Institute of Natural Resource Conservation, Christian-Albrechts University Kiel, Olshausenstr. 75, 24118 Kiel, Germany.
Gesellschaft für Freilandökologie und Naturschutzplanung, Stuthagen 25, 24113 Molfsee, Germany.
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Mar 15;618:26-38. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.032. Epub 2017 Nov 9.
Lentic small water bodies have a high ecological potential as they fulfill several ecosystem services such as the retention of water and pollutants. They serve as a hot spot of biodiversity. Due to their location in or adjacent to agricultural fields, they can be influenced by inputs of pesticides and their transformation products. Since small water bodies have rarely been part of monitorings/campaigns up to now, their current exposure and processes guiding the pesticide input are not understood, yet. This study presents results of a sampling campaign of 10 lentic small water bodies from 2015 to 2016. They were sampled once after the spring application for a pesticide target screening, before autumn application and three times after rainfall events following the application. The autumn sampling focused on the herbicides metazachlor, flufenacet and their transformation products - oxalic acid and - sulfonic acid as representatives for common pesticides in the study region. The concentrations were associated with rainfall before and after application, characteristics of the site and the water bodies, physicochemical parameters and the applied amount of pesticides. The key results of the pesticide screening in spring indicate positive detections of pesticides which have not been applied for years to the single fields. The autumn sampling showed frequent occurrences of the transformation products, which are formed in soil, from 39% to 94% of all samples (n=71). Discharge patterns were observed for metazachlor with highest concentrations in the first sample after application and then decreasing, but not for flufenacet. The concentrations of the transformation products increased over time and revealed highest values mainly in the last sample. Besides rainfall patterns right after application, the spatial and temporal dissemination of the pesticides to the water bodies seems to play a major role to understand the exposure of lentic small water bodies.
缓流小型水体具有很高的生态潜力,因为它们可以发挥多种生态系统服务功能,如蓄水和污染物截留。它们是生物多样性的热点。由于它们位于或紧邻农业田地,因此可能受到农药及其转化产物的输入影响。由于迄今为止小型水体很少被纳入监测/运动的一部分,因此目前它们的暴露情况和引导农药输入的过程尚不清楚。本研究介绍了 2015 年至 2016 年期间对 10 个缓流小型水体进行采样活动的结果。它们在春季应用农药进行目标筛选后、秋季应用前以及应用后三次降雨事件后进行了一次采样。秋季采样重点关注了在研究区域中常见的除草剂甲草胺、氟磺胺草醚及其转化产物草酸和 - 磺酸。浓度与应用前后的降雨、场地和水体特征、理化参数以及施用量有关。春季农药筛选的主要结果表明,即使在多年未向单个田地施用过的情况下,也能检测到农药。秋季采样显示,土壤中形成的转化产物频繁出现,占所有样本(n=71)的 39%至 94%。观察到甲草胺的排放模式,应用后第一次采样时浓度最高,然后逐渐降低,但氟磺胺草醚则没有。转化产物的浓度随时间增加,主要在最后一次采样时显示出最高值。除了应用后立即的降雨模式外,农药向水体的时空传播似乎对于了解缓流小型水体的暴露情况起着重要作用。