Saito Taichi, Malay Sunitha, Chung Kevin C
Ann Arbor, Mich.; and Okayama, Japan.
From the Section of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Health System; the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Density, and Pharmaceutical Sciences; and the Department of Surgery, University of Michigan Medical School.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Nov;140(5):697e-708e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003750.
Evidence regarding the effectiveness of arthroscopic débridement for a triangular fibrocartilage complex tear is uncertain. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of outcomes to evaluate the effectiveness of débridement for triangular fibrocartilage complex tears.
The authors searched all available literature in the PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE (Ovid) databases for articles reporting on triangular fibrocartilage complex tear débridement. Data collection included arc of motion, grip strength, patient-reported outcomes, and complications.
A total of 1723 unique studies were identified, of which 18 studies met the authors' criteria. The mean before and after arc of wrist extension/flexion motion values were 120 and 146 degrees (six studies). The mean before and after grip strength values were 65 percent and 91 percent of the contralateral side (10 studies). Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores (six studies) and pain visual analogue scale scores (seven studies) improved from 39 to 18, and from 7 to 3, respectively. The mean pain visual analogue scale score after débridement was 1.9 in the ulnar-positive group and 2.4 in the ulnar-neutral and ulnar-negative groups. Eighty-seven percent of patients returned to their original work.
Patients reported reduced pain and improved functional and patient-reported outcomes after débridement of triangular fibrocartilage complex tears. Most patients after débridement returned to previous work, with few complications. Although some of these cases may require secondary procedures, simple débridement can be performed with suitable satisfactory outcomes for cases with any type of ulnar variance.
关于关节镜下清创治疗三角纤维软骨复合体撕裂有效性的证据尚不明确。本研究的目的是对相关结果进行系统评价,以评估清创治疗三角纤维软骨复合体撕裂的有效性。
作者在PubMed、Embase和MEDLINE(Ovid)数据库中检索了所有关于三角纤维软骨复合体撕裂清创治疗的文献。数据收集包括活动弧度、握力、患者报告的结果和并发症。
共识别出1723项独特研究,其中18项研究符合作者的标准。手腕屈伸活动弧度的术前和术后平均值分别为120度和146度(6项研究)。握力术前和术后平均值分别为对侧的65%和91%(10项研究)。手臂、肩部和手部功能障碍评分(6项研究)和疼痛视觉模拟量表评分(7项研究)分别从39分改善至18分和从7分改善至3分。清创术后尺侧阳性组疼痛视觉模拟量表平均评分为1.9,尺侧中立和尺侧阴性组为2.4。87%的患者恢复了原工作。
患者报告称,三角纤维软骨复合体撕裂清创术后疼痛减轻,功能和患者报告的结果得到改善。大多数患者清创术后恢复了原工作,并发症较少。尽管其中一些病例可能需要二次手术,但对于任何类型尺骨变异的病例,简单清创均可取得满意的效果。