• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

孕早期产科预测模型的外部验证研究(期望研究I):研究方案与人群特征

External Validation Study of First Trimester Obstetric Prediction Models (Expect Study I): Research Protocol and Population Characteristics.

作者信息

Meertens Linda Jacqueline Elisabeth, Scheepers Hubertina Cj, De Vries Raymond G, Dirksen Carmen D, Korstjens Irene, Mulder Antonius Lm, Nieuwenhuijze Marianne J, Nijhuis Jan G, Spaanderman Marc Ea, Smits Luc Jm

机构信息

Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Department of Epidemiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.

School for Oncology and Developmental Biology (GROW), Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, Netherlands.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Oct 26;6(10):e203. doi: 10.2196/resprot.7837.

DOI:10.2196/resprot.7837
PMID:29074472
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5680517/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A number of first-trimester prediction models addressing important obstetric outcomes have been published. However, most models have not been externally validated. External validation is essential before implementing a prediction model in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this paper is to describe the design of a study to externally validate existing first trimester obstetric prediction models, based upon maternal characteristics and standard measurements (eg, blood pressure), for the risk of pre-eclampsia (PE), gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), spontaneous preterm birth (PTB), small-for-gestational-age (SGA) infants, and large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants among Dutch pregnant women (Expect Study I). The results of a pilot study on the feasibility and acceptability of the recruitment process and the comprehensibility of the Pregnancy Questionnaire 1 are also reported.

METHODS

A multicenter prospective cohort study was performed in The Netherlands between July 1, 2013 and December 31, 2015. First trimester obstetric prediction models were systematically selected from the literature. Predictor variables were measured by the Web-based Pregnancy Questionnaire 1 and pregnancy outcomes were established using the Postpartum Questionnaire 1 and medical records. Information about maternal health-related quality of life, costs, and satisfaction with Dutch obstetric care was collected from a subsample of women. A pilot study was carried out before the official start of inclusion. External validity of the models will be evaluated by assessing discrimination and calibration.

RESULTS

Based on the pilot study, minor improvements were made to the recruitment process and online Pregnancy Questionnaire 1. The validation cohort consists of 2614 women. Data analysis of the external validation study is in progress.

CONCLUSIONS

This study will offer insight into the generalizability of existing, non-invasive first trimester prediction models for various obstetric outcomes in a Dutch obstetric population. An impact study for the evaluation of the best obstetric prediction models in the Dutch setting with respect to their effect on clinical outcomes, costs, and quality of life-Expect Study II-is being planned.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Netherlands Trial Registry (NTR): NTR4143; http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=4143 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6t8ijtpd9).

摘要

背景

已经发表了许多针对重要产科结局的孕早期预测模型。然而,大多数模型尚未经过外部验证。在临床实践中应用预测模型之前,外部验证至关重要。

目的

本文的目的是描述一项研究的设计,该研究旨在基于孕妇特征和标准测量值(如血压),对荷兰孕妇子痫前期(PE)、妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)、自发性早产(PTB)、小于胎龄儿(SGA)和大于胎龄儿(LGA)的风险,对现有的孕早期产科预测模型进行外部验证(期望研究I)。还报告了一项关于招募过程的可行性和可接受性以及妊娠问卷1的可理解性的试点研究结果。

方法

2013年7月1日至2015年12月31日在荷兰进行了一项多中心前瞻性队列研究。从文献中系统地选择孕早期产科预测模型。预测变量通过基于网络的妊娠问卷1进行测量,妊娠结局通过产后问卷1和医疗记录确定。从一部分女性子样本中收集有关孕产妇健康相关生活质量、成本以及对荷兰产科护理满意度的信息。在正式纳入研究开始前进行了一项试点研究。将通过评估区分度和校准来评估模型的外部有效性。

结果

基于试点研究,对招募过程和在线妊娠问卷1进行了一些小的改进。验证队列由2614名女性组成。外部验证研究的数据分析正在进行中。

结论

本研究将深入了解现有非侵入性孕早期预测模型在荷兰产科人群中对各种产科结局的可推广性。正在计划一项影响研究,以评估荷兰环境中最佳产科预测模型对临床结局、成本和生活质量的影响——期望研究II。

