Suppr超能文献

经皮冠状动脉介入治疗冠状动脉钙化时的轨道旋磨术和 rotational atherectomy(此处 rotational atherectomy 可能是特定的医学术语,暂未找到完全对应的准确中文,可保留英文或根据具体语境进一步确定合适译法,比如“旋切术”等)

Orbital and rotational atherectomy during percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary artery calcification.

作者信息

Lee Michael S, Gordin Jonathan S, Stone Gregg W, Sharma Samin K, Saito Shigeru, Mahmud Ehtisham, Chambers Jeff, Généreux Philippe, Shlofmitz Richard

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California.

Columbia University Medical Center/New York-Presbyterian Hospital and the Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York, New York.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Jul;92(1):61-67. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27339. Epub 2017 Oct 17.

Abstract

Severe coronary artery calcification (CAC) increases the complexity of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) by inhibiting optimal stent expansion, leading to an increased risk of death, myocardial infarction, repeat revascularization, and stent thrombosis. Coronary atherectomy modifies and debulks calcified plaque to facilitate PCI. Although there is no clear consensus, and further studies are needed, the decision to perform atherectomy should be based upon the presence of fluoroscopic CAC or with the use of intravascular imaging. The management of CAC in the modern era relies on rotational and orbital atherectomy to prepare the lesion to facilitate stent delivery and optimal expansion. While the two technologies differ in equipment, technique, and mechanism of action, the available literature suggests similar efficacy and safety of the two systems, although head-to-head comparisons are limited. While rotational and orbital atherectomy have been shown to have excellent procedural success in terms of facilitating stent delivery, no system has been shown to reduce long-term major adverse cardiovascular events, although the definitive trial for orbital atherectomy has not been completed. Additional trials are needed to find the population who would derive the most benefit of atherectomy and to compare the two systems in a prospective manner.

摘要

严重冠状动脉钙化(CAC)会抑制支架的最佳扩张,从而增加经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的复杂性,导致死亡、心肌梗死、再次血管重建和支架血栓形成的风险增加。冠状动脉旋切术可改变钙化斑块并减少其体积,以促进PCI。尽管目前尚无明确共识,且仍需进一步研究,但旋切术的决策应基于透视下观察到的CAC情况或使用血管内成像。现代冠状动脉钙化的处理依赖于旋磨术和轨道旋切术,以预处理病变,便于支架置入和最佳扩张。虽然这两种技术在设备、技术和作用机制上有所不同,但现有文献表明,尽管直接比较有限,但这两种系统的疗效和安全性相似。虽然旋磨术和轨道旋切术在促进支架置入方面已显示出优异的手术成功率,但尚无系统显示可减少长期主要不良心血管事件,尽管轨道旋切术的确定性试验尚未完成。需要进行更多试验,以确定最能从旋切术中获益的人群,并以前瞻性方式比较这两种系统。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验