Suppr超能文献

大气模式评估在示踪剂稀释法测量垃圾填埋场甲烷排放中对风的依赖性。

Atmospheric modeling to assess wind dependence in tracer dilution method measurements of landfill methane emissions.

机构信息

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 205 O'Brien Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-1710, United States.

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 621 Davis Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720-1710, United States.

出版信息

Waste Manag. 2018 Mar;73:197-209. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2017.10.036. Epub 2017 Nov 2.

Abstract

The short-term temporal variability of landfill methane emissions is not well understood due to uncertainty in measurement methods. Significant variability is seen over short-term measurement campaigns with the tracer dilution method (TDM), but this variability may be due in part to measurement error rather than fluctuations in the actual landfill emissions. In this study, landfill methane emissions and TDM-measured emissions are simulated over a real landfill in Delaware, USA using the Weather Research and Forecasting model (WRF) for two emissions scenarios. In the steady emissions scenario, a constant landfill emissions rate is prescribed at each model grid point on the surface of the landfill. In the unsteady emissions scenario, emissions are calculated at each time step as a function of the local surface wind speed, resulting in variable emissions over each 1.5-h measurement period. The simulation output is used to assess the standard deviation and percent error of the TDM-measured emissions. Eight measurement periods are simulated over two different days to look at different conditions. Results show that standard deviation of the TDM- measured emissions does not increase significantly from the steady emissions simulations to the unsteady emissions scenarios, indicating that the TDM may have inherent errors in its prediction of emissions fluctuations. Results also show that TDM error does not increase significantly from the steady to the unsteady emissions simulations. This indicates that introducing variability to the landfill emissions does not increase errors in the TDM at this site. Across all simulations, TDM errors range from -15% to 43%, consistent with the range of errors seen in previous TDM studies. Simulations indicate diurnal variations of methane emissions when wind effects are significant, which may be important when developing daily and annual emissions estimates from limited field data.

摘要

由于测量方法的不确定性,垃圾填埋场甲烷排放的短期时间变化性还不太清楚。使用示踪剂稀释法(TDM)进行短期测量活动时,会发现明显的可变性,但这种可变性可能部分归因于测量误差,而不是实际垃圾填埋场排放的波动。在这项研究中,使用天气研究与预报模型(WRF)模拟了美国特拉华州一个真实垃圾填埋场的填埋甲烷排放和 TDM 测量排放,模拟基于两个排放情景。在稳定排放情景中,在垃圾填埋场表面的每个模型网格点上规定了恒定的垃圾填埋场排放率。在非稳定排放情景中,排放是根据当地地表风速在每个时间步长计算的,导致在每个 1.5 小时的测量周期内排放变化。模拟输出用于评估 TDM 测量排放的标准偏差和百分比误差。模拟了两天中的八个测量周期,以研究不同的条件。结果表明,TDM 测量排放的标准偏差从稳定排放模拟到非稳定排放情景没有显著增加,表明 TDM 在预测排放波动方面可能存在固有误差。结果还表明,TDM 误差从稳定排放到非稳定排放模拟没有显著增加。这表明,在该地点引入填埋场排放的可变性不会增加 TDM 的误差。在所有模拟中,TDM 误差范围在-15%到 43%之间,与之前 TDM 研究中看到的误差范围一致。当风的影响显著时,模拟表明甲烷排放存在日变化,这在从有限的现场数据开发每日和年度排放估算时可能很重要。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验