Arnal Jean-Michel, Garnero Aude, Saoli Mathieu, Chatburn Robert L
Service de Réanimation Polyvalente, Hôpital Sainte Musse, Toulon, France.
Department of Medical Research, Hamilton Medical, Bonaduz, Switzerland.
Respir Care. 2018 Feb;63(2):158-168. doi: 10.4187/respcare.05775. Epub 2017 Oct 17.
Simulation studies are often used to examine ventilator performance. However, there are no standards for selecting simulation parameters. This study collected data in passively-ventilated adult human subjects and summarized the results as a set of parameters that can be used for simulation studies of intubated, passive, adult subjects with normal lungs, COPD, or ARDS.
Consecutive adult patients admitted to the ICU were included if they were deeply sedated and mechanically ventilated for <48 h without any spontaneous breathing activity. Subjects were classified as having normal lungs, COPD, or ARDS. Respiratory mechanics variables were collected once per subject. Static compliance was calculated as the ratio between tidal volume and driving pressure. Inspiratory resistance was measured by the least-squares fitting method. The expiratory time constant was estimated by the tidal volume/flow ratio.
Of the 359 subjects included, 138 were classified as having normal lungs, 181 as ARDS, and 40 as COPD. Median (interquartile range) static compliance was significantly lower in ARDS subjects as compared with normal lung and COPD subjects (39 [32-50] mL/cm HO vs 54 [44-64] and 59 [43-75] mL/cm HO, respectively, < .001). Inspiratory resistance was significantly higher in COPD subjects as compared with normal lung and ARDS subjects (22 [16-33] cm HO/L/s vs 13 [10-15] and 12 [9-14] cm HO/L/s, respectively, < .001). The expiratory time constant was significantly different for each lung condition (0.60 [0.51-0.71], 1.07 [0.68-2.14], and 0.46 [0.40-0.55] s for normal lung, COPD, and ARDS subjects, respectively, < .001). In the subgroup of subjects with ARDS, there were no significant differences in respiratory mechanics variables among mild, moderate, and severe ARDS.
This study provides educators, researchers, and manufacturers with a standard set of practical parameters for simulating the respiratory system's mechanical properties in passive conditions.
模拟研究常用于检查呼吸机性能。然而,选择模拟参数尚无标准。本研究收集了被动通气成年受试者的数据,并将结果总结为一组参数,可用于对具有正常肺、慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)或急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)的插管成年被动受试者进行模拟研究。
纳入入住重症监护病房(ICU)的连续成年患者,这些患者需深度镇静且机械通气时间<48小时,无任何自主呼吸活动。受试者分为具有正常肺、COPD或ARDS。每位受试者收集一次呼吸力学变量。静态顺应性计算为潮气量与驱动压力之比。吸气阻力通过最小二乘法拟合测量。呼气时间常数通过潮气量/流量比估算。
纳入的359名受试者中,138名被分类为具有正常肺,181名患有ARDS,40名患有COPD。与正常肺和COPD受试者相比,ARDS受试者的中位(四分位间距)静态顺应性显著降低(分别为39[32 - 50]mL/cm H₂O vs 54[44 - 64]和59[43 - 75]mL/cm H₂O,P <.001)。与正常肺和ARDS受试者相比,COPD受试者的吸气阻力显著更高(分别为22[16 - 33]cm H₂O/L/s vs 13[10 - 15]和12[9 - 14]cm H₂O/L/s,P <.001)。每种肺部情况的呼气时间常数显著不同(正常肺、COPD和ARDS受试者分别为0.60[0.51 - 0.71]、1.07[0.68 - 2.14]和0.46[0.40 - 0.55]秒,P <.001)。在ARDS受试者亚组中,轻度、中度和重度ARDS之间的呼吸力学变量无显著差异。
本研究为教育工作者、研究人员和制造商提供了一组标准的实用参数,用于在被动条件下模拟呼吸系统的机械特性。