Maurer Tilman, Metzner Andreas, Ho S Yen, Wohlmuth Peter, Reißmann Bruno, Heeger Christian, Lemes Christine, Hayashi Kentaro, Saguner Ardan M, Riedl Johannes, Sohns Christian, Mathew Shibu, Kuck Karl-Heinz, Wissner Erik, Ouyang Feifan
From the Department of Cardiology, Asklepios-Klinik St Georg, Hamburg, Germany (T.M., A.M., B.R., C.H., C.L., K.H., A.M.S., J.R., C.S., S.M., K.-H.K., F.O.); Royal Brompton Hospital and Harefield NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom (S.Y.H.); Asklepios Proresearch, Hamburg, Germany (P.W.); and Division of Cardiology, University of Illinois at Chicago (E.W.).
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2017 Oct;10(10). doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.117.005191.
The mitral isthmus is a critical part of perimitral reentrant tachycardia, as well as an important substrate of persistent atrial fibrillation. Deployment of an endocardial mitral isthmus line (MIL) with the end point of bidirectional block may be challenging and often requires additional epicardial ablation within the coronary sinus.
The study population comprised 114 patients with perimitral flutter who underwent de novo ablation of an MIL. The initial 57 patients (group A) underwent catheter ablation using a novel superolateral MIL design, connecting the left-sided pulmonary veins with the mitral annulus along the posterior base of the left atrial appendage visualized by selective angiography. The next 57 patients (group B) served as a control group and underwent ablation using a conventional MIL design, connecting the left inferior pulmonary vein with the mitral annulus. Bidirectional block was achieved in 56 of 57 patients in group A (98.2%) and 50 of 57 patients in group B (87.7%; =0.06). Deployment of a superolateral MIL required significantly less ablation from within the coronary sinus (7.0% versus 71.9%; <0.01). Predictors for unsuccessful bidirectional mitral isthmus blockade were the need for epicardial ablation from within the coronary sinus (<0.01) and the total length of the MIL (29.3±6.35 mm versus 40.8±7.29 mm; =0.005). A higher rate of pericardial tamponade was observed in group A (5.2% versus 0%; =0.24).
The superolateral MIL is associated with a high acute success rate to achieve bidirectional block using endocardial ablation only with minimal need for epicardial ablation from within the coronary sinus.
二尖瓣峡部是二尖瓣环折返性心动过速的关键部位,也是持续性心房颤动的重要基质。部署以双向阻滞为终点的心内膜二尖瓣峡部线(MIL)可能具有挑战性,且通常需要在冠状窦内进行额外的心外膜消融。
研究人群包括114例接受二尖瓣峡部首次消融的二尖瓣环扑动患者。最初的57例患者(A组)采用新型超外侧MIL设计进行导管消融,通过选择性血管造影显示,沿着左心耳后基底将左侧肺静脉与二尖瓣环相连。接下来的57例患者(B组)作为对照组,采用传统的MIL设计进行消融,将左下肺静脉与二尖瓣环相连。A组57例患者中有56例(98.2%)实现了双向阻滞,B组57例患者中有50例(87.7%)实现了双向阻滞(P=0.06)。部署超外侧MIL时,冠状窦内所需的消融明显更少(7.0%对71.9%;P<0.01)。二尖瓣峡部双向阻滞未成功的预测因素是需要在冠状窦内进行心外膜消融(P<0.01)以及MIL的总长度(29.3±6.35mm对40.8±7.29mm;P=0.005)。A组心包填塞的发生率更高(5.2%对0%;P=0.24)。
超外侧MIL仅通过心内膜消融实现双向阻滞的急性成功率高,且在冠状窦内进行心外膜消融的需求最小。