• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《移动糖尿病侦探(MoDD)随机对照试验中 2 型糖尿病未得到满足的成年人的基线特征和技术培训》。

Baseline Characteristics and Technology Training of Underserved Adults With Type 2 Diabetes in the Mobile Diabetes Detective (MoDD) Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York (Dr Heitkemper, Dr Smaldone).

Department of Biomedical Informatics, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York (Dr Mamykina).

出版信息

Diabetes Educ. 2017 Dec;43(6):576-588. doi: 10.1177/0145721717737367. Epub 2017 Oct 23.

DOI:10.1177/0145721717737367
PMID:29059017
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5759770/
Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study is to describe the characteristics and technology training needs of underserved adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who participated in a health information technology (HIT) diabetes self-management education (DSME) intervention. Methods The baseline physiological, psychosocial, and technology use characteristics for 220 adults with poorly controlled T2DM were evaluated. Intervention participants received a 1-time intervention training, which included basic technology help, introduction to the Mobile Diabetes Detective (MoDD) website and text message features, and account activation that included subject-specific tailoring. Four additional on-site sessions for participants needing computer or Internet access or technology support were made available based on need. Data regarding on-site visits for usual care were collected. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and bivariate analysis. Results The participants were predominately Hispanic and female with a baseline mean A1C of 10% (86 mmol/mol). Only half of the participants regularly used computers or text messages in daily life. The average introductory MoDD training session lasted 73.6 minutes. Following training, approximately one-third (35%) of intervention participants returned for basic and MoDD-specific technology assistance at their federally qualified health center. The most frequently reported duration for the extra training sessions was 30 to 45 minutes. Conclusions Training and support needs were greater than anticipated. Diabetes educators should assess technology abilities prior to implementing health information technology (HIT) diabetes self-management education (DSME) in underserved adults. Future research must invest resources in technology access, anticipate subject training, and develop new training approaches to ensure HIT DSME use and engagement.

摘要

目的 本研究旨在描述参与健康信息技术(HIT)糖尿病自我管理教育(DSME)干预的服务不足的 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)成年人的特点和技术培训需求。

方法 评估了 220 名血糖控制不佳的 T2DM 成年人的基线生理、心理社会和技术使用特征。干预参与者接受了一次性干预培训,其中包括基本技术帮助、移动糖尿病侦探(MoDD)网站和短信功能介绍以及包括特定主题定制的账户激活。根据需要,为需要计算机或互联网访问或技术支持的参与者提供了另外四个现场会议。收集了有关常规护理现场访问的数据。使用描述性统计和双变量分析对数据进行分析。

结果 参与者主要是西班牙裔和女性,基线平均 A1C 为 10%(86 mmol/mol)。只有一半的参与者在日常生活中定期使用计算机或短信。平均入门 MoDD 培训课程持续 73.6 分钟。培训后,大约三分之一(35%)的干预参与者返回其联邦合格的健康中心接受基本和 MoDD 特定技术援助。报告的额外培训课程最频繁的持续时间为 30 至 45 分钟。

结论 培训和支持需求大于预期。糖尿病教育者应在向服务不足的成年人实施健康信息技术(HIT)糖尿病自我管理教育(DSME)之前评估技术能力。未来的研究必须投入资源解决技术获取问题、预测受试者培训需求并开发新的培训方法,以确保 HIT DSME 的使用和参与。

