• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

热疗与冷冻疗法治疗皮肤疣的临床疗效和安全性比较:一项随机对照试验。

Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety of thermotherapy versus cryotherapy in treatment of skin warts: A randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Razi Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.

Center for Research & Training in Skin Disease & Leprosy, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Dermatol Ther. 2018 Jan;31(1). doi: 10.1111/dth.12564. Epub 2017 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1111/dth.12564
PMID:29082602
Abstract

The effect of thermotherapy in the treatment of skin warts in comparison to cryotherapy, as the standard conventional method, has remained uncertain. This study aimed to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of thermotherapy and cryotherapy in removing skin warts. This randomized controlled trial was conducted on 52 patients aged 18 years and over with ≤ 10 skin warts. The participants were randomly assigned into two groups to receive cryotherapy (every 2 to 3 weeks up to six sessions if required) or thermotherapy (one session). The patients in both groups were followed every 2 to 3 weeks for the first three months, and then three months after the last treatment session. The clearance rate was 79.2% in the thermotherapy group and 58.3% in the cryotherapy group with no significant difference (p = 0.212). The rate of scarring in the thermotherapy group was 20% (p = .018). A higher clearance rate was achieved in the thermotherapy group. However, this result was not statistically significant. There were some minimal post-treatment complications. Patients needed only one session of thermotherapy. Due to the risk of scarring, we suggest thermotherapy only as a suitable treatment method for palmoplantar warts.

摘要

热疗治疗皮肤疣与冷冻疗法(作为标准常规方法)的效果仍不确定。本研究旨在评估热疗和冷冻疗法去除皮肤疣的临床疗效和安全性。这是一项随机对照试验,共纳入 52 名年龄在 18 岁及以上、皮肤疣数≤10 的患者。参与者被随机分为两组,分别接受冷冻疗法(每 2-3 周进行一次,最多 6 次,如果需要)或热疗(一次)。两组患者在前 3 个月每 2-3 周随访一次,然后在最后一次治疗后 3 个月随访一次。热疗组的清除率为 79.2%,冷冻组为 58.3%,差异无统计学意义(p=0.212)。热疗组的瘢痕形成率为 20%(p=0.018)。热疗组的清除率较高。然而,这一结果没有统计学意义。治疗后有一些轻微的并发症。患者只需接受一次热疗。由于存在瘢痕形成的风险,我们建议仅将热疗作为掌跖疣的一种合适治疗方法。

相似文献

1
Comparison of clinical efficacy and safety of thermotherapy versus cryotherapy in treatment of skin warts: A randomized controlled trial.热疗与冷冻疗法治疗皮肤疣的临床疗效和安全性比较:一项随机对照试验。
Dermatol Ther. 2018 Jan;31(1). doi: 10.1111/dth.12564. Epub 2017 Oct 30.
2
A multi center real world observation to evaluate the efficacy of cryotherapy versus local hyperthermia for the treatment of plane warts.一项多中心真实世界观察研究,旨在评估冷冻疗法与局部热疗治疗扁平疣的疗效。
Dermatol Ther. 2022 May;35(5):e15403. doi: 10.1111/dth.15403. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
3
Cryotherapy versus salicylic acid for the treatment of plantar warts (verrucae): a randomised controlled trial.冷冻疗法与水杨酸治疗足底疣(跖疣)的随机对照试验。
BMJ. 2011 Jun 7;342:d3271. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d3271.
4
Intralesional immunotherapy compared to cryotherapy in the treatment of warts.病灶内免疫疗法与冷冻疗法治疗疣的比较。
Int J Dermatol. 2017 Apr;56(4):474-478. doi: 10.1111/ijd.13535. Epub 2017 Jan 21.
5
To Compare Efficacy Between Cryotherapy And Mitomycin Microneedling For The Treatment Of Plantar Warts.比较冷冻疗法与丝裂霉素微针治疗跖疣的疗效。
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2023 Feb-Mar;35(1):133-136. doi: 10.55519/JAMC-01-10932.
6
Comparison of 40% trichloroacetic acid and cryotherapy for the treatment of plantar warts: A single-blind, randomized clinical trial.40% 三氯乙酸与冷冻疗法治疗跖疣的比较:一项单盲随机临床试验。
Dermatol Ther. 2020 Jul;33(4):e13559. doi: 10.1111/dth.13559. Epub 2020 May 26.
7
Comparison of the efficacy of intralesional 5-fluorouracil/lidocaine/epinephrine injection with cryotherapy to treat common and palmoplantar warts: A randomized, controlled trial.比较瘤内注射 5-氟尿嘧啶/利多卡因/肾上腺素与冷冻疗法治疗寻常疣和跖疣的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
Dermatol Ther. 2022 Sep;35(9):e15726. doi: 10.1111/dth.15726. Epub 2022 Jul 31.
8
The efficacy and safety of other cryotherapy compounds for the treatment of genital warts: a randomized controlled trial.其他冷冻疗法化合物治疗尖锐湿疣的疗效和安全性:一项随机对照试验。
J Dermatolog Treat. 2019 Mar;30(2):176-178. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2018.1480745. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
9
Needling versus liquid nitrogen cryotherapy for the treatment of pedal warts a randomized controlled pilot study.针刺与液氮冷冻疗法治疗跖疣的随机对照试验性研究
J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2014 Jul;104(4):394-401. doi: 10.7547/0003-0538-104.4.394.
10
Efficacy and safety of intralesional tuberculin purified protein derivative versus cryotherapy in the treatment of warts: An assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial.局部注射结核菌素纯化蛋白衍生物与冷冻疗法治疗疣的疗效和安全性:一项评估者设盲、随机对照试验。
Dermatol Ther. 2021 Sep;34(5):e15080. doi: 10.1111/dth.15080. Epub 2021 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
The efficacy of cryotherapy compared to other modalities in the management of palmoplantar warts: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.冷冻疗法与其他治疗方式相比在掌跖疣治疗中的疗效:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Dermatol Reports. 2025 May 23;17(2). doi: 10.4081/dr.2024.10121. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
2
Successful Treatment of Multiple Plantar and Periungual Warts by Local Hyperthermia Treatment: A Case Report.局部热疗成功治疗多发性跖疣和甲周疣:一例报告
Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol. 2023 Apr 7;16:981-985. doi: 10.2147/CCID.S408406. eCollection 2023.
3
Local Hyperthermia Versus Cryotherapy for Treatment of Plantar Warts: A Prospective Multi-centre Non-randomized Concurrent Controlled Clinical Trial.
局部热疗与冷冻疗法治疗足底疣:一项前瞻性多中心非随机同期对照临床试验。
Acta Derm Venereol. 2022 Feb 28;102:adv00655. doi: 10.2340/actadv.v102.1082.
4
The Application of Machine Learning in Predicting Outcome of Cryotherapy and Immunotherapy for Wart Removal.机器学习在预测冷冻疗法和免疫疗法去除疣的效果中的应用。
Ann Dermatol. 2021 Aug;33(4):345-350. doi: 10.5021/ad.2021.33.4.345. Epub 2021 Jul 1.