Duan Jipeng, Yang Zhangxiang, He Xiaoyan, Shao Meixuan, Yin Jun
Department of Psychology, Ningbo University, No. 616 Fenghua Rd, Ningbo, 315211, China.
Exp Brain Res. 2018 Jan;236(1):117-127. doi: 10.1007/s00221-017-5111-4. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
This study explored whether social coordination information that extends beyond individual goals is attributed to impoverished movements produced by simple geometric shapes. We manipulated coordination information by presenting two chasers and one common target performing coordinated or individual (i.e., uncoordinated) chases, and measured mu rhythms (electroencephalogram oscillations within the 8-13 Hz range at sensorimotor regions) related to understanding social interactions. We found that although the participants' task was completely unrelated to processing chasing motion, mu rhythms were more suppressed for coordinated chasing than in the control condition (backward replay for chasing motion), and this effect disappeared for uncoordinated chasing. Moreover, mu suppression increased with higher post-test ratings of social coordination but did not correlate with uncoordinated information. Such effects cannot be explained by general attentional involvement, as there was no difference in attention-related occipital alpha suppression across conditions. These findings are consistent with interpretations of processing coordinated actions, suggesting that our visual system can automatically attribute social coordination information to motion, at least in chasing scenes.
本研究探讨了超越个体目标的社会协调信息是否归因于简单几何形状所产生的贫乏运动。我们通过呈现两个追逐者和一个共同目标进行协调或个体(即不协调)追逐来操纵协调信息,并测量与理解社会互动相关的μ节律(感觉运动区域内8-13赫兹范围内的脑电图振荡)。我们发现,尽管参与者的任务与处理追逐运动完全无关,但与控制条件(追逐运动的反向回放)相比,协调追逐时μ节律受到的抑制更强,而不协调追逐时这种效应消失。此外,μ抑制随着社会协调的测试后评分升高而增加,但与不协调信息无关。由于不同条件下与注意力相关的枕叶α抑制没有差异,这些效应无法用一般的注意力参与来解释。这些发现与对协调动作处理的解释一致,表明我们的视觉系统至少在追逐场景中可以自动将社会协调信息归因于运动。