Department of Prenatal Diagnosis, State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Department of Ultrasound, State Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Feb;218(2):244.e1-244.e17. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.10.225. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
Currently, chromosomal microarray analysis is considered the first-tier test in pediatric care and prenatal diagnosis. However, the diagnostic yield of chromosomal microarray analysis for prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease has not been evaluated based on a large cohort.
Our aim was to evaluate the clinical utility of chromosomal microarray as the first-tier test for chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with congenital heart disease.
In this prospective study, 602 prenatal cases of congenital heart disease were investigated using single nucleotide polymorphism array over a 5-year period.
Overall, pathogenic chromosomal abnormalities were identified in 125 (20.8%) of 602 prenatal cases of congenital heart disease, with 52.0% of them being numerical chromosomal abnormalities. The detection rates of likely pathogenic copy number variations and variants of uncertain significance were 1.3% and 6.0%, respectively. The detection rate of pathogenic chromosomal abnormalities in congenital heart disease plus additional structural anomalies (48.9% vs 14.3%, P < .0001) or intrauterine growth retardation group (50.0% vs 14.3%, P = .044) was significantly higher than that in isolated congenital heart disease group. Additionally, the detection rate in congenital heart disease with additional structural anomalies group was significantly higher than that in congenital heart disease with soft markers group (48.9% vs 19.8%, P < .0001). No significant difference was observed in the detection rates between congenital heart disease with additional structural anomalies and congenital heart disease with intrauterine growth retardation groups (48.9% vs 50.0%), congenital heart disease with soft markers and congenital heart disease with intrauterine growth retardation groups (19.8% vs 50.0%), or congenital heart disease with soft markers and isolated congenital heart disease groups (19.8% vs 14.3%). The detection rate in fetuses with congenital heart disease plus mild ventriculomegaly was significantly higher than in those with other types of soft markers (50.0% vs 15.6%, P < .05).
Our study suggests chromosomal microarray analysis is a reliable and high-resolution technology and should be used as the first-tier test for prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart disease in clinical practice.
目前,染色体微阵列分析被认为是儿科和产前诊断的首选检测方法。然而,基于大规模队列,尚未评估染色体微阵列分析在产前诊断先天性心脏病中的诊断效果。
本研究旨在评估染色体微阵列作为先天性心脏病胎儿染色体异常的一线检测方法的临床应用价值。
在这项前瞻性研究中,我们对 5 年内 602 例先天性心脏病的产前病例进行了单核苷酸多态性微阵列检测。
总体而言,在 602 例先天性心脏病的产前病例中,发现了 125 例(20.8%)致病性染色体异常,其中 52.0%为数目异常。可能致病性拷贝数变异和意义不明的变异的检出率分别为 1.3%和 6.0%。先天性心脏病合并其他结构异常(48.9%比 14.3%,P<0.0001)或宫内生长迟缓组(50.0%比 14.3%,P=0.044)的致病性染色体异常检出率明显高于单纯先天性心脏病组。此外,先天性心脏病合并其他结构异常组的检出率明显高于先天性心脏病合并软标记组(48.9%比 19.8%,P<0.0001)。先天性心脏病合并其他结构异常组与先天性心脏病合并宫内生长迟缓组(48.9%比 50.0%)、先天性心脏病合并软标记组与先天性心脏病合并宫内生长迟缓组(19.8%比 50.0%)或先天性心脏病合并软标记组与单纯先天性心脏病组(19.8%比 14.3%)的检出率无显著差异。合并轻度脑室扩张的先天性心脏病胎儿的检出率明显高于其他类型软标记的胎儿(50.0%比 15.6%,P<0.05)。
我们的研究表明,染色体微阵列分析是一种可靠且高分辨率的技术,应作为临床实践中先天性心脏病产前诊断的一线检测方法。