1 Department of Oral Biology, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
2 Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2018 Jun;24(3):171-178. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2017.0341. Epub 2018 Jan 2.
There is a paucity of in vivo studies that investigate the safety and efficacy of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) tissue regeneration approaches, in part due to the lack of established animal models. Review of disease models for study of TMJ is presented herein with an attempt to identify relevant preclinical animal models for TMJ tissue engineering, with emphasis on the disc and condyle. Although degenerative joint disease models have been mainly performed on mice, rats, and rabbits, preclinical regeneration approaches must employ larger animal species. There remains controversy regarding the preferred choice of larger animal models between the farm pig, minipig, goat, sheep, and dog. The advantages of the pig and minipig include their well characterized anatomy, physiology, and tissue properties. The advantages of the sheep and goat are their easier surgical access, low cost per animal, and its high tissue availability. The advantage of the dog is that the joint space is confined, so migration of interpositional devices should be less likely. However, each species has limitations as well. For example, the farm pig has continuous growth until about 18 months of age, and difficult surgical access due to the zygomatic arch covering the lateral aspect of joint. The minipig is not widely available and somewhat costly. The sheep and the goat are herbivores, and their TMJs mainly function in translation. The dog is a carnivore, and the TMJ is a hinge joint that can only rotate. Although no species provides the gold standard for all preclinical TMJ tissue engineering approaches, the goat and sheep have emerged as the leading options, with the minipig as the choice when cost is less of a limitation; and with the dog and farm pig serving as acceptable alternatives. Finally, naturally occurring TMJ disorders in domestic species may be harnessed on a preclinical trial basis as a clinically relevant platform for translation.
体内研究中,研究颞下颌关节(TMJ)组织再生方法的安全性和有效性的研究很少,部分原因是缺乏既定的动物模型。本文综述了 TMJ 疾病模型的研究,试图确定 TMJ 组织工程的相关临床前动物模型,重点是关节盘和髁突。尽管退行性关节疾病模型主要在小鼠、大鼠和兔子上进行,但临床前再生方法必须采用较大的动物物种。在农场猪、小型猪、山羊、绵羊和狗之间,对于较大动物模型的首选仍存在争议。猪和小型猪的优点包括其特征明确的解剖结构、生理学和组织特性。绵羊和山羊的优点是手术更容易、每只动物的成本低且组织可用性高。狗的优点是关节间隙受限,因此间隔装置的迁移可能性较小。然而,每种动物都有其局限性。例如,农场猪的生长持续到大约 18 个月,由于颧骨覆盖关节的外侧,因此手术难度较大。小型猪的可用性有限且成本较高。绵羊和山羊是食草动物,它们的 TMJ 主要用于平移。狗是肉食动物,TMJ 是铰链关节,只能旋转。虽然没有一种物种为所有临床前 TMJ 组织工程方法提供了黄金标准,但山羊和绵羊已成为首选,小型猪则成为成本不是限制因素时的选择,狗和农场猪则作为可接受的替代品。最后,家养动物中自然发生的 TMJ 疾病可能会在临床前试验基础上被利用,作为转化的临床相关平台。