Marchini Leonardo, Hartshorn Jennifer E, Cowen Howard, Dawson Deborah V, Johnsen David C
Dr. Marchini is Assistant Professor, Preventive and Community Dentistry, University of Iowa College of Dentistry and Dental Clinics; Dr. Hartshorn is Clinical Assistant Professor, Preventive and Community Dentistry, University of Iowa College of Dentistry and Dental Clinics; Dr. Cowen is Clinical Professor, Preventive and Community Dentistry, University of Iowa College of Dentistry and Dental Clinics; Dr. Dawson is Professor and Director of Division of Biostatistics and Research Design, Iowa Institute for Oral Health Research, University of Iowa College of Dentistry and Dental Clinics; and Dr. Johnsen is Professor and Dean, University of Iowa College of Dentistry and Dental Clinics.
J Dent Educ. 2017 Nov;81(11):1283-1290. doi: 10.21815/JDE.017.086.
The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a learning strategy using critical thinking to teach dental students how to assess the risk of rapid oral health deterioration (ROHD) among elderly patients. A learning guide was developed using risk factors identified in the literature and the steps that expert faculty members apply in their clinical decision making, summarized in a set of ten steps. A new system of labeling risk was developed for the elderly population, which correlates the level of risk with the amount of disease. Participants in the study were all 91 fourth-year dental students in two subsequent classes who took part in a five-week Geriatrics and Special Needs Clinic rotation in the spring of 2015 and 2016. The students were introduced to the ROHD concept and asked to use the guide in a presentation during their rotation. The students were graded on an A, G, or M scale (Applied concept, Grasped and applied concept, or Missed application of concept). Students were also asked to assess their learning experience, and their answers were thematically grouped and analyzed. For eight of the ten steps, at least 93% of the students were graded A or G. The exceptions were the steps about developing a communications plan, which was missed by 23.1%, and self-assessment, which was missed by 30.8%. Interexaminer agreement on students' applying (A + G grades) versus missing the step was moderate or high on six of ten items. Nearly all the students (98.7%) considered assessing the risk of ROHD an important or very important skill. In this study, a learning strategy to teach dental students how to assess the risk of ROHD among elderly patients was developed and successfully implemented.
本研究的目的是开发并评估一种运用批判性思维的学习策略,以教导牙科学生如何评估老年患者口腔健康快速恶化(ROHD)的风险。利用文献中确定的风险因素以及专家教员在临床决策中应用的步骤,制定了一份学习指南,总结为十个步骤。针对老年人群开发了一种新的风险标注系统,该系统将风险水平与疾病数量相关联。本研究的参与者为随后两个班级的所有91名四年级牙科学生,他们于2015年春季和2016年参加了为期五周的老年病学和特殊需求诊所轮转。向学生介绍了ROHD概念,并要求他们在轮转期间的一次展示中使用该指南。学生按照A、G或M等级进行评分(应用概念、掌握并应用概念或未应用概念)。还要求学生评估他们的学习体验,并将他们的答案进行主题分组和分析。在十个步骤中的八个步骤中,至少93%的学生被评为A或G。例外的步骤是制定沟通计划(23.1%的学生未掌握)和自我评估(30.8%的学生未掌握)。在十个项目中的六个项目上,考官之间关于学生应用(A+G等级)与未掌握该步骤的一致性为中等或高度。几乎所有学生(98.7%)都认为评估ROHD风险是一项重要或非常重要的技能。在本研究中,开发并成功实施了一种教导牙科学生如何评估老年患者ROHD风险的学习策略。