试验注册

荷兰试验注册中心(NTR):NTR4143;http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=4143(由WebCite存档于http://www.webcitation.org/6t8ijtpd9)

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2612/5680517/5e55b6062b25/resprot_v6i10e203_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2612/5680517/5e55b6062b25/resprot_v6i10e203_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2612/5680517/5e55b6062b25/resprot_v6i10e203_fig1.jpg

相似文献

1
External Validation Study of First Trimester Obstetric Prediction Models (Expect Study I): Research Protocol and Population Characteristics.孕早期产科预测模型的外部验证研究(期望研究I):研究方案与人群特征
JMIR Res Protoc. 2017 Oct 26;6(10):e203. doi: 10.2196/resprot.7837.
2
Implementation and Effects of Risk-Dependent Obstetric Care in the Netherlands (Expect Study II): Protocol for an Impact Study.荷兰风险依赖性产科护理的实施与效果(期望研究II):一项影响研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 May 4;7(5):e10066. doi: 10.2196/10066.
3
External validation and clinical usefulness of first-trimester prediction models for small- and large-for-gestational-age infants: a prospective cohort study.早孕期预测胎儿大小与实际出生大小不相符的预测模型的外部验证及其临床实用性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BJOG. 2019 Mar;126(4):472-484. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15516. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
4
External Validation and Clinical Usefulness of First Trimester Prediction Models for the Risk of Preeclampsia: A Prospective Cohort Study.早孕期子痫前期风险预测模型的外部验证及临床应用:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2019;45(6):381-393. doi: 10.1159/000490385. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
5
Adherence rates to a prediction tool identifying women with an increased gestational diabetes risk: An implementation study.预测工具识别妊娠期糖尿病风险增加的女性的依从率:一项实施研究。
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2021 Jul;154(1):85-91. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13517. Epub 2021 Jan 5.
6
External validation of prognostic models to predict risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in one Dutch cohort: prospective multicentre cohort study.预测荷兰队列中妊娠期糖尿病风险的预后模型的外部验证:前瞻性多中心队列研究。
BMJ. 2016 Aug 30;354:i4338. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4338.
7
Chronic hypertension and adverse pregnancy outcome: a cohort study.慢性高血压与不良妊娠结局:队列研究。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;50(2):228-235. doi: 10.1002/uog.17493. Epub 2017 Jun 22.
8
Use and Effects of Patient Access to Medical Records in General Practice Through a Personal Health Record in the Netherlands: Protocol for a Mixed-Methods Study.荷兰通过个人健康记录让患者获取全科医疗记录的使用情况及效果:一项混合方法研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 Sep 21;7(9):e10193. doi: 10.2196/10193.
9
Sugarsquare, a Web-Based Patient Portal for Parents of a Child With Type 1 Diabetes: Multicenter Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial.Sugarsquare,一个面向1型糖尿病患儿家长的基于网络的患者门户:多中心随机对照可行性试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Aug 22;19(8):e287. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6639.
10
Effect and Process Evaluation of e-Powered Parents, a Web-Based Support Program for Parents of Children With a Chronic Kidney Disease: Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial.电子助力父母项目的效果与过程评估:一项针对慢性肾病患儿家长的基于网络的支持项目可行性随机对照试验
J Med Internet Res. 2018 Aug 1;20(8):e245. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9547.

引用本文的文献

1
Development and validation of prediction models for fetal growth restriction and birthweight: an individual participant data meta-analysis.胎儿生长受限和出生体重预测模型的建立与验证:个体参与者数据的荟萃分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2024 Aug;28(47):1-119. doi: 10.3310/DABW4814.
2
Development and validation of a prognostic model to predict birth weight: individual participant data meta-analysis.预测出生体重的预后模型的开发与验证:个体参与者数据荟萃分析
BMJ Med. 2024 Aug 14;3(1):e000784. doi: 10.1136/bmjmed-2023-000784. eCollection 2024.
3
Counseling pregnant women on calcium: effects on calcium intake.

