Ownsworth Tamara, Arnautovska Urska, Beadle Elizabeth, Shum David H K, Moyle Wendy
School of Applied Psychology (Drs Ownsworth, Beadle, and Shum and Ms Arnautovska), School of Nursing and Midwifery (Dr Moyle), and Menzies Health Institute Queensland (Drs Ownsworth, Shum, and Moyle), Griffith University, Australia.
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2018 Jul/Aug;33(4):E33-E46. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000350.
To identify and appraise studies evaluating the efficacy of telerehabilitation for adults with traumatic brain injury (TBI).
A systematic search of Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature), and PsycINFO databases was conducted from January 1980 to April 23, 2017, for studies evaluating the efficacy of telerehabilitation for adults with TBI. Two reviewers independently assessed articles for eligibility and rated methodological quality using 16 criteria related to internal validity, descriptive, and statistical characteristics.
The review yielded 13 eligible studies, including 10 randomized controlled trials and 3 pre-/postgroup studies (n ≥ 10). These evaluated the feasibility and/or efficacy of telephone-based (10 studies) and Internet-based (3 studies) interventions. Overall, the evidence of efficacy was somewhat mixed. The most common study design evaluated the efficacy of telephone-based interventions relative to usual care, for which 4 of 5 randomized controlled trials reported positive effects at postintervention (d = 0.28-0.51). For these studies, improvements in global functioning, posttraumatic symptoms and sleep quality, and depressive symptoms were reported. The feasibility of Internet-based interventions was generally supported; however, the efficacy could not be determined because of insufficient studies.
Structured telephone interventions were found to be effective for improving particular outcomes following TBI. Controlled studies of Internet-based therapy and comparisons of the clinical and cost-effectiveness of in-person and telerehabilitation formats are recommended for future research.
识别和评估评价远程康复对创伤性脑损伤(TBI)成人患者疗效的研究。
对Cochrane图书馆、MEDLINE、CINAHL(护理学与健康相关文献累积索引)和PsycINFO数据库进行系统检索,检索时间范围为1980年1月至2017年4月23日,以查找评价远程康复对TBI成人患者疗效的研究。两名评价者独立评估文章的纳入资格,并使用与内部效度、描述性和统计特征相关的16项标准对方法学质量进行评分。
该综述产生了13项符合条件的研究,包括10项随机对照试验和3项前后组研究(n≥10)。这些研究评估了基于电话(10项研究)和基于互联网(3项研究)干预措施的可行性和/或疗效。总体而言,疗效证据有些参差不齐。最常见的研究设计评估了基于电话的干预措施相对于常规护理的疗效,5项随机对照试验中有4项报告干预后有积极效果(d=0.28-0.51)。对于这些研究,报告了整体功能、创伤后症状和睡眠质量以及抑郁症状的改善。基于互联网的干预措施的可行性总体上得到了支持;然而,由于研究不足,无法确定其疗效。
发现结构化电话干预对改善TBI后的特定结局有效。建议未来开展基于互联网治疗的对照研究,以及对面对面康复和远程康复形式的临床和成本效益进行比较。