从精神病前驱期到精神病首次发作:没有认知能力下降的证据。
From the psychosis prodrome to the first-episode of psychosis: No evidence of a cognitive decline.
机构信息
Division of Psychiatry Research, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, Northwell Health, Glen Oaks, NY, USA; Center for Psychiatric Neuroscience, The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research, Northwell Health, Manhasset, NY, 11030, USA; Department of Psychiatry, The Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA.
Department of Psychology, Brooklyn College, The Graduate Center of the City University of New York, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
出版信息
J Psychiatr Res. 2018 Jan;96:231-238. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2017.10.014. Epub 2017 Oct 19.
Cognitive deficits have an important role in the neurodevelopment of schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders. However, there is a continuing debate as to whether cognitive impairments in the psychosis prodrome are stable predictors of eventual psychosis or undergo a decline due to the onset of psychosis. In the present study, to determine how cognition changes as illness emerges, we examined baseline neurocognitive performance in a large sample of helping-seeking youth ranging in clinical state from low-risk for psychosis through individuals at clinical high-risk (CHR) for illness to early first-episode patients (EFEP). At baseline, the MATRICS Cognitive Consensus battery was administered to 322 individuals (205 CHRs, 28 EFEPs, and 89 help-seeking controls, HSC) that were part of the larger Early Detection, Intervention and Prevention of Psychosis Program study. CHR individuals were further divided into those who did (CHR-T; n = 12, 6.8%) and did not (CHR-NT, n = 163) convert to psychosis over follow-up (Mean = 99.20 weeks, SD = 21.54). ANCOVAs revealed that there were significant overall group differences (CHR, EFEP, HSC) in processing speed, verbal learning, and overall neurocognition, relative to healthy controls (CNTL). In addition, the CHR-NTs performed similarly to the HSC group, with mild to moderate cognitive deficits relative to the CTRL group. The CHR-Ts mirrored the EFEP group, with large deficits in processing speed, working memory, attention/vigilance, and verbal learning (>1 SD below CNTLs). Interestingly, only verbal learning impairments predicted transition to psychosis, when adjusting for age, education, symptoms, antipsychotic medication, and neurocognitive performance in the other domains. Our findings suggest that large neurocognitive deficits are present prior to illness onset and represent vulnerability markers for psychosis. The results of this study further reinforce that verbal learning should be specifically targeted for preventive intervention for psychosis.
认知缺陷在精神分裂症和其他精神病障碍的神经发育中起着重要作用。然而,关于精神病前驱期的认知障碍是否是最终精神病的稳定预测指标,或者是否由于精神病的发作而下降,仍存在持续的争论。在本研究中,为了确定随着疾病的出现认知如何变化,我们检查了一个大型求助青年样本的基线神经认知表现,这些青年的临床状态从精神病风险低到临床高风险(CHR)再到首发患者(EFEP)。在基线时,对 322 名个体(205 名 CHR、28 名 EFEP 和 89 名求助对照组(HSC))进行了 MATRICS 认知共识测试,这些个体是更大的早期检测、干预和预防精神病计划研究的一部分。CHR 个体进一步分为那些有(CHR-T;n=12,6.8%)和没有(CHR-NT,n=163)在随访期间转换为精神病的个体。ANCOVA 显示,在处理速度、言语学习和整体神经认知方面,与健康对照组(CNTL)相比,存在显著的总体组差异(CHR、EFEP、HSC)。此外,CHR-NTs 的表现与 HSC 组相似,与 CTRL 组相比存在轻度至中度认知缺陷。CHR-Ts 与 EFEP 组相似,在处理速度、工作记忆、注意力/警觉性和言语学习方面存在较大缺陷(比 CNTL 低 1 个标准差以上)。有趣的是,只有言语学习障碍在调整年龄、教育、症状、抗精神病药物和其他领域的神经认知表现后,才预测向精神病的转变。我们的研究结果表明,在疾病发作之前就存在较大的神经认知缺陷,这些缺陷是精神病的易感性标志物。本研究的结果进一步证实,言语学习应作为精神病预防干预的特定目标。