本文引用的文献

1
Macrosomia.巨大儿
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2017 Jan;38:83-96. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2016.08.003. Epub 2016 Sep 15.
2
External validation of prognostic models to predict risk of gestational diabetes mellitus in one Dutch cohort: prospective multicentre cohort study.预测荷兰队列中妊娠期糖尿病风险的预后模型的外部验证:前瞻性多中心队列研究。
BMJ. 2016 Aug 30;354:i4338. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4338.
3
The performance of risk prediction models for pre-eclampsia using routinely collected maternal characteristics and comparison with models that include specialised tests and with clinical guideline decision rules: a systematic review.
对孕妇进行钙咨询:对钙摄入量的影响。
J Perinat Med. 2022 Aug 23;51(3):346-355. doi: 10.1515/jpm-2021-0376. Print 2023 Mar 28.
4
External validation and clinical utility of prognostic prediction models for gestational diabetes mellitus: A prospective cohort study.预测妊娠期糖尿病预后的预测模型的外部验证和临床实用性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Jul;99(7):891-900. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13811. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
5
Low-dose-aspirin usage among women with an increased preeclampsia risk: A prospective cohort study.低剂量阿司匹林在子痫前期风险增加的女性中的使用:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020 Jul;99(7):875-883. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13808. Epub 2020 Jan 31.
6
External validation and clinical usefulness of first-trimester prediction models for small- and large-for-gestational-age infants: a prospective cohort study.早孕期预测胎儿大小与实际出生大小不相符的预测模型的外部验证及其临床实用性:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BJOG. 2019 Mar;126(4):472-484. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15516. Epub 2019 Jan 17.
7
External Validation and Clinical Usefulness of First Trimester Prediction Models for the Risk of Preeclampsia: A Prospective Cohort Study.早孕期子痫前期风险预测模型的外部验证及临床应用:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2019;45(6):381-393. doi: 10.1159/000490385. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
8
Implementation and Effects of Risk-Dependent Obstetric Care in the Netherlands (Expect Study II): Protocol for an Impact Study.荷兰风险依赖性产科护理的实施与效果(期望研究II):一项影响研究的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2018 May 4;7(5):e10066. doi: 10.2196/10066.
9
Prediction models for the risk of spontaneous preterm birth based on maternal characteristics: a systematic review and independent external validation.基于孕产妇特征的自发性早产风险预测模型:系统评价与独立外部验证
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2018 Aug;97(8):907-920. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13358. Epub 2018 May 9.
基于常规收集的孕产妇特征对先兆子痫进行风险预测模型的性能评估,以及与包括专科检查和临床指南决策规则的模型进行比较:系统评价。
BJOG. 2016 Aug;123(9):1441-52. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14029. Epub 2016 May 26.
4
Gestational Diabetes Mellitus:current knowledge and unmet needs.妊娠期糖尿病:当前认知与未满足的需求
J Diabetes. 2016 Nov;8(6):770-781. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12422. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
5
Pre-eclampsia.子痫前期。
Lancet. 2016 Mar 5;387(10022):999-1011. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00070-7. Epub 2015 Sep 2.
6
Prognostic models in obstetrics: available, but far from applicable.产科预后模型:虽已存在,但远未达到可应用的程度。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Jan;214(1):79-90.e36. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.06.013. Epub 2015 Jun 10.
7
TNF-R1 as a first trimester marker for prediction of pre-eclampsia.肿瘤坏死因子受体1作为预测子痫前期的孕早期标志物。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016 Mar;29(6):897-903. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2015.1022865. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
8
First-Trimester Screening for Gestational Diabetes Mellitus Based on Maternal Characteristics and History.基于母亲特征和病史的孕早期妊娠期糖尿病筛查
Fetal Diagn Ther. 2015;38(1):14-21. doi: 10.1159/000369970. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
9
Risk assessment for preeclampsia in nulliparous women at 11-13 weeks gestational age: prospective evaluation of two algorithms.11-13 孕周初产妇子痫前期风险评估:两种算法的前瞻性评估。
BJOG. 2015 Dec;122(13):1781-8. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13194. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
10
A new framework to enhance the interpretation of external validation studies of clinical prediction models.一种增强临床预测模型外部验证研究解释的新框架。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Mar;68(3):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.06.018. Epub 2014 Aug 30.