• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

急诊科胸痛患者主要不良心脏事件的早期排除:一项前瞻性观察研究。

Early Exclusion of Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Emergency Department Chest Pain Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.

作者信息

Leung Yuk-Ki, Cheng Nga-Man, Chan Cangel Pui-Yee, Lee Anna, Wong Jeffrey Ka-Tak, Yan Bryan Ping-Yen, Ahuja Anil Tejbhan, Graham Colin Alexander, Rainer Timothy Hudson

机构信息

Accident and Emergency Medicine Academic Unit, Main Clinical Block and Trauma Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong.

Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

出版信息

J Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;53(3):287-294. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.05.006.

DOI:10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.05.006
PMID:28992867
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The current evaluation of patients with chest pain presenting to an emergency department (ED) with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a lengthy process involving serial measurements of troponin.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to validate the diagnostic accuracy of a Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score with single high-sensitive cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) for early rule out of 30-day major adverse cardiac events (MACE), and to compare the TIMI score with combinations of heart-type fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP) and a modified HEART (history, electrocardiogram, age, risk factors, troponin) score.

METHODS

We recruited 602 consecutive adult patients with chest pain and suspected ACS in the ED. Each patient had TIMI and HEART scores, and a point-of-care H-FABP test.

RESULTS

MACE occurred in 42 (7.0%) patients within 30 days. A low risk for 30-day MACE was identified by a modified TIMI score of 0 in 65 (11%) patients, and by a HEART score ≤ 2 in 96 (16%) patients. No MACE occurred in these groups, giving both scores a sensitivity of 100% (95% confidence interval [CI] 91.6-100%), and specificity of 11.6% (95% CI 9.2-14.5%) and 17.1% (95% CI 14.2-20.5%), respectively. Use of combined TIMI and HEART scores improved the specificity further to 22.0% (95% CI 18.7-25.6%) without lowering sensitivity. Early H-FABP measurement > 7 μg/L had a sensitivity of 41.5% (95% CI 27.8-56.6%) and a specificity of 91.1% (95% CI 88.4-93.2%) for predicting 30-day MACE.

CONCLUSIONS

A modified TIMI score of 0 or a HEART score of ≤ 2, incorporating a single hs-cTnT level, will identify patients with low risk of 30-day MACE for early discharge within 2 h of ED arrival.

摘要

背景

目前对因疑似急性冠脉综合征(ACS)而到急诊科(ED)就诊的胸痛患者的评估是一个漫长的过程,包括对肌钙蛋白的系列检测。

目的

我们旨在验证心肌梗死溶栓(TIMI)评分结合单次高敏心肌肌钙蛋白T(hs-cTnT)对30天主要不良心脏事件(MACE)早期排除的诊断准确性,并将TIMI评分与心脏型脂肪酸结合蛋白(H-FABP)及改良的HEART(病史、心电图、年龄、危险因素、肌钙蛋白)评分组合进行比较。

方法

我们招募了602例连续的因胸痛且疑似ACS而到急诊科就诊的成年患者。每位患者均有TIMI和HEART评分,并进行了即时H-FABP检测。

结果

42例(7.0%)患者在30天内发生了MACE。改良TIMI评分为0的65例(11%)患者及HEART评分≤2的96例(16%)患者被确定为30天MACE低风险。这些组中均未发生MACE,两种评分的敏感性均为100%(95%置信区间[CI] 91.6 - 100%),特异性分别为11.6%(95% CI 9.2 - 14.5%)和17.1%(95% CI 14.2 - 20.5%)。联合使用TIMI和HEART评分可将特异性进一步提高至22.0%(95% CI 18.7 - 25.6%)而不降低敏感性。早期H-FABP检测>7μg/L对预测30天MACE的敏感性为41.5%(95% CI 27.8 - 56.6%),特异性为91.1%(95% CI 88.4 - 93.2%)。

