Woo Seung Hun, Bae Su-Young, Chung Hyung-Jin
1 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Research Institute for Convergence of Biomedical Science and Technology, Pusan National University Yangsan Hospital, Yangsan, Republic of Korea.
2 Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Inje University, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
Foot Ankle Int. 2018 Jan;39(1):35-45. doi: 10.1177/1071100717732383. Epub 2017 Oct 27.
There is no consensus on the optimal treatment or preferred method of operation for the management of acute deltoid ligament injuries during an ankle fracture fixation. This study aimed to analyze the outcomes of repairing the deltoid ligament during the fixation of an ankle fracture compared to conservative management.
We retrospectively evaluated 78 consecutive cases of a ruptured deltoid ligament with an associated ankle fracture between 2001 and 2016. All of the ankle fractures were treated with a plate and screw fixation. Patients in the conservative treatment for ruptured deltoid ligament underwent management from 2001 to 2008 (37 fractures, group 1), while the operative treatment for ruptured deltoid ligament was included from 2009 to 2016 (41 fractures, group 2). The outcome measures included radiographic findings, the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society ankle-hindfoot scores, visual analog scale scores, and the Foot Function Index. All patients were followed for an average of 17 months.
Radiologic findings in both groups were comparable, but the final follow-up of the medial clear space (MCS) was significantly smaller in the group 2 ( P < .01). Clinical outcomes were similar between the two groups ( P > .05). Comparing those who underwent syndesmotic fixation between both groups, group 2 showed a significantly smaller final follow-up MCS, and all clinical outcomes were better in group 2 ( P < .05). Linear regression analysis showed that the final follow-up MCS had a significant influence on clinical outcomes ( P < .05).
Although the clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the 2 groups, we obtained a more favorable final follow-up MCS in the deltoid repair group. Particularly when accompanied by a syndesmotic injury, the final follow-up MCS and the clinical outcomes were better in the deltoid repair group. In the case of high-grade unstable fractures of the ankle with syndesmotic instability, a direct repair of the deltoid ligament was adequate for restoring medial stability.
Level III, retrospective comparative case series.
对于踝关节骨折固定术中急性三角韧带损伤的最佳治疗方法或首选手术方式,目前尚无共识。本研究旨在分析与保守治疗相比,踝关节骨折固定术中修复三角韧带的效果。
我们回顾性评估了2001年至2016年间连续78例伴有踝关节骨折的三角韧带断裂病例。所有踝关节骨折均采用钢板螺钉固定。2001年至2008年对三角韧带断裂患者进行保守治疗(37例骨折,第1组),2009年至2016年纳入三角韧带断裂的手术治疗(41例骨折,第2组)。结果指标包括影像学表现、美国矫形足踝协会踝后足评分、视觉模拟量表评分和足部功能指数。所有患者平均随访17个月。
两组的影像学表现相当,但第2组末次随访时内侧间隙(MCS)明显更小(P <.01)。两组的临床结果相似(P >.05)。比较两组中接受下胫腓联合固定的患者,第2组末次随访时MCS明显更小,且第2组所有临床结果均更好(P <.05)。线性回归分析表明,末次随访时MCS对临床结果有显著影响(P <.05)。
虽然两组的临床结果无显著差异,但我们在三角韧带修复组获得了更有利的末次随访MCS。特别是伴有下胫腓联合损伤时,三角韧带修复组的末次随访MCS和临床结果更好。对于伴有下胫腓联合不稳定的踝关节高位不稳定骨折,直接修复三角韧带足以恢复内侧稳定性。
III级,回顾性比较病例系列。