Institute for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University of Bonn , Bonn D-53115, Germany.
J Proteome Res. 2018 Jan 5;17(1):46-54. doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.7b00256. Epub 2017 Nov 10.
The identification of large numbers of phosphopeptides from complex samples largely relies on sample fractionation to reduce complexity and allow using large amounts of starting material. For such experiments, commonly fractionation of whole cell lysate digests followed by enrichment of phosphopeptides from the single fractions is performed. We evaluated the tip-based fractionation of batch-enriched phosphopeptides as an alternative method. We compared three tip-based fractionation methods employing strong cation exchange (SCX), strong anion exchange (SAX), and C18 material for basic reversed-phase (BRP) fractionation using HeLa whole cell lysate digests. We show that SCX tips are superior to BRP and SAX tips due to a more efficient retention and distribution of phosphopeptides as well as a better resolution. Furthermore, we show that tip-based fractionation results in a similar performance as fractionation followed by phosphopeptide enrichment of the single fractions and outperforms analysis of unfractionated phosphopeptide-enriched samples with long chromatography gradients. Our fractionation approach using SCX tips is straightforward, reproducible, and requires a fraction of time, effort, and instrumentation compared to those of the fractionation of whole cell lysate digests with subsequent enrichment of phosphopeptides from the single fractions.
从复杂的样本中鉴定大量的磷酸肽在很大程度上依赖于样品的分馏来降低复杂性,并允许使用大量的起始材料。对于这样的实验,通常是对全细胞裂解物进行分级,然后从单个级分中富集磷酸肽。我们评估了基于尖端的分批富集磷酸肽的分级作为一种替代方法。我们比较了三种基于尖端的分级方法,分别采用强阳离子交换(SCX)、强阴离子交换(SAX)和 C18 材料进行基本反相(BRP)分级,使用 HeLa 全细胞裂解物进行消化。我们发现,由于磷酸肽的保留和分布效率更高,以及更好的分辨率,SCX 尖端优于 BRP 和 SAX 尖端。此外,我们还表明,基于尖端的分级与随后从单个级分中富集磷酸肽的分级一样,性能相似,优于未分级的磷酸肽富集样品的长色谱梯度分析。与从单个级分中富集磷酸肽的全细胞裂解物分级相比,我们使用 SCX 尖端的分级方法简单、可重复,并且需要的时间、努力和仪器设备都要少。