• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

4种心脏风险计算器在预测非心脏手术后心脏并发症中的比较

Comparison of 4 Cardiac Risk Calculators in Predicting Postoperative Cardiac Complications After Noncardiac Operations.

作者信息

Cohn Steven L, Fernandez Ros Nerea

机构信息

Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida; Medical Consultation Service, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, Florida.

Hospital Medicine Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2018 Jan 1;121(1):125-130. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.09.031. Epub 2017 Oct 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.09.031
PMID:29126584
Abstract

The 2014 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Perioperative Guidelines suggest using the Revised Cardiac Risk Index, myocardial infarction or cardiac arrest, or American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program calculators for combined patient-surgical risk assessment. There are no published data comparing their performance. This study compared these risk calculators and a reconstructed Revised Cardiac Risk Index in predicting postoperative cardiac complications, both during hospitalization and 30 days after operation, in a patient cohort who underwent select surgical procedures in various risk categories. Cardiac complications occurred in 14 of 663 patients (2.1%), of which 11 occurred during hospitalization. Only 3 of 663 patients (0.45%) had a myocardial infarction or cardiac arrest. Because these calculators used different risk factors, different outcomes, and different durations of observation, a true direct comparison is not possible. We found that all 4 risk calculators performed well in the setting they were originally studied but were less accurate when applied in a different manner. In conclusion, all calculators were useful in defining low-risk patients in whom further cardiac testing was unnecessary, and the myocardial infarction or cardiac arrest may be the most reliable in selecting higher risk patients.

摘要

2014年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会围手术期指南建议使用修订的心脏风险指数、心肌梗死或心脏骤停,或美国外科医师学会-国家外科质量改进计划计算器进行患者手术风险综合评估。尚无比较它们性能的已发表数据。本研究比较了这些风险计算器以及一个重构的修订心脏风险指数在预测不同风险类别的择期手术患者住院期间及术后30天的术后心脏并发症方面的情况。663例患者中有14例(2.1%)发生心脏并发症,其中11例发生在住院期间。663例患者中只有3例(0.45%)发生心肌梗死或心脏骤停。由于这些计算器使用了不同的风险因素、不同的结局和不同的观察时长,因此无法进行真正的直接比较。我们发现,所有4种风险计算器在其最初研究的背景下表现良好,但以不同方式应用时准确性较低。总之,所有计算器在确定无需进一步心脏检查的低风险患者方面都很有用,而心肌梗死或心脏骤停在选择高风险患者方面可能最可靠。

