Lee Seung Kyu, Kim Sang In, Lee Jungil, Chang Insu, Kim Jang-Lyul, Kim Hyoungtaek, Kim Min Chae, Kim Bong-Hwan
Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute, Daedeok-daero, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Arim Science, 205 Park Palace, Techno, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2018 Aug 1;180(1-4):46-50. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncx219.
When neutron survey metres are calibrated in neutron fields, the results for room- and air-scattered neutrons vary according to the distance from the source and the size, shape and construction of the neutron calibration room. ISO 8529-2 recommends four approaches for correcting these effects: the shadow-cone method, semi-empirical method, generalised fit method and reduced-fitting method. In this study, neutron scattering effects are evaluated and compared using the shadow-cone and semi-empirical methods for the neutron field of the Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI). The neutron field is constructed using a 252Cf neutron source positioned in the centre of the neutron calibration room. To compare the neutron scattering effects using the two correction methods, measurements and simulations are performed using respectively KAERI's Bonner sphere spectrometer (BBS) and Monte Carlo N-Particle code at twenty different positions. Neutron spectra are measured by a europium-activated lithium iodide [6LiI(Eu)] scintillator in combination with the BBS. The calibration factors obtained using each methods show good agreement within 1.1%.
当中子测量仪在中子场中进行校准时,室内散射中子和空气散射中子的测量结果会因与源的距离以及中子校准室的大小、形状和结构而有所不同。ISO 8529-2推荐了四种校正这些影响的方法:阴影锥法、半经验法、广义拟合方法和简化拟合方法。在本研究中,针对韩国原子能研究所(KAERI)的中子场,使用阴影锥法和半经验法对中子散射效应进行了评估和比较。该中子场是通过将一个²⁵²Cf中子源放置在中子校准室的中心构建而成的。为了使用这两种校正方法比较中子散射效应,分别在二十个不同位置使用KAERI的邦纳球谱仪(BBS)和蒙特卡罗N粒子代码进行了测量和模拟。中子能谱由铕激活的碘化锂[⁶LiI(Eu)]闪烁体结合BBS进行测量。使用每种方法获得的校准因子在1.1%的范围内显示出良好的一致性。