Hostiuc Sorin, Negoi Ionuț, Rusu Mugurel C, Hostiuc Mihaela
Department of Legal Medicine and Bioethics, Faculty of Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania, 042122.
J Forensic Sci. 2018 Jul;63(4):1176-1185. doi: 10.1111/1556-4029.13665. Epub 2017 Oct 16.
The main objective of this article was to analyze prevalence data about myocardial bridging (MB) in published studies. To this purpose, we performed a meta-analysis of studies published in English literature that contained data about the prevalence of MB and its anatomical characteristics. The overall prevalence was 19% (CI: 17-21%); autopsy studies revealed an overall prevalence of 42% (CI: 30-55%), CT studies 22% (CI: 18-25%), and coronary angiography 6% (CI: 5-8%). Most bridges were located on the left anterior descending artery (82% overall, 63% on autopsy studies), had a mean thickness of 2.47 mm and a mean length of 19.3 mm. In conclusion, autopsy studies should be the gold standard in evaluating the actual prevalence of myocardial bridges, while in vivo high-resolution CT scanning should be preferred to coronary angiography studies.
本文的主要目的是分析已发表研究中关于心肌桥(MB)的患病率数据。为此,我们对英文文献中发表的包含MB患病率及其解剖特征数据的研究进行了荟萃分析。总体患病率为19%(CI:17 - 21%);尸检研究显示总体患病率为42%(CI:30 - 55%),CT研究为22%(CI:18 - 25%),冠状动脉造影为6%(CI:5 - 8%)。大多数心肌桥位于左前降支动脉(总体为82%,尸检研究中为63%),平均厚度为2.47毫米,平均长度为19.3毫米。总之,尸检研究应是评估心肌桥实际患病率的金标准,而在活体中,高分辨率CT扫描应优先于冠状动脉造影研究。