Suppr超能文献

可避免的急诊科就诊:一个起点。

Avoidable emergency department visits: a starting point.

作者信息

Hsia Renee Y, Niedzwiecki Matthew

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, 1001 Potrero Ave, 1E21, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA.

Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California at San Francisco, 3333 California St, San Francisco, CA 94118, USA.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Oct 1;29(5):642-645. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx081.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To better characterize and understand the nature of a very conservative definition of 'avoidable' emergency department (ED) visits in the United States to provide policymakers insight into what interventions can target non-urgent ED visits.

DESIGN/SETTING: We performed a retrospective analysis of a very conservative definition of 'avoidable' ED visits using data from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey from 2005 to 2011.

PARTICIPANTS

We examined a total of 115 081 records, representing 424 million ED visits made by patients aged 18-64 years who were seen in the ED and discharged home.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We defined 'avoidable' as ED visits that did not require any diagnostic or screening services, procedures or medications, and were discharged home.

RESULTS

In total, 3.3% (95% CI: 3.0-3.7) of all ED visits were 'avoidable.' The top five chief complaints included toothache, back pain, headache, other symptoms/problems related to psychosis and throat soreness. Alcohol abuse, dental disorders and depressive disorders were among the top three ICD-9 discharge diagnoses. Alcohol-related disorders and mood disorders accounted for 6.8% (95% CI: 5.7-8.0) of avoidable visits, and dental disorders accounted for 3.9% (95% CI: 3.0-4.8) of CCS-grouped discharge diagnoses.

CONCLUSIONS

A significant number of 'avoidable' ED visits were for mental health and dental conditions, which the ED is not fully equipped to treat. Our findings provide a better understanding of what policy initiatives could potentially reduce these 'avoidable' ED visits to address the gaps in our healthcare system, such as increased access to mental health and dental care.

摘要

目的

为了更好地描述和理解美国对“可避免的”急诊科就诊的一种非常保守的定义的本质,从而为政策制定者提供关于哪些干预措施可以针对非紧急急诊科就诊的见解。

设计/背景:我们使用2005年至2011年美国国家医院门诊医疗调查的数据,对“可避免的”急诊科就诊的一种非常保守的定义进行了回顾性分析。

参与者

我们共检查了115081条记录,代表了年龄在18 - 64岁的患者在急诊科就诊并出院回家的4.24亿次急诊科就诊。

主要结局指标

我们将“可避免的”定义为不需要任何诊断或筛查服务、程序或药物治疗且出院回家的急诊科就诊。

结果

总体而言,所有急诊科就诊中有3.3%(95%置信区间:3.0 - 3.7)是“可避免的”。最常见的五大主诉包括牙痛、背痛、头痛、与精神病相关的其他症状/问题以及喉咙痛。酒精滥用、牙科疾病和抑郁症是国际疾病分类第九版(ICD - 9)出院诊断中排名前三的疾病。与酒精相关的疾病和情绪障碍占可避免就诊的6.8%(95%置信区间:5.7 - 8.0),牙科疾病占按临床分类软件(CCS)分组的出院诊断的3.9%(95%置信区间:3.0 - 4.8)。

结论

相当数量的“可避免的”急诊科就诊是由于心理健康和牙科疾病,而急诊科并未完全具备治疗这些疾病的能力。我们的研究结果有助于更好地理解哪些政策举措可能减少这些“可避免的”急诊科就诊,以弥补我们医疗保健系统中的差距,例如增加获得心理健康和牙科护理的机会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验