Suppr超能文献

Ⅰ(E)期弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤的复发

Relapse in stage I(E) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.

作者信息

Nijland Marcel, Boslooper Karin, van Imhoff Gustaaf, Kibbelaar Robbie, Joosten Peter, Storm Huib, van Roon Eric N, Diepstra Arjan, Kluin-Nelemans Hanneke C, Hoogendoorn Mels

机构信息

Department of Hematology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.

Department of Pathology, Pathology Friesland, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Hematol Oncol. 2018 Apr;36(2):416-421. doi: 10.1002/hon.2487. Epub 2017 Oct 30.

Abstract

Despite a general favourable outcome in limited stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), relapses occur in about 10 to 20% of patients. Prognostic models only partially identify patients at risk for relapse. Moreover, it is not known whether the outcome after such a relapse is similar to the outcome after relapse in advanced stages. From January 2004 through December 2012, all newly diagnosed patients with stage I(E) DLBCL were retrospectively analysed from 2 clinical databases to investigate the relapse pattern and outcome in relation to initial treatment and clinical characteristics. In 126 patients (median age 64 years), histologically confirmed stage I(E) DLBCL was diagnosed. With a median follow-up of 53 months (range 5-132 months), 1 progressive disease and 18 relapses occurred. The 5-year time to tumour progression and disease-specific survival were 85% (95% CI 79-91%) and 92% (95% CI 87%-97%), respectively. We observed no significant difference in relapse localization, time to tumour progression, and disease-specific survival between patients treated with abbreviated R-CHOP plus involved field radiotherapy or with 6 to 8 cycles of R-CHOP. Analysis of relapses showed relapse >5 years after initial treatment (late relapse) in 5 of 19 patients (26%). Six of 19 patients (32%) had central nervous system relapse. Three of 11 relapsed cases available for analysis (28%) showed an MYC translocation, suggesting an overrepresentation in the relapse group. Outcome of patients with a relapse was poor with a median survival after relapse of 8 months. Only 1 patient (5%) underwent successful autologous stem cell transplantation. To improve outcome in these patients, early identification of new biological factors such as a MYC translocation or a high risk for CNS dissemination might be helpful. Moreover, treatment of any relapse after stage I disease should be taken seriously. Salvage treatment should be similar to relapses after advanced DLBCL.

摘要

尽管局限期弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)总体预后良好,但仍有10%至20%的患者会复发。预后模型只能部分识别复发风险患者。此外,尚不清楚这种复发后的结局是否与晚期复发后的结局相似。从2004年1月至2012年12月,从2个临床数据库中对所有新诊断的I(E)期DLBCL患者进行回顾性分析,以研究复发模式以及与初始治疗和临床特征相关的结局。126例患者(中位年龄64岁)经组织学确诊为I(E)期DLBCL。中位随访53个月(范围5 - 132个月),发生1例疾病进展和18例复发。5年肿瘤进展时间和疾病特异性生存率分别为85%(95%CI 79 - 91%)和92%(95%CI 87% - 97%)。我们观察到,接受简化R-CHOP方案加受累野放疗或6至8周期R-CHOP方案治疗的患者在复发部位、肿瘤进展时间和疾病特异性生存率方面无显著差异。对复发情况的分析显示,19例患者中有5例(26%)在初始治疗后>5年复发(晚期复发)。19例患者中有6例(32%)发生中枢神经系统复发。11例可进行分析的复发病例中有3例(28%)显示MYC易位,提示在复发组中比例过高。复发患者的结局较差,复发后的中位生存期为8个月。只有1例患者(5%)成功接受了自体干细胞移植。为改善这些患者的结局,早期识别新的生物学因素如MYC易位或中枢神经系统播散高风险可能会有所帮助。此外,I期疾病后的任何复发都应得到重视。挽救性治疗应与晚期DLBCL复发后的治疗相似。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a002/5947732/41209505a87c/HON-36-416-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验