Department of Neurology, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), Houston, TX, USA.
Mult Scler. 2017 Oct;23(12):1636-1641. doi: 10.1177/1352458517729458.
The last several decades have witnessed considerable progress in our understanding of the pathogenesis, refining diagnostic criteria, and identifying therapies of value for modifying the course of relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. While the pace of progress has lagged for those with progressive phase disease, this now seems to be changing. This review considers those characteristics of patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis that may contribute to phase 3 trial success and identifies some of the thorny issues that remain ahead. The larger of the studies conducted thus far have sequentially informed our understanding of "pure" primary progressive disease, and also challenge both phase 3 and especially phase 2 trial designs and participant selection for investigations going forward. This may have particular relevance for testing therapeutics directed at neuroprotection and repair in the face of ongoing progression regardless of trial participant categorization using current conventional disease phenotypes.
过去几十年见证了我们对复发性多发性硬化症发病机制的认识、细化诊断标准以及发现有价值的治疗方法以改变疾病进程方面的重大进展。虽然进展的步伐在进展期疾病患者中滞后,但这种情况现在似乎正在改变。这篇综述考虑了原发性进展型多发性硬化症患者的一些特征,这些特征可能有助于 3 期试验的成功,并确定了一些仍然存在的棘手问题。迄今为止进行的较大型研究逐步告知了我们对“纯”原发性进展性疾病的理解,也对 3 期试验以及特别是 2 期试验设计以及未来研究的参与者选择提出了挑战。这在面对无论使用当前常规疾病表型如何对试验参与者进行分类,仍持续进展的情况下,针对神经保护和修复的治疗测试可能具有特殊意义。