Kandiah David Arumaisingam
Division of Psychiatry, Medical School, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017 Oct 3;8:683-689. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S146175. eCollection 2017.
The development of clinical reasoning and decision-making skills is often limited in medical school curricula. In reality, medical graduates acquire these skills during their first few years of residency. For many, this can be stressful as they may be working under limited supervision as a part of their rotations.
Student-led Grand Rounds was developed to transfer both explicit and tacit knowledge to final year medical students. This pilot project was to apply the principles of knowledge management to allow students to be exposed to the reasoning and decision making of common clinical presentations. Student feedback through questionnaires was collated at the end of the program.
Based on feedback and focus groups, modifications were made to produce a stable program in subsequent clinical rotations. Formal feedback was collated from all the 76 students who participated in the first year. This represented 100% of the cohort for this clinical school for that year. There was a 100% response rate as the feedback forms were given and collected at the end of the last session per block. The student responses were both in ratings defined in a feedback forms and in written comments. A total of 74 of the 76 students rated the program highly. They enjoyed the nonthreatening interactions. The remaining two students preferred more didactic teaching.
This initiative allows an efficient transfer and utilization of knowledge. This could maximize the acquisition of practical knowledge by medical students as they finish their course in the transition to graduate medical practice.
临床推理和决策技能的培养在医学院课程中往往受到限制。实际上,医学毕业生是在住院医师培训的头几年获得这些技能的。对许多人来说,这可能会有压力,因为他们在轮科期间可能在有限的监督下工作。
开展了以学生为主导的大查房,将显性知识和隐性知识传授给医学专业最后一年的学生。这个试点项目旨在应用知识管理原则,让学生接触常见临床症状的推理和决策过程。在项目结束时整理了通过问卷调查收集的学生反馈。
根据反馈和焦点小组的意见进行了修改,以便在随后的临床轮科中形成一个稳定的项目。收集了参与第一年项目的所有76名学生的正式反馈。这代表了该临床学院当年该班级的100%。由于反馈表在每个模块的最后一次课程结束时发放并收集,因此回复率为100%。学生的回复既有反馈表中规定的评分,也有书面评论。76名学生中有74名对该项目评价很高。他们喜欢这种没有威胁感的互动。其余两名学生更喜欢更具说教性的教学方式。
这项举措能够有效地进行知识的传递和利用。这可以使医学生在完成课程并向毕业后医疗实践过渡的过程中最大限度地获取实践知识。