相似文献

1
Baseline Characteristics and Technology Training of Underserved Adults With Type 2 Diabetes in the Mobile Diabetes Detective (MoDD) Randomized Controlled Trial.《移动糖尿病侦探(MoDD)随机对照试验中 2 型糖尿病未得到满足的成年人的基线特征和技术培训》。
Diabetes Educ. 2017 Dec;43(6):576-588. doi: 10.1177/0145721717737367. Epub 2017 Oct 23.
2
Does Diabetes Distress Influence Clinical Response to an mHealth Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support Intervention?糖尿病困扰是否会影响移动医疗糖尿病自我管理教育和支持干预的临床反应?
Diabetes Educ. 2020 Jun;46(3):289-296. doi: 10.1177/0145721720913276. Epub 2020 Mar 31.
3
Effect of diabetes self-management education on glycemic control in Latino adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis.糖尿病自我管理教育对 2 型糖尿病拉丁裔成年人血糖控制的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Feb;103(2):266-275. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2019.09.009. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
4
Does diabetes self-management education in conjunction with primary care improve glycemic control in Hispanic patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.糖尿病自我管理教育与初级保健相结合能否改善西班牙裔患者的血糖控制?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetes Educ. 2015 Aug;41(4):472-84. doi: 10.1177/0145721715584404. Epub 2015 May 4.
5
Comparative Effectiveness and Maintenance of Diabetes Self-Management Education Interventions for Marshallese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Controlled Trial.比较 2 型糖尿病马绍尔群岛患者的糖尿病自我管理教育干预措施的有效性和维持情况:一项随机对照试验。
Diabetes Care. 2019 May;42(5):849-858. doi: 10.2337/dc18-1985. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
6
Effectiveness of text message based, diabetes self management support programme (SMS4BG): two arm, parallel randomised controlled trial.基于短信的糖尿病自我管理支持计划(SMS4BG)的有效性:双臂、平行随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2018 May 17;361:k1959. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k1959.
7
Do health information technology self-management interventions improve glycemic control in medically underserved adults with diabetes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.健康信息技术自我管理干预措施能否改善医疗服务不足的成年糖尿病患者的血糖控制?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Sep 1;24(5):1024-1035. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx025.
8
Design and patient characteristics of the randomized controlled trial TExT-MED + FANS A test of mHealth augmented social support added to a patient-focused text-messaging intervention for emergency department patients with poorly controlled diabetes.随机对照试验 TExT-MED+FANS 的设计和患者特征——一项对移动医疗增强型社会支持的测试,添加到针对急诊就诊的糖尿病控制不良患者的以患者为中心的短信干预中。
Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 May;80:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.03.003. Epub 2019 Mar 14.
9
Digital Storytelling Intervention for Hemoglobin A1c Control Among Hispanic Adults With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.数字叙事干预对 2 型糖尿病西班牙裔成年患者糖化血红蛋白控制的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2424781. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.24781.
10
Telehealth for diabetes self-management education and support in an underserved, free clinic population: A pilot study.针对服务不足的免费诊所人群开展糖尿病自我管理教育与支持的远程医疗:一项试点研究。
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2017 May-Jun;57(3):402-406. doi: 10.1016/j.japh.2017.01.019. Epub 2017 Mar 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Engagement in Hypertension and Diabetes Clinical Trials at Federally Qualified Health Centers: A Systematic Review.联邦合格健康中心参与高血压和糖尿病临床试验:一项系统评价。
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Apr 1;8(4):e255258. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.5258.
2
2022 National Standards for Diabetes Self-Management Education and Support.《2022年糖尿病自我管理教育与支持国家标准》
Diabetes Spectr. 2022 Spring;35(2):137-149. doi: 10.2337/ds22-ps02. Epub 2022 Mar 9.
3
The Efficacy of Health Information Technology in Supporting Health Equity for Black and Hispanic Patients With Chronic Diseases: Systematic Review.健康信息技术在支持慢性病的黑人和西班牙裔患者健康公平方面的疗效:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 4;24(4):e22124. doi: 10.2196/22124.
4
Integrating family and friend support, information technology, and diabetes education in community-centric diabetes self-management.以社区为中心的糖尿病自我管理中整合家庭和朋友支持、信息技术和糖尿病教育。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2021 Feb 15;28(2):261-275. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocaa223.
5
Secular Trends in Information Communications Technology: Access, Use, and Attitudes of Young and Older Patients With Diabetes.信息通信技术的长期趋势:糖尿病年轻和老年患者的获取、使用及态度
Diabetes Spectr. 2020 Feb;33(1):66-73. doi: 10.2337/ds18-0082.

本文引用的文献

1
Managing diabetes in the digital age.数字时代的糖尿病管理。
Clin Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015 Dec 1;1:16. doi: 10.1186/s40842-015-0016-2. eCollection 2015.
2
Do health information technology self-management interventions improve glycemic control in medically underserved adults with diabetes? A systematic review and meta-analysis.健康信息技术自我管理干预措施能否改善医疗服务不足的成年糖尿病患者的血糖控制?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Sep 1;24(5):1024-1035. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx025.
3
Diabetes Self-management Education and Support in Type 2 Diabetes.2型糖尿病的糖尿病自我管理教育与支持
Diabetes Educ. 2017 Feb;43(1):40-53. doi: 10.1177/0145721716689694.
4
American Diabetes Association Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes 2017.《2017年美国糖尿病协会糖尿病医疗护理标准》
J Diabetes. 2017 Apr;9(4):320-324. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12524.
5
Reasons why patients referred to diabetes education programmes choose not to attend: a systematic review.被转诊至糖尿病教育项目的患者选择不参加的原因:一项系统评价
Diabet Med. 2017 Jan;34(1):14-26. doi: 10.1111/dme.13120. Epub 2016 Apr 15.
6
Characteristics of the Spanish- and English-Language Self-Efficacy to Manage Diabetes Scales.西班牙语和英语版本的糖尿病自我管理效能感量表的特征
Diabetes Educ. 2016 Apr;42(2):167-77. doi: 10.1177/0145721716628648. Epub 2016 Feb 4.
7
Structured scaffolding for reflection and problem solving in diabetes self-management: qualitative study of mobile diabetes detective.用于糖尿病自我管理中反思与问题解决的结构化支架:移动糖尿病侦探的定性研究
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Jan;23(1):129-36. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocv169. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
8
Participatory approach to the development of a knowledge base for problem-solving in diabetes self-management.采用参与式方法构建糖尿病自我管理问题解决知识库。
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Jan;85(1):96-103. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.08.003. Epub 2015 Aug 8.
9
Current management of diabetes mellitus and future directions in care.糖尿病的当前管理及护理的未来方向。
Postgrad Med J. 2015 Nov;91(1081):612-21. doi: 10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-133200. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
10
Does diabetes self-management education in conjunction with primary care improve glycemic control in Hispanic patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis.糖尿病自我管理教育与初级保健相结合能否改善西班牙裔患者的血糖控制?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetes Educ. 2015 Aug;41(4):472-84. doi: 10.1177/0145721715584404. Epub 2015 May 4.