Suppr超能文献

再次主动脉瓣置换术的简约评估;左心室射血分数降低和肾功能损害的威慑作用。

Parsimonious assessment for reoperative aortic valve replacement; the deterrent effect of low left ventricular ejection fraction and renal impairment.

作者信息

Yammine Maroun, Ramirez-Del Val Fernando, Ejiofor Julius I, Neely Robert C, Shi Diana, McGurk Siobhan, Aranki Sary F, Kaneko Tsuyoshi, Shekar Prem S

机构信息

Division of Cardiac Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Ann Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Sep;6(5):484-492. doi: 10.21037/acs.2017.08.03.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient comorbidities play a pivotal role in the surgical outcomes of reoperative aortic valve replacement (re-AVR). Low left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and renal insufficiency (Cr >2 mg/dL) are known independent surgical risk factors. Improved preoperative risk assessment can help determine the best therapeutic approach. We hypothesize that re-AVR patients with low LVEF and concomitant renal insufficiency have a prohibitive surgical risk and may benefit from transcatheter AVR (TAVR).

METHODS

From January 2002 to March 2013, we reviewed 232 patients who underwent isolated re-AVR. Patients older than 80 years were excluded to adjust for unobserved frailty. We identified 37 patients with a ≤35% LVEF (low ejection fraction group-LEF) and 195 patients with >35% LVEF (High ejection fraction group-HEF).

RESULTS

The mean age was 68.4±11.5 years and there were more females (86.5% versus 64.1%, P=0.007) in the LEF group. The prevalence of renal insufficiency was higher in LEF patients (27% versus 5.6%, P=0.001). Higher operative mortality (13.5% versus 3.1%, P=0.018) was observed in the LEF group. Stroke rates were similar in both groups (8.1% versus 4.1%, P=0.39). Unadjusted cumulative survival was significantly lower in LEF patients (6.6 years, 95% CI: 5.2-8.0, versus 9.7 years, 95% CI: 8.9-10.4, P=0.024). In patients without renal insufficiency, LEF and HEF had similar survival (8.3 years, 95% CI: 7.1-9.5, versus 9.9 years, 95% CI: 9.1-10.6, P=0.90). Contrarily, in patients with renal insufficiency, LEF led to a significantly lower survival (1.1 years, 95% CI: 0.1-2.0, versus 4.8 years, 95% CI: 2.2-7.3, P=0.050). Adjusted survival analysis revealed elevations in baseline creatinine (HR =4.28, P<0.001) and LEF (HR =5.33, P=0.041) as significant predictors of long-term survival, with a significant interaction between these comorbidities (HR =7.28, P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

In re-AVR patients, low LVEF (≤35%) is associated with increased operative mortality. Concomitant renal insufficiency in these patients results in a prohibitively low cumulative survival. These reoperative surgical outcomes should warrant expanding the role of TAVR for reoperative patients with LEF and renal impairment.

摘要

背景

患者合并症在再次主动脉瓣置换术(re-AVR)的手术结果中起关键作用。已知左心室射血分数(LVEF)降低和肾功能不全(肌酐>2mg/dL)是独立的手术危险因素。改善术前风险评估有助于确定最佳治疗方法。我们假设LVEF降低且伴有肾功能不全的re-AVR患者手术风险过高,可能从经导管主动脉瓣置换术(TAVR)中获益。

方法

2002年1月至2013年3月,我们回顾了232例行单纯re-AVR的患者。排除年龄大于80岁的患者以校正未观察到的虚弱因素。我们确定了37例LVEF≤35%的患者(低射血分数组-LEF)和195例LVEF>35%的患者(高射血分数组-HEF)。

结果

平均年龄为68.4±11.5岁,LEF组女性更多(86.5%对64.1%,P=0.007)。LEF患者肾功能不全的患病率更高(27%对5.6%,P=0.001)。LEF组观察到更高的手术死亡率(13.5%对3.1%,P=0.018)。两组的卒中发生率相似(8.1%对4.1%,P=0.39)。未调整的累积生存率在LEF患者中显著更低(6.6年,95%CI:5.2 - 8.0,对9.7年,95%CI:8.9 - )。

相似文献

2
Reoperative aortic valve replacement in the octogenarians-minimally invasive technique in the era of transcatheter valve replacement.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014 Jan;147(1):155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.08.076. Epub 2013 Nov 1.
3
Impact of classic and paradoxical low flow on survival after aortic valve replacement for severe aortic stenosis.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Feb 24;65(7):645-53. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.11.047.
6
7
Impact of low flow on the outcome of high-risk patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Aug 27;62(9):782-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.05.044. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
10

本文引用的文献

3
Transcatheter versus surgical aortic valve replacement in patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft operation: a PARTNER trial subgroup analysis.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Jul;98(1):1-7; discussion 7-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.02.079. Epub 2014 Jun 2.
7
Outcome of redo surgical aortic valve replacement in patients 80 years and older: results from the Multicenter RECORD Initiative.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Feb;97(2):537-43. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.09.007. Epub 2013 Sep 11.
9
The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement (AVR) Composite Score: a report of the STS Quality Measurement Task Force.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Dec;94(6):2166-71. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.08.120. Epub 2012 Nov 3.
10
Clinical outcomes of redo valvular operations: a 20-year experience.
Ann Thorac Surg. 2012 Dec;94(6):2011-6. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.06.045. Epub 2012 Aug 2.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验