结论

改良TIMI评分为0或HEART评分≤2(纳入单次hs-cTnT水平)可识别出30天MACE低风险患者,以便在到达急诊科后2小时内早期出院。

相似文献

1
Early Exclusion of Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Emergency Department Chest Pain Patients: A Prospective Observational Study.急诊科胸痛患者主要不良心脏事件的早期排除:一项前瞻性观察研究。
J Emerg Med. 2017 Sep;53(3):287-294. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2017.05.006.
2
Validation of high-sensitivity troponin I in a 2-hour diagnostic strategy to assess 30-day outcomes in emergency department patients with possible acute coronary syndrome.高敏肌钙蛋白 I 在 2 小时诊断策略中的验证,以评估急诊科疑似急性冠状动脉综合征患者 30 天结局。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Oct 1;62(14):1242-1249. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.02.078. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
3
Add-on tests for improving risk-stratification in emergency department patients with chest pain who are at low to moderate risk of 30-day major adverse cardiac events.用于改善急诊科胸痛患者风险分层的附加检测,这些患者30天内发生重大不良心脏事件的风险为低到中度。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Oct 1;220:299-306. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.05.057. Epub 2016 May 14.
4
Prehospital Modified HEART Score Predictive of 30-Day Adverse Cardiac Events.院前改良HEART评分对30天不良心脏事件的预测作用
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018 Feb;33(1):58-62. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X17007154. Epub 2018 Jan 10.
5
Prospective validation of a modified thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk score in emergency department patients with chest pain and possible acute coronary syndrome.前瞻性验证改良的心肌梗死溶栓治疗风险评分在急诊科胸痛且可能为急性冠脉综合征患者中的应用。
Acad Emerg Med. 2010 Apr;17(4):368-75. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2010.00696.x.
6
2-Hour accelerated diagnostic protocol to assess patients with chest pain symptoms using contemporary troponins as the only biomarker: the ADAPT trial.2 小时加速诊断方案,使用当代肌钙蛋白作为唯一生物标志物评估胸痛症状患者:ADAPT 试验。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Jun 5;59(23):2091-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.035. Epub 2012 May 9.
7
External validation of heart-type fatty acid binding protein, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin, and electrocardiography as rule-out for acute myocardial infarction.心脏型脂肪酸结合蛋白、高敏心肌肌钙蛋白及心电图用于急性心肌梗死排除诊断的外部验证
Clin Biochem. 2018 Feb;52:161-163. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2017.10.001. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
8
Risk stratifying chest pain patients in the emergency department using HEART, GRACE and TIMI scores, with a single contemporary troponin result, to predict major adverse cardiac events.使用 HEART、GRACE 和 TIMI 评分以及单次当代肌钙蛋白结果对急诊科胸痛患者进行风险分层,以预测主要不良心脏事件。
Emerg Med J. 2018 Jul;35(7):420-427. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2017-207172. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
9
Identifying Patients Suitable for Discharge After a Single-Presentation High-Sensitivity Troponin Result: A Comparison of Five Established Risk Scores and Two High-Sensitivity Assays.根据单次检测的高敏肌钙蛋白结果识别适合出院的患者:五种既定风险评分与两种高敏检测方法的比较
Ann Emerg Med. 2015 Dec;66(6):635-645.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.07.006. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
10
Comparison of four decision aids for the early diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes in the emergency department.比较四种决策辅助工具在急诊科急性冠状动脉综合征早期诊断中的应用。
Emerg Med J. 2020 Jan;37(1):8-13. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2019-208898. Epub 2019 Nov 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of HEAR and HEART Scores for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events.主要不良心血管事件的HEAR评分与HEART评分比较
Cureus. 2023 Oct 9;15(10):e46721. doi: 10.7759/cureus.46721. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
Risk Stratification of Acute-Onset Chest Pain: SVEAT Score Versus HEART and TIMI Scores.急性胸痛的风险分层:SVEAT评分与HEART及TIMI评分的比较
Cureus. 2023 May 28;15(5):e39590. doi: 10.7759/cureus.39590. eCollection 2023 May.
3
Indirect comparison of TIMI, HEART and GRACE for predicting major cardiovascular events in patients admitted to the emergency department with acute chest pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
系统评价和荟萃分析:比较 TIMI、HEART 和 GRACE 评分预测急诊科因急性胸痛入院的患者发生主要心血管事件的能力。
BMJ Open. 2021 Aug 18;11(8):e048356. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048356.
4
The HEART score in predicting major adverse cardiac events in patients presenting to the emergency department with possible acute coronary syndrome: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.HEART 评分在预测急诊科疑似急性冠脉综合征患者中主要不良心脏事件的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 2;7(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0816-4.