Suppr超能文献

在减少阿片等效剂量的情况下,短效阿片类药物与慢性骨关节炎患者的长效阿片类药物具有相当的镇痛效果。

Short-Acting Opioids Are Associated with Comparable Analgesia to Long-Acting Opioids in Patients with Chronic Osteoarthritis with a Reduced Opioid Equivalence Dosing.

机构信息

Division of General Medicine and Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine.

Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

出版信息

Pain Med. 2018 Nov 1;19(11):2191-2195. doi: 10.1093/pm/pnx245.

Abstract

SETTING

There are no studies that exist within the primary care setting that address optimal opioid therapy in osteoarthritis patients. In light of the recently released US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines on opioid use in chronic noncancer pain, there is a pressing need to better characterize the effectiveness of long- and short-acting opioids.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effectiveness of short-acting opioids (SAO) vs long-acting opioids (LAO) and combination therapies (SAO and LAO) for treating chronic osteoarthritis pain in a retrospective trial.

METHODS

Average and lowest pain scores approximately one to two weeks prior to patient appointments were collected and averaged for both SAO and LAO patients who were actively enrolled in a pain clinic at an academic medical center.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference between reported average and low pain scores for the SAO vs LAO groups (P = 0.201 and P = 0.296, respectively), although the SAO group on average had a significantly lower morphine equivalence (P < 0.001). Various covariates for both groups were tested in an adjusted model to look at trends in the use of nonopioid medications (i.e., acetaminophen, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, antidepressants, and adjunct analgesic agents). No significant differences in pain scores existed when comparing covariates for the SAO vs LAO groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The study suggests that in addition to being effective, short-acting opioid medications may also provide a safer and cheaper alternative to long-acting opioid therapies in the treatment of chronic osteoarthritis.

PERSPECTIVE

This article investigates the effectiveness of short-acting vs long-acting opioids for the treatment of chronic noncancer pain, specifically osteoarthritis. This information could potentially aid practitioners in primary care environments to design equally efficacious and less costly opioid regimens, while simultaneously enhancing patient safety.

摘要

背景

在初级保健环境中,没有研究针对骨关节炎患者的最佳阿片类药物治疗。鉴于美国疾病控制与预防中心最近发布的关于慢性非癌症疼痛中阿片类药物使用的指南,迫切需要更好地描述长效和短效阿片类药物的有效性。

目的

在回顾性试验中,检查短效阿片类药物(SAO)与长效阿片类药物(LAO)和联合治疗(SAO 和 LAO)治疗慢性骨关节炎疼痛的效果。

方法

在学术医疗中心的疼痛诊所中,大约在患者预约前一到两周,收集并平均了正在接受治疗的 SAO 和 LAO 患者的平均和最低疼痛评分。

结果

SAO 与 LAO 组之间的报告平均和低疼痛评分之间没有统计学差异(P 值分别为 0.201 和 0.296),尽管 SAO 组的吗啡当量平均明显较低(P<0.001)。对两组的各种协变量进行了调整模型测试,以观察非阿片类药物(即对乙酰氨基酚、非甾体抗炎药、抗抑郁药和辅助镇痛药)使用的趋势。当比较 SAO 与 LAO 组的协变量时,疼痛评分没有明显差异。

结论

该研究表明,短效阿片类药物除了有效外,在治疗慢性骨关节炎方面,也可能提供一种比长效阿片类药物治疗更安全、更便宜的替代方案。

观点

本文研究了短效与长效阿片类药物治疗慢性非癌症疼痛(特别是骨关节炎)的效果。这些信息可能有助于初级保健环境中的从业者设计同样有效的、成本更低的阿片类药物治疗方案,同时提高患者安全性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验