Suppr超能文献

多中心评估中央肿瘤位置对接受电视辅助手术与开放性手术的临床Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌患者 N1 升期率的影响†。

Multicentric evaluation of the impact of central tumour location when comparing rates of N1 upstaging in patients undergoing video-assisted and open surgery for clinical Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer†.

机构信息

Department of Thoracic Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.

Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2018 Feb 1;53(2):359-365. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezx338.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Large retrospective series have indicated lower rates of cN0 to pN1 nodal upstaging after video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) compared with open resections for Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The objective of our multicentre study was to investigate whether the presumed lower rate of N1 upstaging after VATS disappears after correction for central tumour location in a multivariable analysis.

METHODS

Consecutive patients operated for PET-CT based clinical Stage I NSCLC were selected from prospectively managed surgical databases in 11 European centres. Central tumour location was defined as contact with bronchovascular structures on computer tomography and/or visibility on standard bronchoscopy.

RESULTS

Eight hundred and ninety-five patients underwent pulmonary resection by VATS (n = 699, 9% conversions) or an open technique (n = 196) in 2014. Incidence of nodal pN1 and pN2 upstaging was 8% and 7% after VATS and 15% and 6% after open surgery, respectively. pN1 was found in 27% of patients with central tumours. Less central tumours were operated on by VATS compared with the open technique (12% vs 28%, P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis showed that only tumour location had a significant impact on N1 upstaging (OR 6.2, confidence interval 3.6-10.8; P < 0.001) and that the effect of surgical technique (VATS versus open surgery) was no longer significant when accounting for tumour location.

CONCLUSIONS

A quarter of patients with central clinical Stage I NSCLC was upstaged to pN1 at resection. Central tumour location was the only independent factor associated with N1 upstaging, undermining the evidence for lower N1 upstaging after VATS resections. Studies investigating N1 upstaging after VATS compared with open surgery should be interpreted with caution due to possible selection bias, i.e. relatively more central tumours in the open group with a higher chance of N1 upstaging.

摘要

目的

大型回顾性研究表明,与开胸手术(VATS)相比,Ⅰ期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者接受 VATS 后 cN0 至 pN1 淋巴结升级的比率较低。本多中心研究的目的是在多变量分析中,通过校正肿瘤中心位置,探讨 VATS 后假定的 N1 升级率是否消失。

方法

从 11 个欧洲中心的前瞻性管理手术数据库中选择连续接受 PET-CT 基于临床Ⅰ期 NSCLC 手术的患者。中央肿瘤位置定义为计算机断层扫描上与支气管血管结构接触和/或标准支气管镜下可见。

结果

2014 年,895 例患者接受 VATS(n=699,9%转为开胸手术)或开胸手术(n=196)切除。VATS 和开胸手术后淋巴结 pN1 和 pN2 升级的发生率分别为 8%和 7%,15%和 6%。27%的中央肿瘤患者发现 pN1。与开胸手术相比,VATS 手术中肿瘤位置越偏中心的患者比例较低(12%对 28%,P<0.001)。Logistic 回归分析显示,只有肿瘤位置对 N1 升级有显著影响(OR 6.2,置信区间 3.6-10.8;P<0.001),当考虑肿瘤位置时,手术技术(VATS 与开胸手术)的影响不再显著。

结论

四分之一的中央临床Ⅰ期 NSCLC 患者在切除时升级为 pN1。中央肿瘤位置是唯一与 N1 升级相关的独立因素,这削弱了 VATS 切除后 N1 升级率较低的证据。由于可能存在选择偏倚,即开胸组中相对更多的中央肿瘤有更高的 N1 升级机会,因此对 VATS 与开胸手术相比 N1 升级的研究应谨慎解读。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验