相似文献

1
Comparison of 4 Cardiac Risk Calculators in Predicting Postoperative Cardiac Complications After Noncardiac Operations.4种心脏风险计算器在预测非心脏手术后心脏并发症中的比较
Am J Cardiol. 2018 Jan 1;121(1):125-130. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.09.031. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
2
Estimating risk of adverse cardiac event after vascular surgery using currently available online calculators.利用现有的在线计算器评估血管手术后不良心脏事件的风险。
J Vasc Surg. 2018 Jan;67(1):272-278. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.06.105. Epub 2017 Oct 21.
3
External validation of the Revised Cardiac Risk Index and National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Myocardial Infarction and Cardiac Arrest calculator in noncardiac vascular surgery.非心脏血管手术中修订后的心脏风险指数和国家手术质量改进计划心肌梗死和心脏骤停计算器的外部验证。
Br J Anaesth. 2019 Oct;123(4):421-429. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2019.05.029. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
4
Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Stroke, Cardiac, and Mortality Risk After Non-Cardiac Surgery.非心脏手术后卒中、心脏和死亡风险预测模型的开发和验证。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Feb 16;10(4):e018013. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.018013. Epub 2021 Jan 30.
5
Effect of preoperative angina pectoris on cardiac outcomes in patients with previous myocardial infarction undergoing major noncardiac surgery (data from ACS-NSQIP).术前心绞痛对既往有心肌梗死的患者行非心脏大手术心脏结局的影响(来自美国外科医师协会国家外科质量改进计划的数据)
Am J Cardiol. 2015 Apr 15;115(8):1080-4. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.01.542. Epub 2015 Jan 31.
6
Impact of the Choice of Risk Model for Identifying Low-risk Patients Using the 2014 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Perioperative Guidelines.2014 年美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会围手术期指南中使用不同风险模型识别低危患者的影响。
Anesthesiology. 2018 Nov;129(5):889-900. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000002341.
7
Development and validation of a risk calculator for prediction of cardiac risk after surgery.手术心脏风险预测风险计算器的开发和验证。
Circulation. 2011 Jul 26;124(4):381-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.015701. Epub 2011 Jul 5.
8
The Vascular Study Group of New England Cardiac Risk Index (VSG-CRI) predicts cardiac complications more accurately than the Revised Cardiac Risk Index in vascular surgery patients.新英格兰心血管风险指数(VSG-CRI)血管外科患者的血管研究小组预测心脏并发症比修订后的心血管风险指数更准确。
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Sep;52(3):674-83, 683.e1-683.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.03.031. Epub 2010 Jun 8.
9
Preoperative and intraoperative predictors of cardiac adverse events after general, vascular, and urological surgery.普通外科、血管外科及泌尿外科手术后心脏不良事件的术前及术中预测因素。
Anesthesiology. 2009 Jan;110(1):58-66. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318190b6dc.
10
Perioperative morbidity and mortality after noncardiac surgery in young adults with congenital or early acquired heart disease: a retrospective cohort analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database.先天性或早期获得性心脏病青年成人非心脏手术后的围手术期发病率和死亡率:一项基于国家外科质量改进计划数据库的回顾性队列分析
Am Surg. 2014 Apr;80(4):321-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a secondary analysis of the METREPAIR international cohort study.慢性心力衰竭患者接受非心脏手术的结局:METREPAIR国际队列研究的二次分析
Anaesthesia. 2025 Aug;80(8):927-934. doi: 10.1111/anae.16607. Epub 2025 Apr 15.
2
Comprehensive review of myocardial injury after noncardiac surgery: prevention, intervention, and long-term management strategies.非心脏手术后心肌损伤的综合综述:预防、干预及长期管理策略
J Cardiothorac Surg. 2025 Jan 30;20(1):108. doi: 10.1186/s13019-025-03358-1.
3
Assessing the value of deep neural networks for postoperative complication prediction in pancreaticoduodenectomy patients.
评估深度神经网络在胰十二指肠切除术患者术后并发症预测中的价值。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 30;19(12):e0316402. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0316402. eCollection 2024.
4
Association of a Novel Electronic Form for Preoperative Cardiac Risk Assessment With Reduction in Cardiac Consultations and Testing: Retrospective Cohort Study.一种用于术前心脏风险评估的新型电子表格与心脏会诊及检查减少之间的关联:回顾性队列研究
JMIR Perioper Med. 2024 Sep 13;7:e63076. doi: 10.2196/63076.
5
Predicting perioperative myocardial injury/infarction after noncardiac surgery in patients under surgical and medical co-management: a prospective cohort study.联合外科和内科管理的患者非心脏手术后围手术期心肌损伤/梗死的预测:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jun 21;24(1):540. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05130-x.
6
ASA Physical Status Determination by General Internists and Impact on Cardiac Risk Assessment.ASA 体格状况评估由普通内科医生进行及其对心脏风险评估的影响。
South Med J. 2023 Jul;116(7):530-534. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001579.
7
Practical role of preoperative echocardiography in low-risk non-cardiac surgery.术前超声心动图在低风险非心脏手术中的实际作用。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Jan 23;10:1088496. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1088496. eCollection 2023.
8
Predicting Postoperative Troponin in Patients Undergoing Elective Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Comparison of Five Cardiac Risk Prediction Tools.预测择期髋关节或膝关节置换术患者术后肌钙蛋白水平:五种心脏风险预测工具的比较
Cardiol Res Pract. 2022 Oct 14;2022:8244047. doi: 10.1155/2022/8244047. eCollection 2022.
9
PRE-OPerative ECHOcardiograhy for prevention of cardiovascular events after non-cardiac surgery in intermediate- and high-risk patients: protocol for a low-interventional, mixed-cohort prospective study design (PREOP-ECHO).术前超声心动图用于预防中高危非心脏手术患者的心血管事件:一项低干预、混合队列前瞻性研究设计(PREOP-ECHO)的方案。
Trials. 2022 Sep 14;23(1):776. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06701-2.
10
Big Data in Cardiology: State-of-Art and Future Prospects.心脏病学中的大数据:现状与未来展望
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 1;9:844296. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.844296. eCollection 2022.