Suppr超能文献

急诊科静脉推注头孢菌素类抗生素:一项实践改进项目。

Intravenous Push Cephalosporin Antibiotics in the Emergency Department: A Practice Improvement Project.

作者信息

McLaughlin Julie M, Scott Robin A, Koenig Stephanie L, Mueller Scott W

机构信息

UCHealth, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado (Dr McLaughlin and Ms Scott); UCHealth, Longs Peak Hospital, Longmont, Colorado (Ms Koenig); and Skaggs School of Pharmacy, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado (Dr Mueller).

出版信息

Adv Emerg Nurs J. 2017 Oct/Dec;39(4):295-299. doi: 10.1097/TME.0000000000000160.

Abstract

Delays in administration of appropriate antibiotics to patients with septic shock are associated with increased mortality. To improve the care of patients with sepsis within our 73-bed emergency department (ED), a "first-dose" intravenous push (IVP) cephalosporin antibiotic protocol was initiated. This project was aimed at improving the time from provider order of antibiotic to administration, which follows the Sepsis Core Measure of timely antibiotic administration.This was a single-center, retrospective analysis of a practice improvement study. Time from provider order of an IV cephalosporin antibiotic to administration was compared between postprotocol dates of March to May 2016 (n = 1110) and preprotocol dates of November 2015 to January 2016 (n = 1146). The cost of supplies for IVP was compared with traditional infusion. Prior to implementation of the IVP protocol, ED nursing staff completed a survey of administration preferences and then received one-on-one instruction about the protocol from the clinical nurse specialist and clinical nurse educator. In addition, a tip sheet was developed and IVP kits complete with all needed supplies were made available in the automated medication dispensing system.Median time from IV cephalosporin antibiotic order to administration significantly decreased by 8, 12, 14, and 13 min for ceftriaxone, ceftazidime, cefepime, and cefazolin, respectively (p < 0.007 for all). This was true for all indications of antibiotic use. Nursing staff favored IVP administration over traditional IV infusion (87%). Supply cost to administer IVP antibiotics was $0.83 compared with $9.53 for traditional IV infusion.A "first-dose IVP" protocol decreased time to administration by eliminating the need for procurement of an infusion pump, setup, and documentation of a secondary infusion. It was also preferred by ED nursing staff and associated with cost savings.

摘要

脓毒性休克患者使用合适抗生素的延迟与死亡率增加相关。为改善我们拥有73张床位的急诊科(ED)内脓毒症患者的护理,启动了一项“首剂”静脉推注(IVP)头孢菌素抗生素方案。该项目旨在缩短从医生开出抗生素医嘱到用药的时间,这符合及时使用抗生素的脓毒症核心指标。

这是一项针对实践改进研究的单中心回顾性分析。比较了2016年3月至5月方案实施后日期(n = 1110)与2015年11月至2016年1月方案实施前日期(n = 1146)从医生开出静脉注射头孢菌素抗生素医嘱到用药的时间。将IVP的耗材成本与传统输注成本进行了比较。在实施IVP方案之前,ED护理人员完成了一项关于用药偏好的调查,然后由临床护士专家和临床护士教育者对该方案进行一对一指导。此外,还制定了一份提示单,并在自动配药系统中提供了配备所有所需耗材的IVP套件。

头孢曲松、头孢他啶、头孢吡肟和头孢唑林从静脉注射头孢菌素抗生素医嘱到用药的中位时间分别显著缩短了8、12、14和13分钟(所有p < 0.007)。这在所有抗生素使用指征中均成立。护理人员更倾向于IVP给药而非传统静脉输注(87%)。使用IVP抗生素的供应成本为0.83美元,而传统静脉输注为9.53美元。

“首剂IVP”方案通过消除采购输液泵、设置和记录二次输注的需求,缩短了用药时间。它也更受ED护理人员青睐,且能节省成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验