Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, and Gentofte Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Parker Institute, Copenhagen University Hospital, and Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018 Aug;70(8):1206-1217. doi: 10.1002/acr.23455. Epub 2018 May 29.
To assess the importance of trial characteristics as contextual factors when evaluating the treatment effect of targeted therapies for patients with psoriatic disease.
We identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating targeted therapies approved for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and psoriasis (8 biologics and apremilast). The effect of targeted therapies was analyzed in the 2 psoriatic conditions combined by using drug retention as a common outcome, and separately by using the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (ACR20) for PsA and the Psoriasis Area Severity Index 75% improvement score (PASI75) for psoriasis. We explored potential effect modification of trial characteristics in stratified and meta-regression analyses. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated and compared among the trial eligibility criteria via the ratio of ORs.
Forty-eight PsA and psoriasis trials (51 comparisons; 17,737 patients) were eligible. Overall retention was OR 2.16 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.70-2.75) with higher odds for PsA trials compared with psoriasis trials (ratio of ORs 2.55 [95% CI 1.64-3.97]). The eligibility criteria "targeted therapy history," "minimum required disease duration," "required negative rheumatoid factor," and "required Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis criteria" were of importance for achieving ACR20 in PsA. The eligibility criterion "minimum required disease duration" was of importance for achieving PASI75 in psoriasis. A total of 7 PsA trials had rescue before time-point-of-retention reporting (adaptive trials).
From this exploratory meta-epidemiologic study, we now have evidence from RCTs to support the notion that patients with PsA are more likely to adhere to targeted therapies compared to patients with psoriasis. Furthermore, we identified a few contextual factors of importance in regard to achieving ACR20 in PsA trials and PASI75 in psoriasis trials.
评估试验特征作为背景因素在评估针对银屑病患者的靶向治疗的治疗效果时的重要性。
我们确定了评估批准用于银屑病关节炎(PsA)和银屑病(8 种生物制剂和阿普米司特)的靶向治疗的随机对照试验(RCT)。通过将药物保留作为共同结局,综合分析了 2 种银屑病疾病中靶向治疗的效果,并分别使用美国风湿病学会 20%改善标准(ACR20)评估 PsA 和银屑病面积严重程度指数 75%改善评分(PASI75)评估银屑病。我们通过比值比(OR)的比值探索了试验特征在分层和荟萃回归分析中的潜在效应修饰。
符合条件的 48 项 PsA 和银屑病试验(51 项比较;17737 例患者)。总体保留率为 OR2.16(95%置信区间[95%CI]1.70-2.75),与银屑病试验相比,PsA 试验的保留率更高(OR 比值 2.55[95%CI1.64-3.97])。对于实现 PsA 的 ACR20,入选标准“靶向治疗史”、“最小必需疾病持续时间”、“必需阴性类风湿因子”和“必需银屑病关节炎分类标准”很重要。入选标准“最小必需疾病持续时间”对于实现银屑病的 PASI75 很重要。共有 7 项 PsA 试验在保留时间报告之前有抢救(适应性试验)。
从这项探索性的荟萃流行病学研究中,我们现在有 RCT 的证据支持这样的观点,即与银屑病患者相比,PsA 患者更有可能坚持靶向治疗。此外,我们确定了一些在实现 PsA 试验的 ACR20 和银屑病试验的 PASI75 方面重要的背景因素。