Dosunmu Adedoyin Owolabi, Akinbami Akinsegun Abduljaleel, Ismail Ayobami Kamal, Olaiya Modupe Adebimpe, Uche Ebele Ifeyinwa, Aile Igbinoba Kingsley
Department of Haematology and Blood Transfusion, Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, Ikeja, Nigeria.
Lagos State Blood Transfusion Committee, Lagos Island Maternity Hospital, Lagos, Nigeria.
Niger Postgrad Med J. 2017 Jul-Sep;24(3):162-167. doi: 10.4103/npmj.npmj_33_17.
Blood transfusion practice emphasises safety, efficacy and appropriate use. These require cost-effective programme management. This study focused on the cost of screening for transfusion transmissible infections (TTI).
This was a 1 year (2016) analysis of screening in a hospital-based transfusion centre. The cost of screening all blood donors by ELISA was compared to the cost of serial screening starting from rapid kit, taking into account, the estimated cost of blood bags prevented from discard after ELISA screening (attributable cost). The cost of voluntary donor drive plus cost of ELISA screening was compared with the present cost of screening.
A total of 5591 donors were screened for HIV, hepatitis B and C using the rapid kit, 291 donors were deferred (5.2%). A total of 5300 units were further screened by ELISA. A total of 435 blood units (8.2%) were discarded due to TTI positivity. TTI positivity rate was 12.98%. Only 2.36% were voluntary donors and among these 9.1% were TTI positive. The attributable cost of serial screening was 55,653.5 USD while that of screening by ELISA only was 55,910 USD. The attributable cost of rapid screening for only hepatitis B and then ELISA was 53,313.9 USD taking into consideration that 187 blood units would be prevented from undue discard.
This analysis demonstrated that with proper donor selection, rapid screening for hepatitis B virus only before ELISA screening is more cost-effective. This will also reduce the waiting time for donors and counselling if HIV positive.
输血实践强调安全性、有效性和合理使用。这些都需要具有成本效益的项目管理。本研究聚焦于输血传播感染(TTI)筛查的成本。
这是一项对一家医院输血中心2016年为期1年的筛查分析。将采用酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)对所有献血者进行筛查的成本与从快速检测试剂盒开始进行系列筛查的成本进行比较,同时考虑到ELISA筛查后可避免废弃血袋的估计成本(可归因成本)。将自愿献血招募成本加上ELISA筛查成本与当前筛查成本进行比较。
使用快速检测试剂盒对5591名献血者进行了HIV、乙型肝炎和丙型肝炎筛查,291名献血者被延期献血(5.2%)。共对5300个单位的血液进一步进行了ELISA筛查。共有435个血液单位(8.2%)因TTI阳性而被废弃。TTI阳性率为12.98%。自愿献血者仅占2.36%,其中9.1%为TTI阳性。系列筛查的可归因成本为55,653.5美元,而仅采用ELISA筛查的成本为55,910美元。考虑到187个血液单位可避免不当废弃,仅对乙型肝炎进行快速筛查然后进行ELISA筛查的可归因成本为53,313.9美元。
该分析表明,通过适当的献血者选择,仅在ELISA筛查前对乙型肝炎病毒进行快速筛查更具成本效益。这也将减少献血者的等待时间以及HIV阳性时的咨询时间。