Al-Mohtaseb Zaina, He Xu, Yesilirmak Nilufer, Waren Daniel, Donaldson Kendall E
J Refract Surg. 2017 Oct 1;33(10):708-712. doi: 10.3928/1081597X-20170731-01.
To analyze and compare the changes in endothelial cell density (ECD) and cumulative dissipated energy (CDE) in patients having cataract surgery with two different femtosecond laser platforms and standard phacoemulsification.
This prospective non-randomized comparative study included patients scheduled to undergo cataract extraction using femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) (60 eyes) or standard phacoemulsification (60 eyes) between September 2013 and March 2016. The main outcome measures were CDE and percentage of endothelial cell loss. Comparative analysis of CDE and percentage of endothelial cell loss between the two phacoemulsification platforms with respect to conventional and FLACS techniques was performed.
The CDE and the 1-month mean percentage of endothelial cell loss was 6.11 ± 3.52 and 9.06% ± 8.77% in the standard phacoemulsification group and 4.65 ± 3.61 and 6.00% ± 8.02% in the FLACS group, respectively (P = .039). In the subgroup analysis based on cataract grading, the CDE was significantly less in the FLACS group compared to the standard phacoemulsification group in both the early and advanced cataract group (P = .002). The percent decrease in endothelial cell loss was statistically lower in the FLACS group when compared to the standard phacoemulsification group in the advanced cataract subgroup (P = .02).
FLACS pretreatment resulted in a decrease in CDE and less endothelial cell loss when compared to standard phacoemulsification. The decrease in endothelial cell loss was more prominent in the denser cataract group; thus, FLACS may be most beneficial in those cases. There was no significant difference in results between the two laser platforms. [J Refract Surg. 2017;33(10):708-712.].
分析和比较使用两种不同飞秒激光平台及标准超声乳化术进行白内障手术的患者的内皮细胞密度(ECD)和累积耗散能量(CDE)的变化。
这项前瞻性非随机对照研究纳入了2013年9月至2016年3月期间计划接受飞秒激光辅助白内障手术(FLACS)(60只眼)或标准超声乳化术(60只眼)的白内障摘除患者。主要观察指标为CDE和内皮细胞丢失百分比。对两种超声乳化平台在传统技术和FLACS技术方面的CDE及内皮细胞丢失百分比进行了比较分析。
标准超声乳化组的CDE及1个月时内皮细胞丢失的平均百分比分别为6.11±3.52和9.06%±8.77%,FLACS组分别为4.65±3.61和6.00%±8.02%(P = 0.039)。在基于白内障分级的亚组分析中,早期和晚期白内障组中,FLACS组的CDE均显著低于标准超声乳化组(P = 0.002)。在晚期白内障亚组中,FLACS组内皮细胞丢失的减少百分比与标准超声乳化组相比有统计学意义(P = 0.02)。
与标准超声乳化术相比,FLACS预处理可降低CDE并减少内皮细胞丢失。内皮细胞丢失的减少在较致密的白内障组中更为显著;因此,FLACS在这些病例中可能最有益。两种激光平台的结果无显著差异。[《屈光手术杂志》。2017;33(10):708 - 712。]