Nash Meredith, Davies Amanda, Moore Robyn
School of Social Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
School of Built Environment, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
PLoS One. 2017 Oct 5;12(10):e0185727. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185727. eCollection 2017.
It is widely acknowledged that women in science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine (STEMM) fields are underrepresented in leadership globally. However, little is known about how leadership styles of women in STEMM relate to this underrepresentation. This article discusses findings from a survey examining how 61 women in STEMM define leadership and describe their own leadership styles. Using content analysis and drawing on Full Range Leadership Model factors, findings suggest that women define leadership and describe their own leadership styles using transformational factors. However, there was no consistency in how participants defined ideal leadership or how they defined their own leadership styles. This finding unsettles ideas of distinctly gendered leadership styles. We argue that expectations that leadership will be performed in distinctly gendered styles may be contributing to the underrepresentation of women in leadership roles in STEMM.
人们普遍认为,在科学、技术、工程、数学和医学(STEMM)领域,女性在全球领导层中的代表性不足。然而,对于STEMM领域女性的领导风格与这种代表性不足之间的关系,人们却知之甚少。本文讨论了一项调查的结果,该调查研究了61名STEMM领域的女性如何定义领导力以及描述她们自己的领导风格。通过内容分析并借鉴全范围领导模型因素,研究结果表明,女性使用变革型因素来定义领导力并描述她们自己的领导风格。然而,参与者对理想领导力的定义以及对自己领导风格的定义并不一致。这一发现动摇了关于明显具有性别特征的领导风格的观念。我们认为,认为领导力将以明显具有性别特征的方式来表现的期望,可能是导致女性在STEMM领域担任领导角色的代表性不足的原因之一。