJV11I5A104.
6
2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation: Task Force for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients Presenting without Persistent ST-Segment Elevation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).2015年欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者管理指南:欧洲心脏病学会(ESC)非持续性ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征患者管理工作组
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jan 14;37(3):267-315. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv320. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
7
Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Compared With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Proximal Left Anterior Descending Artery Treatment in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: Analysis From the ACUITY Trial.急性冠状动脉综合征患者近端左前降支动脉治疗中冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的比较:来自ACUITY试验的分析
J Invasive Cardiol. 2015 Oct;27(10):468-73. Epub 2015 Jun 15.
8
Surgical versus percutaneous coronary revascularization for multivessel disease in diabetic patients with non-ST-segment-elevation acute coronary syndrome: analysis from the Acute Catheterization and Early Intervention Triage Strategy trial.糖尿病合并非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征多支血管病变患者的外科手术与经皮冠状动脉血运重建治疗:来自急性导管插入术和早期干预分诊策略试验的分析
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Jun;8(6). doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.114.002032.
9
Meta-analysis of multivessel versus culprit-only percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome and multivessel coronary disease.非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征合并多支冠状动脉疾病患者多支血管与仅罪犯血管经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的荟萃分析
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Apr 15;115(8):1027-32. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.01.530. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
10
2014 AHA/ACC Guideline for the Management of Patients with Non-ST-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.2014年美国心脏协会/美国心脏病学会非ST段抬高型急性冠状动脉综合征患者管理指南:美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组报告
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Dec 23;64(24):e139-e228. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.09.017. Epub 2014 Sep 23.