文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

继续教育背景下电子学习对护理的影响:系统定性、定量及混合研究综述(方案)

Effects of e-learning in a continuing education context on nursing care: a review of systematic qualitative, quantitative and mixed studies reviews (protocol).

作者信息

Rouleau Geneviève, Gagnon Marie-Pierre, Côté José, Payne-Gagnon Julie, Hudson Emilie, Bouix-Picasso Julien, Dubois Carl-Ardy

机构信息

Faculty of Nursing Sciences, Université Laval, Quebec, Canada.

Research Chair in Innovative Nursing Practices, University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2017 Oct 16;7(10):e018441. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018441.


DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018441
PMID:29042394
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5652594/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Continuing education (CE) is imperative to the future of professional nursing. The use of e-learning by registered nurses for CE is spreading. A review of systematic reviews will be conducted to develop a broad picture of the effects of e-learning in a CE context on nursing care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Systematic qualitative, quantitative and mixed studies reviews published in English, French or Spanish from 1 January 2006 will be included. The outcomes of interest will be extracted and analysed inductively and deductively from the Nursing Care Performance Framework; some themes include nursing resources, nurses' practice environment, processes, professional satisfaction, and nursing sensitive outcomes. Three reviewers will independently screen first the title and abstract of the papers, and then the full texts in order to assess eligibility. Two teams of two reviewers will extract the selected reviews' characteristics and data. The results from various types of reviews will be integrated using a data-based convergent synthesis design. We will conduct a thematic synthesis and transform all quantitative and mixed data into qualitative data. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for review of systematic reviews. We will summarise evidence concerning the negative, neutral and positive effects of various forms of e-learning on different aspects of nursing care. If we find gaps in the literature, we will highlight them and suggest ideas for further research. We will also focus on positive effects and present, if possible, the components and characteristics of e-learning interventions that were found to be successful. We will present this protocol and results in international conferences in nursing, medical, and health informatics domains. We will also submit the results of our work for peer-review publication in a journal indexed in the international bibliographic database of biomedical information.

摘要

引言:继续教育对专业护理的未来至关重要。注册护士将电子学习用于继续教育的情况正在不断增加。我们将对系统评价进行综述,以全面了解在继续教育背景下电子学习对护理的影响。 方法与分析:纳入2006年1月1日以来以英文、法文或西班牙文发表的系统定性、定量和混合研究综述。将从护理绩效框架中归纳和演绎提取并分析感兴趣的结果;一些主题包括护理资源、护士的执业环境、流程、职业满意度和护理敏感结果。三位评审员将首先独立筛选论文的标题和摘要,然后筛选全文以评估其是否符合要求。两组评审员,每组两人,将提取所选综述的特征和数据。将使用基于数据的收敛性综合设计整合各类综述的结果。我们将进行主题综合,并将所有定量和混合数据转化为定性数据。 伦理与传播:对系统评价进行综述无需伦理批准。我们将总结关于各种形式的电子学习对护理不同方面的负面、中性和正面影响的证据。如果我们发现文献中的空白,将予以突出并提出进一步研究的思路。我们还将关注积极影响,并尽可能展示已被证明成功的电子学习干预措施的组成部分和特征。我们将在护理、医学和健康信息学领域的国际会议上介绍本方案和结果。我们还将提交我们的工作结果,以供在生物医学信息国际文献数据库索引的期刊上进行同行评审发表。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a13b/5652594/6923e5aaad64/bmjopen-2017-018441f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a13b/5652594/6923e5aaad64/bmjopen-2017-018441f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a13b/5652594/6923e5aaad64/bmjopen-2017-018441f01.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Effects of e-learning in a continuing education context on nursing care: a review of systematic qualitative, quantitative and mixed studies reviews (protocol).

BMJ Open. 2017-10-16

[2]
Effects of E-Learning in a Continuing Education Context on Nursing Care: Systematic Review of Systematic Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed-Studies Reviews.

J Med Internet Res. 2019-10-2

[3]
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-2-1

[4]
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.

Med J Aust. 2020-12

[5]
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.

JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015-1

[6]
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.

JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015-1

[7]
Experiences of registered nurses as managers and leaders in residential aged care facilities: a systematic review.

Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2011-12

[8]
Effects of e-Learning and m-Learning on Nursing Care in a Continuing Education Context: An Overview of Mixed Method Systematic Reviews (Protocol).

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017

[9]
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.

JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009

[10]
Impacts of information and communication technologies on nursing care: an overview of systematic reviews (protocol).

Syst Rev. 2015-5-23

引用本文的文献

[1]
Effectiveness of eLearning programme for capacity building of healthcare professionals: a systematic review.

Hum Resour Health. 2024-9-2

[2]
Continuous training based on the needs of operating room nurses using web application: a new approach to improve their knowledge.

BMC Med Educ. 2024-3-26

[3]
Evaluation of E-Learning Experience among Health and Allied Health Professions Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Slovenia: An Instrument Development and Validation Study.

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022-4-14

[4]
The characteristics of effective technology-enabled dementia education: a systematic review and mixed research synthesis.

Syst Rev. 2022-2-23

[5]
Triage Training in Iran from 2010 to 2020: A Systematic Review on Educational Intervention Studies.

Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2021-5-17

[6]
The characteristics of effective technology-enabled dementia education for health and social care practitioners: protocol for a mixed studies systematic review.

Syst Rev. 2019-12-6

[7]
Effects of E-Learning in a Continuing Education Context on Nursing Care: Systematic Review of Systematic Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed-Studies Reviews.

J Med Internet Res. 2019-10-2

[8]
Synthesising evidence on patient portals: a protocol for an umbrella review.

BMJ Open. 2019-3-30

本文引用的文献

[1]
Impact of Information and Communication Technologies on Nursing Care: Results of an Overview of Systematic Reviews.

J Med Internet Res. 2017-4-25

[2]
Effect of using cardiovascular risk scoring in routine risk assessment in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease: protocol for an overview of systematic reviews.

BMJ Open. 2017-3-8

[3]
What guidance is available for researchers conducting overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions? A scoping review and qualitative metasummary.

Syst Rev. 2016-11-14

[4]
Opening-up the definition of systematic literature review: the plurality of worldviews, methodologies and methods for reviews and syntheses.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2016-5

[5]
Evidence map of studies evaluating methods for conducting, interpreting and reporting overviews of systematic reviews of interventions: rationale and design.

Syst Rev. 2016-1-6

[6]
Using qualitative evidence in decision making for health and social interventions: an approach to assess confidence in findings from qualitative evidence syntheses (GRADE-CERQual).

PLoS Med. 2015-10-27

[7]
Summarizing systematic reviews: methodological development, conduct and reporting of an umbrella review approach.

Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015-9

[8]
Quality assessment of qualitative evidence for systematic review and synthesis: Is it meaningful, and if so, how should it be performed?

Res Synth Methods. 2014-10-2

[9]
ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed.

J Clin Epidemiol. 2016-1

[10]
The facilitators and barriers to nurses' participation in continuing education programs: a mixed method explanatory sequential study.

Glob J Health Sci. 2014-11-30

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索