• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经腋入路应用莲花瓣主动脉瓣输送系统行 TAVI 的可行性研究

A feasibility study of transaxillary TAVI with the lotus valve.

机构信息

Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Royal Stoke University Hospital, Stoke, Staffordshire, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep 1;92(3):542-549. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27409. Epub 2017 Nov 11.

DOI:10.1002/ccd.27409
PMID:29130619
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To assess the feasibility of axillary transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using the Lotus valve.

BACKGROUND

TAVI is used to treat patients with severe aortic stenosis, with transfemoral (TF) access being the safest and most widely used route. In patients unsuitable for this, there are reports that the axillary artery may be safest alternative access route. The Lotus device is a fully retrievable 2nd generation transcatheter heart valve which is licensed for femoral and transaortic access. There are limited data on the suitability of this valve for axillary access.

METHODS

We assessed the feasibility of transaxillary TAVI with the Lotus valve in patients unsuitable for TF TAVI. Between January and October 2016, we identified 10 patients who underwent transaxillary TAVI with the Lotus valve. This cohort was compared with 347 (85%) patients who underwent TF TAVI, 45 (11%) patients who underwent and trans-apical or direct-aortic TAVI and the total group of 16 (4%) patients who underwent axillary TAVI.

RESULTS

Ten patients aged 75 years (69-83) underwent attempted TAVI with the Lotus via axillary access. Device success was 100%. In-hospital and 30-day mortality was zero. There were no neurological events, no major vascular complications and no myocardial infarctions. Four of 10 patients required a pacemaker post-TAVI. No patient was left with moderate or greater aortic regurgitation. Median length of stay was 3 days CONCLUSIONS: TAVI with the Lotus valve is feasible via the axillary artery and appears safe in our small cohort of patients.

摘要

目的

评估使用 Lotus 瓣膜经腋动脉行经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)的可行性。

背景

TAVI 用于治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄患者,经股动脉(TF)入路是最安全和最常用的入路。对于不适合这种方法的患者,有报道称腋动脉可能是最安全的替代入路。Lotus 装置是一种完全可回收的第二代经导管心脏瓣膜,获准用于股动脉和经主动脉入路。关于该瓣膜用于腋动脉入路的适用性数据有限。

方法

我们评估了在不适合 TF TAVI 的患者中行经腋动脉 Lotus 瓣膜 TAVI 的可行性。在 2016 年 1 月至 10 月期间,我们确定了 10 例接受经腋动脉 Lotus 瓣膜 TAVI 的患者。该队列与 347 例(85%)接受 TF TAVI 的患者、45 例(11%)接受经心尖或直接主动脉 TAVI 的患者以及总共 16 例(4%)接受腋动脉 TAVI 的患者进行了比较。

结果

10 例年龄为 75 岁(69-83 岁)的患者经腋动脉尝试行 TAVI,使用 Lotus 瓣膜。器械成功率为 100%。院内和 30 天死亡率均为零。无神经事件、无重大血管并发症和无心肌梗死。10 例中有 4 例在 TAVI 后需要起搏器。无患者遗留中度或以上主动脉瓣反流。中位住院时间为 3 天。

结论

经腋动脉行 Lotus 瓣膜 TAVI 是可行的,在我们的小患者队列中似乎是安全的。

相似文献

1
A feasibility study of transaxillary TAVI with the lotus valve.经腋入路应用莲花瓣主动脉瓣输送系统行 TAVI 的可行性研究
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Sep 1;92(3):542-549. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27409. Epub 2017 Nov 11.
2
Procedural and thirty-day outcomes following transfemoral implantation of the fully repositionable and retrievable Lotus valve without routine pre-dilatation in a consecutive patient cohort: a single-center experience.连续患者队列中经股动脉植入可完全重新定位和回收的Lotus瓣膜且不进行常规预扩张后的手术及30天结局:单中心经验
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2018 Jan-Feb;19(1 Pt B):78-82. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.10.017. Epub 2017 Nov 4.
3
Direct percutaneous transaxillary implantation of a novel self-expandable transcatheter heart valve for aortic stenosis.新型自膨胀经导管心脏瓣膜经皮直接经腋动脉植入治疗主动脉瓣狭窄
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec 1;90(7):1167-1174. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26986. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
4
Transfemoral aortic valve implantation with new-generation devices: the repositionable Lotus vs. the balloon-expandable Edwards Sapien 3 valve.经股主动脉瓣置换术:可重定位的 Lotus 瓣膜与球囊扩张式 Edwards Sapien 3 瓣膜比较。
J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2018 Nov;19(11):655-663. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000705.
5
Feasibility and safety of transfemoral sheathless portico aortic valve implantation: Preliminary results in a single center experience.经股无鞘Portico主动脉瓣植入术的可行性与安全性:单中心经验的初步结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Feb 15;91(3):533-539. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27100. Epub 2017 May 13.
6
A comparison of the fully repositionable and retrievable Boston Lotus and direct flow medical valves for the treatment of severe aortic stenosis: A single center experience.用于治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄的完全可重新定位和可回收的波士顿莲花瓣膜与直流通医疗瓣膜的比较:单中心经验。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Apr 1;91(5):966-974. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27319. Epub 2017 Sep 20.
7
Transcutaneous aortic valve implantation using the carotid artery access: Feasibility and clinical outcomes.经颈动脉途径行经皮主动脉瓣植入术:可行性及临床结果。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2017 Jun-Jul;110(6-7):389-394. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2016.10.005. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
8
Transfemoral aortic valve implantation is more successful with the Edwards Sapien 3 compared with the Edwards XT for the treatment of symptomatic severe aortic stenosis.经股主动脉瓣置换术治疗症状性重度主动脉瓣狭窄时,爱德华兹·萨皮恩 3 号瓣比爱德华兹 XT 瓣更成功。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Aug-Sep;111(8-9):470-479. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2017.05.012. Epub 2017 Nov 8.
9
Procedural and 30-day clinical outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement with lotus valve: Results of the RELEVANT study.经导管植入莲花瓣膜进行主动脉瓣置换术后的操作及30天临床结果:相关研究结果
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2017 Dec 1;90(7):1206-1211. doi: 10.1002/ccd.26914. Epub 2017 Feb 1.
10
Safety and efficacy of the percutaneous transaxillary access for transcatheter aortic valve implantation using various transcatheter heart valves in 100 consecutive patients.100例连续患者使用各种经导管心脏瓣膜经皮经腋动脉途径进行经导管主动脉瓣植入术的安全性和有效性。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Apr 1;232:247-254. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 Jan 7.

引用本文的文献

1
The Place of Transaxillary Access in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) Compared to Alternative Routes-A Systematic Review Article.经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)中经腋入路与其他入路相比的地位——一篇系统评价文章
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2023 May 19;24(5):150. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2405150. eCollection 2023 May.
2
Comparison of Transfemoral versus Transsubclavian/Transaxillary access for transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis.经股动脉入路与经锁骨下动脉/经腋动脉入路用于经导管主动脉瓣置换术的比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2022 Dec 1;43:101156. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101156. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
Comparison of outcomes following transfemoral versus trans-subclavian approach for transcatheter aortic valve Implantation: A meta-analysis.
经股动脉与经锁骨下动脉途径行经导管主动脉瓣植入术的结局比较:一项荟萃分析。
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2020 Nov 6;31:100668. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2020.100668. eCollection 2020 Dec.
4
Atrial septal defect closure in a midget toy poodle.小型玩具贵宾犬的房间隔缺损闭合术。
Open Vet J. 2020 Apr;10(1):11-15. doi: 10.4314/ovj.v10i1.3. Epub 2020 Jan 20.